The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Abstract
A survey of 348 residents of southwestern New Jersey showed that most believed that several of a list of 10 conspiracy theories were at least probably true. People who believed in one conspiracy were more likely to also believe in others. Belief in conspiracies was correlated with anomia, lack of interpersonal trust, and insecurity about employment. Black and hispanic respondents were more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than were white respondents. Young people were slightly more likely to believe in conspiracy theories, but there were few significant correlations with gender, educational level, or occupational category.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research has linked beliefs in conspiracy theories with low levels of trust [8], [33].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism [8], [20], [31], [50]”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“People who endorse one conspiracy are known to be likely to also endorse multiple others”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Rokeach, M. (1960) · Cited by 2,349
Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.81.11.1498 · Cited by 785
Personal and Political Sources of Political Alienation
Citrin, J., McClosky, H., Shanks, J. M., & Sniderman, P. M. (1975) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400008024 · Cited by 226
The Myth of Left-Wing Authoritarianism
Stone, W. S. (1980) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3790998 · Cited by 204
Curran, W. J. (1973) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197310042891406 · Cited by 190
The need to have enemies and allies
Chivian, E. (1989) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0163-8343(89)90063-7 · Cited by 183
Attitudes, chaos, and the connectionist mind
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1814 · Cited by 95
Left-Wing Authoritarianism: Myth or Reality?
Eysenck, H. J. (1981) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791293 · Cited by 63
Goertzel, B. (1993) · Recent research in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4336-6 · Cited by 51
(1997) · Cambridge Archaeological Journal · doi:10.1017/s0959774300001979 · Cited by 49
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–999 of 999
Theoretical Model of Behavioral Consequences of Faith in Conspiracy Theory
Ярош, Н. С., & Artiukhova, V. (2021) · Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. A Series of Psychology · doi:10.26565/2225-7756-2021-70-10 · Cited by 1
“Результати ряду досліджень засвідчили , що до конспірології більш схильні люди , що виявляють підозрілість до інших та недовіряють оточуючим (Goertzel, 1994; Swami et al., 4; Bruder et al., 2013).”
The Social Representation of Covid-19: How Collective Opinion Influences Individual Behaviour
CAZAN, S. (2021) · Perspective Politice · doi:10.25019/perspol/21.14.2
(2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812109-2.00028-8
Theoretical typology of deceptive contentPreprint
Zeng, J. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x4myf
Koštialová, K., Mesežnikov, G., Bumová, I. Š., Bahenský, F. (., Beranská, V., & Mušinka, M. (2019) · Slovenský národopis · doi:10.2478/se-2019-0006
“Ako písal Ted Goertzel, konšpiračné mys - lenie na individuálnej úrovni je sýtené potrebou jednotlivcov logicky vysvetliť určité udalosti v podmienkach neistoty a nedostatku kontroly (Goertzel, 1994).”
Creencias conspiratorias. Aspectos formales y generales de un fenómeno antiguo
de Guadalajara, U., & Montanari, P. (2022) · Protrepsis · doi:10.32870/prot.i22.336
Williams, M. N., Marques, M. D., Hill, S., Kerr, J. R., & Ling, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xyf46
Odczuwany lęk w pandemii a wierzenia spiskowe i wybrane wzorce adaptacji
Leska, K., & Nawrocka, P. (2022) · Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk · doi:10.15503/onis2022.94.110
“Między podgrupami utworzonymi z młodszych i starszych badanych o podwyższonym lub obniżonym poziomie wierzeń Spiskowych różnice nie były istotne.”
BackgroundInfluentialOnline Content and Platform Liability
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0009 · Cited by 1
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0009
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0005
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0008
Disinformation in the Digital Age
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0014
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.005.0001
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Technology and the Covid-19 Pandemic
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0003
Introduction: Why You Should Read This Book
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0011
Facts about the European Digital Economy
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0002
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0010
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0004
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0007
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0007
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0010
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0004
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0012
Mariniello, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.003.0011
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198831471.002.0003
Martinez, L. S. (2022) · The International Encyclopedia of Health Communication · doi:10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0631
“If you can’t see the pattern here, there’s something wrong”
Mason, J. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.08mas
(2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2149391
Цифровая утопия: труд в эпоху искусственного интеллекта
Мартыненко, Т. С. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-129-140
Michalopoulos, G. (2019) · Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies · doi:10.25167/sk.1367
King, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-141-146
Abada, F. C., Chidi-Igbokwe, M.-I. A., Ejezie, C., Alio, N., & Aniago, E. (2022) · Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v14n4.05
The Divine Nature of Conspiracy
Shewell, T. (2021) · Psych-Talk · doi:10.53841/bpstalk.2021.1.99.23
Contagious conspiracy theories and potential pathways to address them
Cookson, D. (2020) · PsyPag Quarterly · doi:10.53841/bpspag.2020.1.115.17
Pant, I., Broniatowski, D. A., Long, M. W., Duwal, S., Polackal, J., Chandarana, S., & Turner, M. M. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.45686
Preferences for descriptiveness and co-explanation in complex explanationsPreprint
Hattersley, M., Orchinik, R., Ludvig, E. A., & Bhui, R. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/px6t5
Police killings reduce trust: Predictors of trust in the police across 46 countriesPreprint
Vilar, R., Hanel, P. H. P., Coelho, G. L. D. H., Monteiro, R. P., & Liu, J. H.-F. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cxn4h
How Adult Learning from Media Cultures Changed the World in 2020
Wright, R. R. (2023) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19592-1_58
Deniz, M. E. (2022) · Yildiz Journal of Educational Research Yildiz Technical University · doi:10.14744/yjer.2021.008
PSIHOLOGIJA VJEROVANJA U TEORIJE ZAVJERE / PSYCHOLOGY OF CONSPIRACY BELIEFS
Jusić, M. (2023) · Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues · doi:10.48052/19865244.2022.3.57 · Cited by 1
Demmrich, S., & Hanel, P. H. P. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yjt3z
Imhoff, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40118-4_41
YouNICon: YouTube’s CommuNIty of Conspiracy Videos
Liaw, S. Y., Huang, F., Benevenuto, F., Kwak, H., & An, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22218 · Cited by 5
Ejiga, I., Lucas, B. D., & Gowok, G. G. (2023) · Journal of Emerging Technologies · doi:10.57040/jet.v3i1.450
“A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an occurrence or circumstance that suggests a political, frequently evil, and strong group is involved (Jaron & Stef, 2021; Ted, 1994).”
BackgroundMonological or Ideological? Themes and Psychosocial Predictors of Conspiracy BeliefPreprint
Cosgrove, T. J., Bahr, M., & Fritzon, K. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2kwbx
Silence as Leadership Communication: Public Perception, Interpretation, and Negotiated Meaning
Utulu, A. U., & Bello, D. B. (2023) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2023.v19n22p71
Connecting the domains: an investigation of internet domains found in Covid-19 conspiracy tweets
Moffitt, J. D., King, C., & Carley, K. M. (2023) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-023-09379-2
“Individuals who believe in one theory tend to also place confidence in several others at the same time, even if they are unrelated or even incompatible (Douglas et al. 2017; Georgiou et al. 2020; Goertzel 1994; Wood et al. Nov 2012).”
Искажая восприятие агрессии России: как нам воевать в информационной войне?
Хун, Х. Т. (2022) · Connections The Quarterly Journal · doi:10.11610/connections.rus.21.3.05
Proto-croyances et prolifération narrative dans les théories du complot
Bronner, G., & Cordonier, L. (2023) · L Année sociologique · doi:10.3917/anso.232.0435
Information Disorders in the Current Media Environment
Buturoiu, R., Corbu, N., & Boţan, M. (2023) · Springer studies in media and political communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41954-6_7 · Cited by 1
Epidemiología sociocultural de la crisis del COVID-19
Plaza, R. G. (2023) · Gredos (University of Salamanca) · doi:10.14201/gredos.153227
“La realidad habla por sí sola”. Cuando exhibir fuertes convicciones no es propiamente una virtud
Montanari, P. (2023) · Open Insight · doi:10.23924/oi.v14i32.574
陰謀論信念に影響を与える個人要因に対する熟慮的思考の調整機能の検討Preprint
Ozono, H., & Sakakibara, R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vgf6p
Inclusión-marginación en procesos locales culturales, educativos y mediáticos
Torres, A. B. H., Arellano, I. T. L., Valencia, J., González, R. M. A., León, A. S. R., Gámez, M. G. R., Valencia, L. G. H., Gómez, K. N., Leal, S. V., Tapia, A. V., et al. (2023) · Ediciones Comunicación Científica eBooks · doi:10.52501/cc.146
Összeesküvés-elméletekben való hit, korai maladaptív sémák és személyiségjellemzők
Mirnics, Z., Nagy, V., Szilágyi, T., & Rózsa, S. (2022) · Psychologia Hungarica Caroliensis · doi:10.52993/psyhung.10.2022.3.5
“A kutatók (Pierre, 2020, Klein és mtsai, 2019, Brotherton és mtsai, 2013) felvetették, hogy az összeesküvés-el - méletekben való hit mögött egyfajta sajátos mélystruktúra, „mindset” húzódhat meg, amelynek elemei zárt hálózatban „tapadnak össze” (Goertzel, 1994).”
Gille, F. (2023) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.51952/9781447367352.bm001
La Relación entre la Mentalidad Conspirativa y los Rasgos Narcisistas
Castillo, M. A. A., Ramírez-Oliver, J. A., Peña-Medina, Y. O., & Sánchez-Vincitore, L. V. (2024) · Revista Caribeña de Psicología · doi:10.37226/rcp.v8i1.8101
The Combination of Two Conspiracy-Belief-Scales and a correlational analysis with Epistemic BeliefsPreprint
Hollitzer, P., Daseking, M., & Ibrahim, F. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3924306/v1
Revealing Attentional Biases in Conspiracy Theory BelieversPreprint
Komáromy, Z., Lorusso, A. M., van der Wal, R. C., & Hortensius, R. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/p2bgy
Narrating Conspiracy Theories: A Paradoxical Ethics of Otherness, Propaganda and Mistrust
Bohovyk, O., & Bezrukov, A. (2024) · ENTHYMEMA · doi:10.54103/2037-2426/18614
Andrade, G. E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_105-1
Palatial Conspiracy in Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Abu Zafar’s Siraj-ud-Daulah: A Comparative Study
Afroz, S. (2024) · Social Science Humanities and Sustainability Research · doi:10.22158/sshsr.v5n2p1
On some aspects of the growing popularity of conspiracy theories
Ivančík, R., & Andrassy, V. (2024) · Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues · doi:10.9770/jesi.2024.11.3(2
الإيمان بنظريات المؤامرة: المبادئ الأساسية لمجال بحثي مستجد
جان, و. ف. ب., & دوغلاس, م. د. ك. م. (2023) · The Egyptian Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.21608/ejsbs.2023.347131
Vorbemerkung zur zweiten Auflage
Anton, A., Schetsche, M. T., & Walter, M. K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-43429-8_1
Hövelmann, G. H. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-43429-8_9
Anton, A., Schetsche, M. T., & Walter, M. K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-43429-8_2
The Factor Structure of Conspiracist Beliefs
Zimmer, K. (2024) · OpenPsych · doi:10.26775/op.2024.04.26
Fox, J., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.002.0003
Multivariate Analyses and Technical Details
Fox, J., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.005.0001
Fox, J., Topor, L., & Topor, L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197580349.002.0005
CARAVANA "LUAR DO SERTÃO": UNINDO POLOS DO MNPEF PARA O ENSINO DE FISICA E ASTRONOMIA NO NORDESTE
Scarano, S., Santos, C., Maia, A. F., Amôres, E. B., Nascimento, E. M., Sales, F. H. S., Júnior, F. A. P. A., Rêgo, H. H. A., da Nóbrega, M. L., FIGUEREDO, M. L. I., et al. (2022) · Revista do Professor de Física · doi:10.26512/rpf.v1i1.46014
Mingoia, J., & Busque, B. L. (2022) · Interactions Studies in Communication & Culture · doi:10.1386/iscc_00054_1
Irrationalität im Netz – Formen der Irrationalität in Online-Deliberation
Chlastak, M. (2024) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748943815-401
Verschwörungstheorien und Wissenschaftsleugnung
Minkin, D. (2024) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110788341-006
Conspiracy! Or, when bad things happen to good litigants in person
Leader, K. (2024) · Legal Studies · doi:10.1017/lst.2024.18
Sorci, G. (2024) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy8030100 · Cited by 1
“As Goertzel (1994) argues, conspiracy beliefs are associated with a monological belief system, meaning that those who endorse some conspiracy theories are more likely to believe in others.”
BackgroundDo stress and anxiety lead to belief in conspiracy theories?
Fox, N., & Williams, M. N. (2024) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17925.2
From Folklore to Conspiracy Beliefs: A Gramscian Approach to Conspiracy Theory Studies
Pozzoni, M. C., & Quattromini, G. (2024) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy8040145
The Empire of Beliefs and Digital Worlds : What Does Contemporary Science Say?
Bronner, G. (2024) · The Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville · doi:10.3138/ttr.45.2.11 · Cited by 1
Xu, H., Miro, C. J., Kim, E., & Myers, M. D. (2024) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/17480485241305316
“Importantly, the literature supports the notion of conspiracy theories as a monological belief system, with evidence indicating that individuals endorsing one conspiracy theory are inclined to also embrace others (Goertzel, 1994).”
Killian, J. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2446238
Aggressive COVID Vaccine Conspiracy Theories
Lunsford, K. (2024) · Risk, systems and decisions · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74062-6_23
Religiosity and University Students’ Attitudes About Vaccination Against COVID-19
Petrović, J., Šuvaković, U., & Nikolić, I. A. (2025) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16010058
Tam, L., & Kim, S. (2025) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102543
Pica, G., Leander, N. P., Nariman, H. S., Hadarics, M., Snook, D. W., Bélanger, J. J., Rullo, M., Mehrez, A., Pierro, A., Sutton, R. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075251327310
“…2014), and those with low socio-political control (Bruder et al., 2013), lower levels of education (Douglas et al., 2016), belief in a dangerous world (Moulding et al., 2016), relative deprivation (Bilewicz et al., 2013), anomie (Goertzel, 1994), and a lack of power (Abalakina-Paap et al., 1999).”
Navigating the Fake News Environment: Enhancing Media Literacy in the Digital Age
Rodrigues, T. V. (2025) · International Journal for Innovation Education and Research · doi:10.31686/ijier.vol13.iss1.4249 · Cited by 1
Bensley, D. A., Rodrigo, M. F., Bravo, M. J., & Jocoy, K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82644-3_4
Lietz, A. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13098
THE SOCIOLOGY OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES
Ganapathi, H. B. (2024) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.5050
COVİD-19 Vaccine Hesitancy:The Mediating Role of Psychological and Political Factors
Turkileri, N., & Yukaruç, U. (2025) · İzmir İktisat Dergisi · doi:10.24988/ije.1514150 · Cited by 3
“A number of studies have shown that conspiracy mentality (Goertzel, 1994) is related to vaccine hesitancy in general.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Goertzel, T.
- Corresponding author
- Goertzel, Ted
- ORCID
- Goertzel, Ted
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315116440
- Cited by
- 1,094
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, anomie, interpersonal trust, job insecurity, racial differences, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review