Cited by 1,409Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Statistics and Partitioning of Species Diversity, and Similarity among Multiple Communities

Lande, Russell·1996·Oikos

Abstract

Species richness, Shannon information, and Simpson diversity are the three most commonly used nonparametric measures of species diversity. The sampling bias and variance of these measures differ greatly. Species richness may be seriously underestimated for even very large samples from a speciose community. The bias in species richness and Shannon information depend on unknown parameters of the species abundance distribution. An unbiased estimator exists only for Simpson diversity. Each of these measures is concave, so that the total diversity in a pooled set of communities exceeds (or equals) the average diversity within communities. The total diversity in a set of communities can therefore be partitioned into positive, additive components within and among communities, corresponding to α- and β-diversity. Partitioning Simpson diversity corresponds to an analysis of variance. The proportion of the total diversity found within communities provides a natural measure of similarity among multiple communities. The expected similarity among multiple random samples from the same community depends on the number of samples and on the underlying measure of diversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3545743

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using different q values in the construction of Δ measures for comparing genetic diversities of two or more populations has the same effect: small q values impact differences in rare variants and large q values emphasize differences in common variants.

    “The use of different q values in the construction of Δ measures for the comparison of the genetic diversities of two (or more) populations will have the same effect50, 130, 131: small q values will impact differences in rare variants and large q values emphasize differences in common variants132.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lande, R.
Corresponding author
Lande, Russell
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-05
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
5
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318871708
Cited by
1,409
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 59
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oikos (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Environmental Biology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
species diversity, species richness, Shannon information, Simpson diversity, diversity partitioning, alpha diversity, beta diversity, community similarity, sampling bias, species abundance distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review