The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other?1
Abstract
We argue that because of important epistemological differences between the fields of information technology and organization studies, much can be gained from greater interaction between them. In particular, we argue that information technology research can benefit from incorporating institutional analysis from organization studies, while organization studies can benefit even more by following the lead of information technology research in taking the material properties of technologies into account. We further suggest that the transformations currently occurring in the nature of work and organizing cannot be understood without considering both the technological changes and the institutional contexts that are reshaping economic and organizational activity. Thus, greater interaction between the fields of information technology and organization studies should be viewed as more than a matter of enrichment. In the intellectual engagement of these two fields lies the potential for an important fusion of perspectives, a fusion more carefully attuned to explaining the nature and consequences of the techno-social phenomena that increasingly pervade our lives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Self-citationTrist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Self-citationTechnological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736
Self-citationComputer-supported cooperative work: history and focus
Grudin, J. (1994) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.291294 · Cited by 1,639
The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet
Bakos, Y. (1998) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/280324.280330 · Cited by 1,386 · cited 1×
“Consider, for example, exuberant predictions of "frictionless" electronic commerce (Bakos 1998), "the death of distance" (Cairncross 1997), "plug and play interoperability" (Shaw 1999) and "cut-and-paste" virtual organizations (Mowshowitz 1997).”
MIS problems and failures: A socio- technical perspective
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248710 · Cited by 1,329
Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00752449 · Cited by 1,043
The impact of information systems on organizations and markets
Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/99977.99990 · Cited by 960
The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.10.1345 · Cited by 811
Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.4.356 · Cited by 312
Computerization and social transformations
Kling, R. (1991) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399101600304 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707
Design science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · Cited by 2,751
Self-citationPredicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036518 · Cited by 1,639
Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004 · Cited by 1,537
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-165
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2171748935
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 93.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
