The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Whether and When? Probability and Timing of Incumbents' Entry into Emerging Industrial Subfields
Abstract
Many people have helped with this paper. The author would like to acknowledge explicitly the assistance of Glenn Carroll, David Teece, and the ASQ editor and reviewers. Part of this research was conducted with financial assistance from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the University of California at Berkeley. This paper examines the probability and timing of entry by industry incumbents into emerging technical subfields. When a new technical subfield of an industry emerges, an industry incumbent faces opposing entry incentives, either to wait until technical and market uncertainties subside or to stake out a strong position early. This paper argues that an incumbent is likely to enter a new subfield if the firm's core products are threatened or if it possesses industry-specialized supporting assets. The greater the competitive threat, the less likely an incumbent is to enter but the earlier it will do so. The predictions are supported with analysis of 30 years of entry data from five subfields of the American medical diagnostic imaging industry.'
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history
Helfat, C. E. (2002) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/11.4.725 · Cited by 1,087
Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393552 · Cited by 947
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401 · Cited by 774
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2010 · Cited by 502
How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm‐level performance
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.459 · Cited by 497
Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms
Dencker, J. C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S. K. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0387 · Cited by 369
Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing
Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150905 · Cited by 343
A Selective Review of Time Assumptions in Strategy Research
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259207 · Cited by 279
Institutional and economic drivers of entrepreneurship: An international perspective
Simón-Moya, V., Revuelto-Taboada, L., & Guerrero, R. F. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.033 · Cited by 191
Technology-based, “adolescent” firm configurations
Bantel, K. A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00033-5 · Cited by 176
Hatfield, D. E., Tegarden, L. F., & Echols, A. E. (2001) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/s1047-8310(00)00039-0 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, W.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 208
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315879806
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.