Cited by 21Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEducation and Military IntegrationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Is prevention better than cure? A systematic review of the effectiveness of well-being interventions for military personnel adjusting to civilian life

Open access
Bauer, Andreas, Newbury-Birch, Dorothy, Robalino, Shannon, Ferguson, Jennifer, Wigham, Sarah·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Exposure to stressful and potentially traumatic experiences is a risk for military personnel and for some this may increase susceptibility to reduced well-being. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of interventions to promote the well-being of military personnel adjusting to civilian life. Electronic databases were searched including MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, Pilots and CINAHL. Twelve articles, all conducted in the USA, were included in the review. Articles were synthesised narratively and assessed for bias against established criteria. The studies evaluated the effectiveness of interventions for current and former military personnel. The interventions included expressive writing, anger management, cognitive training, psycho-education, and techniques to promote relaxation, connection in relationships and resilience. Interventions had some significant positive effects mostly for veterans adjusting to civilian life and other family members. There was much heterogeneity in the design and the outcome measures used in the studies reviewed. The review highlights the need for future robust trials examining the effectiveness of well-being interventions in military groups with diverse characteristics; in addition qualitative research to explore a conceptualisation of well-being for this group and the acceptability of interventions which may be perceived as treatment. The results of the review will be of interest to a number of stakeholders in military, public health and mental health settings. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42015026341.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0190144

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [47]Novaco RW. Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment Oxford: Lexington; 1975.
  2. [59]Derogatis LR. BSI 18, Brief Symptom Inventory 18: Administration, scoring and procedures manual: NCS Pearson, Incorporated 2001.
  3. [60]Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory: BSI; Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Pearson; 1993.
  4. [88]Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1995: 35– 7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, A., Newbury-Birch, D., Robalino, S., Ferguson, J., & Wigham, S.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Teesside University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wigham, Sarah
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-05-02
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
e0190144
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782897250
Cited by
21
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Forces in Mind Trust (BH140637)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
well-being interventions, military personnel, veterans, reintegration into civilian life, post-traumatic stress, resilience, expressive writing, anger management, cognitive training, psychoeducation, relaxation techniques, social connectedness, family members of military personnel, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Mental Health, Military Personnel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review