Cited by 107Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased Skeletal Muscle Capillarization Independently Enhances Insulin Sensitivity in Older Adults After Exercise Training and Detraining

Open access

Abstract

Intramuscular signaling and glucose transport mechanisms contribute to improvements in insulin sensitivity after aerobic exercise training. This study tested the hypothesis that increases in skeletal muscle capillary density (CD) also contribute to exercise-induced improvements in whole-body insulin sensitivity (insulin-stimulated glucose uptake per unit plasma insulin [M/I]) independent of other mechanisms. The study design included a 6-month aerobic exercise training period followed by a 2-week detraining period to eliminate short-term effects of exercise on intramuscular signaling and glucose transport. Before and after exercise training and detraining, 12 previously sedentary older (65 ± 3 years) men and women underwent research tests, including hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps and vastus lateralis biopsies. Exercise training increased Vo2max (2.2 ± 0.2 vs. 2.5 ± 0.2 L/min), CD (313 ± 13 vs. 349 ± 18 capillaries/mm2), and M/I (0.041 ± 0.005 vs. 0.051 ± 0.007 μmol/kg fat-free mass/min) (P < 0.05 for all). Exercise training also increased the insulin activation of glycogen synthase by 60%, GLUT4 expression by 16%, and 5′ AMPK-α1 expression by 21%, but these reverted to baseline levels after detraining. Conversely, CD and M/I remained 15% and 18% higher after detraining, respectively (P < 0.05), and the changes in M/I (detraining minus baseline) correlated directly with changes in CD in regression analysis (partial r = 0.70; P = 0.02). These results suggest that an increase in CD is one mechanism contributing to sustained improvements in glucose metabolism after aerobic exercise training.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db14-1771

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 59 references

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Andres, 1966, Manual feedback technique for the control of blood glucose concentration, 489

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Metadata

Authors
Prior, S. J., Goldberg, A. P., Ortmeyer, H. K., Chin, E. R., Chen, D., Blumenthal, J. B., & Ryan, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Prior, Steven J.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2015-06-11
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
3386-3395
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2147920255
Cited by
107
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 2
FWCI
24.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23-AG040775, P30-AG028747)
  • American Federation for Aging Research
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30-DK072488)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
insulin sensitivity, aerobic exercise training, detraining, older adults, glucose uptake, glycogen synthase, GLUT4, AMPK, glucose transport, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, vastus lateralis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Capillaries, Female, Glucose, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review