Cited by 476Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetics and Physical PerformanceNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Low Physical Activity Accentuates the Effect of the FTO rs9939609 Polymorphism on Body Fat Accumulation

Open access
Andreasen, Camilla H., Stender-Petersen, Kirstine L., Mogensen, Mette S., Torekov, Signe S., Wegner, Lise, Andersen, Gitte, Nielsen, Arne L., Albrechtsen, Anders +9 more·2008·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—Three independent studies have shown that variation in the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene associates with BMI and obesity. In the present study, the effect of FTO variation on metabolic traits including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and related quantitative phenotypes was examined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The FTO rs9939609 polymorphism was genotyped in a total of 17,508 Danes from five different study groups. RESULTS—In studies of 3,856 type 2 diabetic case subjects and 4,861 normal glucose-tolerant control subjects, the minor A-allele of rs9939609 associated with type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 1.13 [95% CI 1.06–1.20], P = 9 × 10−5). This association was abolished when adjusting for BMI (1.06 [0.97–1.16], P = 0.2). Among 17,162 middle-aged Danes, the A-allele associated with overweight (1.19 [1.13–1.24], P = 1 × 10−12) and obesity (1.27 [1.20–1.34], P = 2 × 10−16). Furthermore, obesity-related quantitative traits such as body weight, waist circumference, fat mass, and fasting serum leptin levels were significantly elevated in A-allele carriers. An interaction between the FTO rs9939609 genotype and physical activity (P = 0.007) was found, where physically inactive homozygous risk A-allele carriers had a 1.95 ± 0.3 kg/m2 increase in BMI compared with homozygous T-allele carriers. CONCLUSIONS—We validate that variation in FTO is associated with type 2 diabetes when not adjusted for BMI and with an overall increase in body fat mass. Furthermore, low physical activity seems to accentuate the effect of FTO rs9939609 on body fat accumulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db07-0910

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physically inactive homozygous risk A-allele carriers in rs9939609 had a 2 kg/m2 greater BMI compared with homozygous T-allele carriers in a cross-sectional study of 17,000 Danes.

    “Physically inactive homozygous risk A-allele in rs9939609 carriers had a 2 kg/m2 greater BMI compared with homozygous T-allele carriers in a cross-sectional study of 17,000 Danes (14).”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreasen, C. H., Stender-Petersen, K. L., Mogensen, M. S., Torekov, S. S., Wegner, L., Andersen, G., Nielsen, A. L., Albrechtsen, A., Borch-Johnsen, K., Rasmussen, S. S., Clausen, J. O., Sandbæk, A., Lauritzen, T., Hansen, L., Jørgensen, T., Pedersen, O., & Hansen, T.
Affiliations
  • Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Glostrup Hospital (DK)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
95-101
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2166884301
Cited by
476
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 37
FWCI
27.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Velux Stiftung
  • Strategiske Forskningsråd (2101-06-0005)
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
  • European Commission (LSHM‐CT‐2005‐018734)
  • A.P. Møller og Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møllers Fond til almene Formaal
  • Diabetesforeningen
  • Medical Research Council
  • Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
FTO, rs9939609 polymorphism, type 2 diabetes, obesity, body fat accumulation, physical activity, gene-environment interaction, body mass index, waist circumference, fat mass, leptin, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Genotype, Humans, Oxo-Acid-Lyases, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reference Values, Genetic Variation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio, Glucose Intolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review