Cited by 119ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactOrganizational Learning and LeadershipTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Impact of top management leadership styles on ERP assimilation and the role of organizational learning

Open access
Shao, Zhen, Feng, Yuqiang, Hu, Qing·2017·Information & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.im.2017.01.005

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This theory has been used extensively in extant literature concerning assimilation of cloud computing, ERP assimilation, tracking technology, RFID technology in different management disciplines.

    “This theory has been used extensively in extant literature concerning assimilation of cloud computing (Liang, Ki, Zhang & Li, 2019; Maqueira et al., 2019), ERP assimilation (Shao, Feng & Hu, 2017), tracking technology (Basole & Nowak, 2018), RFID technology (Hossain et al., 2016, Wei, Lowry & Seedorf, 2015) in different management disciplines.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao, Feng & Hu, 2017

  • Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) routinisation.

    “Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017

  • Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) extension.

    “Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017

  • Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) adoption.

    “Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017

  • Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) initiation.

    “Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Hu, Q.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Baruch College (US)
Corresponding author
Hu, Qing
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
902-919
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582371525
Cited by
119
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information & Management (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
top management leadership, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, organizational learning, learning culture, ERP success, ERP implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review