Cited by 1,207Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationAmerican Political and Social DynamicsPolitical Theory and Democracy

Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996

Bartels, Larry M.·2000·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

I assess extent of in American national elections since 1952 using a series of simple probit analyses. My measure of partisan voting is sensitive both to changes in distribution of partisanship and to changes in electoral relevance of partisanship. I find that impact of partisan loyalties on voting has increased in each of last six presidential elections, reaching a level in 1996 almost 80 percent higher than in 1972-and significantly higher than in any presidential election in at least 50 years. impact of partisanship on voting in congressional elections has also increased markedly, albeit more recently and to a level still well below that of 1950s. I conclude that conventional wisdom among scholars and commentators regarding of in American politics is badly outdated. he of is one of most familiar themes in popular and scholarly discourse about contemporary American politics. One influential journalist has asserted that The most important phenomenon of American politics in past quarter century has been rise of independent voters (Smith 1988, 671). Textbook writers tell their students that Voters no longer strongly identify with one of major parties as they once did (Wilson and Dilulio 1995, 180) and that the two major parties are no longer as central as they once were in tying people's everyday concerns to their choices in political system (Greenberg and Page 1997, 269). most persistent academic analyst of partisan decline has argued that For over four decades American publi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2669291

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bartels' analysis of voting behavior and party identification from 1952 to 1996 reveals that the strength and importance of party identification for voting behavior dropped in the 1960s and 1970s and has rebounded through the 1980s and 1990s.

    “Bartels' analysis of voting behavior and party identification from 1952 to 1996 reveals that the strength and importance of party identification for voting behavior dropped in the 1960s and 1970s and has rebounded through the 1980s and 1990s.”

    From Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures (2016) · cites this paper as Bartels, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartels, L. M.
Corresponding author
Bartels, Larry M.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
35
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977999485
Cited by
1,207
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 44
FWCI
120.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
party voting, party identification, voting behavior, independent voters, presidential elections, congressional elections, 1996 presidential election, 1972 presidential election, 1984 presidential election, 1988 presidential election, 1980 presidential election

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review