The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation
Abstract
In this article, organizational innovation is viewed as fundamentally cognitive, and the concept of organizational intelligence is developed and related to innovation. Individual and organizational intelligences are conceptualized as being functionally similar (i.e., as purposeful information processing that enables adaptation to environmental demands). Organizational intelligence, however, is a social outcome and is related to individual intelligence by mechanisms of aggregation, cross-level transference, and distribution. A conceptual framework is proposed that relates types and levels of intelligence, moderated by contextual factors, to the two stages of the organizational innovation process: initiation and implementation. Implications for research and management are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence (4th ed.).
Wechsler, D. (1958) · doi:10.1037/11167-000 · Cited by 1,683
Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.
Isenberg, D. J. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141 · Cited by 1,044
Creativity in the R&D Laboratory
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. (1987) · doi:10.35613/ccl.1987.1088 · Cited by 295
Group intelligence: why some groups are better than others
Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(88)90002-5 · Cited by 196
Cited by
DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACH
LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919601000427 · Cited by 1,581
Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.237 · Cited by 736
Explaining Compassion Organizing
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.1.59 · Cited by 714
Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005660 · Cited by 589
Choudhary, A. I., Akhtar, S. A., & Zaheer, A. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1470-8 · Cited by 327
30 years of intelligence models in management and business: A bibliometric review
López-Robles, J. R., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Porto Gómez, I., & Cobo, M. J. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.013 · Cited by 268
Reconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective
Dane, E. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 · Cited by 603
Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. C. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259086 · Cited by 217
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042079 · Cited by 99
“Glynn (1996) [139] presented a framework regarding the intellectual ability of individuals and organizations to innovate.”
Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behaviour
Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010) · Asian Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2010.01300.x · Cited by 87
(2013) · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Glynn, M. A.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1081
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141765119
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 31.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
