Cited by 186Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Objectively Measured Moderate- and Vigorous-Intensity Physical Activity but Not Sedentary Time Predicts Insulin Resistance in High-Risk Individuals

Open access
Ekelund, Ulf, Brage, Soren, Griffin, Simon J., Wareham, Nicholas J.·2009·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low levels of physical activity appear to be associated with insulin resistance. However, the detailed associations of these complex relationships remain elusive. We examined the prospective associations between self-reported TV viewing time, objectively measured time spent sedentary, at light-intensity activity, and at moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) with insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 192 individuals (81 men and 111 women) with a family history of type 2 diabetes, we measured physical activity and anthropometric and metabolic variables at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up in the ProActive UK trial. Physical activity was measured objectively by accelerometry. Insulin resistance was expressed as fasting insulin and the homeostasis model assessment score (HOMA-IR). RESULTS: Baseline MVPA was a significant predictor of fasting insulin at follow-up (β = −0.004 [95% CI −0.007 to −0.0001], P = 0.022), and the association approached significance for HOMA-IR (β = −0.003 [−0.007 to 0.000002], P = 0.052), independent of time spent sedentary, at light-intensity activity, sex, age, smoking status, waist circumference, and self-reported TV viewing. Time spent sedentary and at light-intensity activity were not significantly associated with insulin resistance. The change in MVPA between baseline and follow-up was inversely related to fasting insulin (β = −0.003 [−0.007 to −0.0003], P = 0.032) and the HOMA-IR score (β = −0.004 [−0.008 to −0.001], P = 0.015) at follow-up, after adjustment for baseline phenotype in addition to the same confounders as above. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of promoting moderate-intensity activity such as brisk walking for improving insulin sensitivity and possibly other metabolic risk factors to prevent type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc08-1895

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data from several studies using accelerometers to objectively measure sedentary behavior show unfavourable associations with risk factors.

    “There do exist data from several studies that used accelerometers to objectively measure sedentary behavior, showing unfavourable associations with risk factors (e.g., the Australian AusDiab study,[24] the Proactiv UK trial,[25] the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey[26]).”
  • Most analyses to date integrate acceleration data from the vertical axis only into counts per user-specified time period and utilize cutpoints for classifying time spent in sedentary behaviour or physical activity, which are then related to health outcomes.

    “Most analyses to date integrate acceleration data from the vertical axis only into counts per user-specified time period (e.g., counts per minute, cpm) and utilize cutpoints for classifying time spent in sedentary behaviour or physical activity (higher cpm reflects higher intensity activities), which are then related to health outcomes.[24-26]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekelund, U., Brage, S., Griffin, S. J., & Wareham, N. J.
Affiliations
  • MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
  • Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, U.K.
Corresponding author
Ekelund, Ulf
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-02-27
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1081-1086
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1973332708
Cited by
186
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Diabetes UK
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
insulin resistance, sedentary behavior, light physical activity, television viewing, type 2 diabetes prevention, family history of type 2 diabetes, accelerometry, HOMA-IR, fasting insulin, brisk walking
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Aging, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Life Style, Male, Motor Activity, Predictive Value of Tests, Rest, Risk Factors, Smoking, Television, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Evidence-Based Medicine, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review