Cited by 589Misinformation and Its ImpactsParanormal Experiences and BeliefsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Beliefs in conspiracies

Abalakina‐Paap, Marina, Stephan, Walter G., Craig, Traci, Gregory, W. Larry·1999·Political Psychology

Abstract

This study used canonical correlation to examine the relationship of 11 individual difference variables to two measures of beliefs in conspiracies. Undergraduates were administered a questionnaire that included these two measures (beliefs in specific conspiracies and attitudes toward the existence of conspiracies) and scales assessing the 11 variables. High levels of anomie, authoritarianism, and powerlessness, along with a low level of self‐esteem, were related to beliefs in specific conspiracies, whereas high levels of external locus of control and hostility, along with a low level of trust, were related to attitudes toward the existence of conspiracies in general. These findings support the idea that beliefs in conspiracies are related to feelings of alienation, powerlessness, hostility, and being disadvantaged. There was no support for the idea that people believe in conspiracies because they provide simplified explanations of complex events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0162-895x.00160

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conspiracy theories are not only a symptom but also a cause of the feelings of alienation and anomie with which they are correlated.

    “Thus, it is plausible that they are not only a symptom but also a cause of the feelings of alienation and anomie—a feeling of personal unrest and lack of understanding of the social world—with which they are correlated (e.g., Abalakina-Paap et al., 1999).”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Abalakina-Paap et al., 1999

  • Powerlessness is associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories.

    “Research has demonstrated that powerlessness is associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories [22], [31]”
  • Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism.

    “Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism [8], [20], [31], [50]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abalakina‐Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L.
Affiliations
  • New Mexico State University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
637-647
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W2160755447
Cited by
589
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
conspiracy beliefs, individual differences, anomie, authoritarianism, powerlessness, self-esteem, external locus of control, hostility, trust, alienation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review