Cited by 38Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Glucose Excursions Between States of Glycemia With Progression to Type 1 Diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1)

Open access
Sosenko, Jay M., Skyler, Jay S., Krischer, Jeffrey P., Greenbaum, Carla J., Mahon, Jeffrey, Rafkin, Lisa E., Cuthbertson, David, Cowie, Catherine +4 more·2010·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We characterized fluctuations between states of glycemia in progressors to type 1 diabetes and studied whether those fluctuations are related to the early C-peptide response to oral glucose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) from differing states of glycemia were compared within individuals for glucose and C-peptide. Dysglycemic OGTTs (DYSOGTTs) were compared with normal OGTTs (NLOGTT), while transient diabetic OGTTs (TDOGTTs) were compared with subsequent nondiabetic OGTTs and with OGTTs performed at diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 135 progressors with four or more OGTTs, 30 (22%) went from NLOGTTs to DYSOGTTs at least twice. Area under the curve (AUC) glucose values from the second NLOGTT were higher (P < 0.001) than values from the first NLOGTT. Among 98 progressors whose DYSOGTTs and NLOGTTs were synchronized for the time before diagnosis, despite higher glucose levels (P < 0.01 at all time points) in the DYSOGTTs, 30- to 0-min C-peptide difference values changed little. Likewise, 30- to 0-min C-peptide difference values did not differ between TDOGTTs and subsequent (within 3 months) nondiabetic OGTTs in 55 progressors. In contrast, as glucose levels increased overall from the first to last OGTTs before diagnosis (P < 0.001 at every time point, n = 207), 30- to 0-min C-peptide difference values decreased (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Glucose levels fluctuate widely as they gradually increase overall with progression to type 1 diabetes. As glucose levels increase, the early C-peptide response declines. In contrast, glucose fluctuations are not related to the early C-peptide response. This suggests that changes in insulin sensitivity underlie the glucose fluctuations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db10-0534

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metabolic changes in the natural history of type 1 diabetes are marked by decreased early C-peptide response at least 2 years before onset, increased glucose fluctuations as an individual approaches onset, and an overall linear rise, with a last-minute surge, in plasma glucose in the months before onset.

    “Metabolic changes in the natural history of type 1 diabetes are marked by decreased early C-peptide response at least 2 years before onset,80 increased glucose fluctuations as an individual approaches onset,81 and an overall linear rise, with a last-minute surge, in plasma glucose in”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [81]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sosenko, J. M., Skyler, J. S., Krischer, J. P., Greenbaum, C. J., Mahon, J., Rafkin, L. E., Cuthbertson, D., Cowie, C., Herold, K., Eisenbarth, G., Palmer, J. P., & the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Benaroya Research Institute (US)
  • Western University (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • HLA/DNA Laboratory, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Sosenko, Jay M.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2010-08-03
Volume
59
Issue
10
Pages
2386-2389
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2114039266
Cited by
38
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK085476, U01DK061034, UC4DK117009)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
glycemic excursions, glycemic variability, C-peptide response, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin sensitivity, prediabetes, diabetes prevention
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Prediabetic State, Reference Values, Disease Progression, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review