Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 802

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preliminary Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of a Foreign Language Anxiety Scale

Horwitz, Elaine K.·1986·TESOL Quarterly
DOI 10.2307/3586302
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Dickerson, W.B. (1984a, October). A new look at an old problem: The Z and D morphemes. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Midwest Regional TESOL Conference, Cincinnati. Dickerson, W.B. (1984b). The role of formal rules in pronunciation instruction. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem, & B. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL '83 (pp. 135148). Washington, DC: TESOL. Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 43-59. Harris, T. (1981). Practical English, Book 1. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Hisama, K. (1980). An analysis of various ESL proficiency tests. In J.W. Oller, Jr., & K. Perkins (Eds.), Research in language testing (pp. 47-53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Pike, L.W. (1979). An evaluation of alternative item formats for testing English as a foreign language (TOEFL Research Rep. No. 2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Suter, R.W. (1976). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. Language Learning, 26, 233-253.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3586302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Horwitz, E. K.
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1986-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
559
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/3586302
OpenAlex
W2013588773
Cited by
802
References
1
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.