The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology
Abstract
Jim Spickard; Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology by John Heritage. Cambridge: Polity Press (Basil Blackwell), 1984, viii + 336 pp. $34.95 and Studies in Ethnomethod
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory
Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612 · Cited by 1,753
A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629 · Cited by 1,226
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351810802028613 · Cited by 802
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Projecting the End of a Speaker's Turn: A Cognitive Cornerstone of Conversation
de Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0130 · Cited by 557
Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations With an Aphasie Man
Goodwin, C. (1995) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4 · Cited by 434
Participant Orientations in German Conversation‐for‐Learning
Kasper, G. (2004) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x · Cited by 262
Discourse Analysis: Dimensions of Critique in Psychology
Parker, I. (2013) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2012.741509 · Cited by 104
What “What?” Tells Us About How Conversationalists Manage Intersubjectivity
Robinson, J. D. (2014) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.900214 · Cited by 94
Analyzing Talk in Qualitative Inquiry: Exploring Possibilities, Problems, and Tensions
Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2005) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2005.10491854 · Cited by 83
Taking technomethodology seriously: hybrid change in the ethnomethodology–design relationship
Crabtree, A. (2004) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000500 · Cited by 71
Regulation of Teacher Elicitations in the Mathematics Classroom
Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S. (2009) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370000902797304 · Cited by 71
Co‐constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia
Bloch, S., & Beeke, S. (2008) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699200802394831 · Cited by 68
Never Say No … How the Brain Interprets the Pregnant Pause in Conversation
Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145474 · Cited by 62
Aphasia and topic initiation in conversation: a case study
Barnes, S. E., Candlin, C. N., & Ferguson, A. (2013) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00186.x · Cited by 28
When a Robot Comes to Life: The Interactional Achievement of Agency as a Transient Phenomenon
Pelikan, H., Broth, M., & Keevallik, L. (2022) · Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality · doi:10.7146/si.v5i3.129915 · Cited by 23
Berger, E., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018) · Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_3 · Cited by 23
Walker, T., Christensen, H., Mirheidari, B., Swainston, T., Rutten, C., Mayer, I., Blackburn, D., & Reuber, M. (2020) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301218795238 · Cited by 18
The Trouble with Common Ground
Koschmann, T. (2016) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-016-9245-x · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Spickard, J., Heritage, J., & Garfinkel, H.
- Venue
- Sociological Analysis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 188
- ISSN
- 0038-0210 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2417086224
- Cited by
- 1,603
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
