The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Provision of a Sanctioning System in the United States and Japan
Abstract
Yamagishi's (1986a) experiment, which tested hypotheses derived from the structural goal/expectation approach to the problem of social dilemmas, was replicated using North American subjects. The results of the current experiment, using 48 same-sex, four-person groups, replicated the major findings of the original study. In addition, American subjects had a higher level of trust and cooperated more in the absence of a sanctioning system than did Japanese subjects. On the other hand, the predicted difference between American and Japanese subjects in the contribution to the provision of a sanctioning system did not emerge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
Collective action and the evolution of social norms.
Ostrom, E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137 · Cited by 4,195
Toward a Psychology of Human Agency
Bandura, A. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x · Cited by 3,459
Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249397 · Cited by 2,392
Self-citationSocial Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context
Bandura, A. (2002) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00092 · Cited by 2,092
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (1999) · Asian Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00024 · Cited by 2,050
Social Capital and Community Governance
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00077 · Cited by 1,538
Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature
Chaudhuri, A. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1 · Cited by 1,445
Explaining altruistic behavior in humans
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00157-5 · Cited by 1,037
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis.
Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030939 · Cited by 659
Web Strategies to Promote Internet Shopping: Is Cultural-Customization NeedeD?1
Sia, C. L., Lim, K. H., Leung, K., Lee, M. K. O., Huang, W. W., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650306 · Cited by 342
Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust
Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011 · Cited by 336
Trust, Gullibility, and Social Intelligence
Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999) · Asian Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00030 · Cited by 262
Self-citationWisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition.
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., & Grossmann, I. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000171 · Cited by 235
The effect of food shape abnormality on purchase intentions in China
Loebnitz, N., & Grunert, K. G. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.005 · Cited by 103
Cognition is a matter of trust: Distrust tunes cognitive processes
Mayo, R. (2015) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1117249 · Cited by 78
Online Social Networks and Trust
Sabatini, F., & Sarracino, F. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-018-1887-2 · Cited by 49
Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants
Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171252 · Cited by 42
The Cocksure Conundrum: How Evolution Created a Gendered Currency of Corporate Overconfidence
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & von Hippel, W. (2022) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-022-00197-5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamagishi, T.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092090726
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
