Cited by 62Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Trends of Earlier and Later Responses of C-peptide to Oral Glucose Challenges With Progression to Type 1 Diabetes in Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Participants

Open access
Sosenko, Jay M., Palmer, Jerry P., Rafkin, Lisa E., Krischer, Jeffrey P., Cuthbertson, David, Greenbaum, Carla J., Eisenbarth, George, Skyler, Jay S. +1 more·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied the C-peptide response to oral glucose with progression to type 1 diabetes in Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) participants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Among 504 DPT-1 participants <15 years of age, longitudinal analyses were performed in 36 progressors and 80 nonprogressors. Progressors had oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) at baseline and every 6 months from 2.0 to 0.5 years before diagnosis; nonprogressors had OGTTs over similar intervals before their last visit. Sixty-six progressors and 192 nonprogressors were also studied proximal to and at diagnosis. RESULTS: The 30–0 min C-peptide difference from OGTTs performed 2.0 years before diagnosis in progressors was lower than the 30–0 min C-peptide difference from OGTTs performed 2.0 years before the last visit in nonprogressors (P < 0.01) and remained lower over time. The 90–60 min C-peptide difference was positive at every OGTT before diagnosis in progressors, whereas it was negative at every OGTT before the last visit in nonprogressors (P < 0.01 at 2.0 years). The percentage whose peak C-peptide occurred at 120 min was higher in progressors at 2.0 years (P < 0.05); this persisted over time (P < 0.001 at 0.5 years). However, the peak C-peptide levels were only significantly lower at 0.5 years in progressors (P < 0.01). The timing of the peak C-peptide predicted type 1 diabetes (P < 0.001); peak C-peptide levels were less predictive (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A decreased early C-peptide response to oral glucose and an increased later response occur at least 2 years before the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-1770

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metabolic changes in the natural history of type 1 diabetes are marked by decreased early C-peptide response at least 2 years before onset, increased glucose fluctuations as an individual approaches onset, and an overall linear rise, with a last-minute surge, in plasma glucose in the months before onset.

    “Metabolic changes in the natural history of type 1 diabetes are marked by decreased early C-peptide response at least 2 years before onset,80 increased glucose fluctuations as an individual approaches onset,81 and an overall linear rise, with a last-minute surge, in plasma glucose in”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [80]

    Split into 3 atoms — 1 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sosenko, J. M., Palmer, J. P., Rafkin, L. E., Krischer, J. P., Cuthbertson, D., Greenbaum, C. J., Eisenbarth, G., Skyler, J. S., & Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Benaroya Research Institute (US)
  • HLA/DNA Laboratory, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Corresponding author
Sosenko, Jay M.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-12-23
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
620-625
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2164825249
Cited by
62
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CERN
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK061034, UC4DK117009)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, C-peptide response, oral glucose tolerance test, prediabetes, disease progression, early biomarkers, insulin secretion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prediabetic State, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review