INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY AND GROUP ABILITY TO UTILIZE INDIVIDUAL CREATIVE RESOURCES: A MULTILEVEL MODEL.
Abstract
The performance of 94 groups on 13 different open-ended tasks was studied. At the individual-team-member level, domain knowledge and performance-relevant behavioral measures of the three components of Amabile's (1983, 1996) theory of individual creativity related in predicted ways to individual differences. Support was found for new “cross-level” processes, labeled “team creativity-relevant processes.” At the group level, these processes moderated the relationship between aggregated individual creativity and group creativity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compassion is not an element of creativity.
“This supports research which indicates that compassion is not an element of creativity (Amabile, 1997;Taggar, 2002).”
From Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture (2010) · cites this paper as Taggar, 2002
Knowledge and skill about one's function is critical to creativity.
“This concurs with research that shows that knowledge and skill about one's function is critical to creativity (Amabile, 1997;Taggar, 2002).”
From Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture (2010) · cites this paper as Taggar, 2002
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941 · see citing works
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
Forgas, J. P. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 · Cited by 3,470 · see citing works
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221 · see citing works
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-t · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273 · see citing works
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 · Cited by 1,475 · see citing works
Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 · Cited by 1,152 · see citing works
Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309347376 · Cited by 1,141 · see citing works
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.001 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Hoch, J. E., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.012 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Yang, J., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2017) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-10-2015-0229 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Agreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211073007 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Hu, Q. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.01.005 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Creativity in Virtual Work: Effects of Demographic Differences
Martins, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410397382 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Group creativity in children and adolescents
Oztop, P., & Gummerum, M. (2020) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100923 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taggar, S.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Taggar, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-330
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2050259418
- Cited by
- 834
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- individual creativity, team creativity, domain knowledge, individual differences, open-ended tasks, group performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
