Cited by 215Diabetes Management and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and Research

TeleHealth Improves Diabetes Self-Management in an Underserved Community

Open access
Davis, Richard M., Hitch, Angela D., Salaam, Muhammad M., Herman, William H., Zimmer-Galler, Ingrid E., Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J.·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a 1-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate a remote comprehensive diabetes self-management education (DSME) intervention, Diabetes TeleCare, administered by a dietitian and nurse/certified diabetes educator (CDE) in the setting of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in rural South Carolina. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from three member health centers of an FQHC and were randomized to either Diabetes TeleCare, a 12-month, 13-session curriculum delivered using telehealth strategies, or usual care. RESULTS: Mixed linear regression model results for repeated measures showed a significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin (GHb) in the Diabetes TeleCare group from baseline to 6 and 12 months (9.4 ± 0.3, 8.3 ± 0.3, and 8.2 ± 0.4, respectively) compared with usual care (8.8 ± 0.3, 8.6 ± 0.3, and 8.6 ± 0.3, respectively). LDL cholesterol was reduced at 12 months in the Diabetes TeleCare group compared with usual care. Although not part of the original study design, GHb was reduced from baseline to 12 and 24 months in the Diabetes TeleCare group (9.2 ± 0.4, 7.4 ± 0.5, and 7.6 ± 0.5, respectively) compared with usual care (8.7 ± 0.4, 8.1 ± 0.4, and 8.1 ± 0.5, respectively) in a post hoc analysis of a subset of the randomized sample who completed a 24-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth effectively created access to successfully conduct a 1-year remote DSME by a nurse CDE and dietitian that improved metabolic control and reduced cardiovascular risk in an ethnically diverse and rural population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-1919

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352: 854– 865 9742977
  2. [2]UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352: 837– 853 9742976
  3. [3]American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes: 2009. Diabetes Care 2009; 32(Suppl. 1) 1: S13– S61 19118286 PMC2613589
  4. [4]Shojania KG Ranji SR McDonald KM Grimshaw JM Sundaram V Rushakoff RJ Owens DK Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006; 296: 427– 440 16868301
  5. [6]Meigs JB Cagliero E Dubey A Murphy-Sheehy P Gildesgame C Chueh H Barry MJ Singer DE Nathan DM A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 750– 757 12610033
  6. [7]Montori VM Dinneen SF Gorman CA Zimmerman BR Rizza RA Bjornsen SS Green EM Bryant SC Smith SA the Translation Project Investigator Group The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1952– 1957 12401738
  7. [8]Izquierdo RE Knudson PE Meyer S Kearns J Ploutz-Snyder R Weinstock RS A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1002– 1007 12663564
  8. [9]Shea S Weinstock RS Teresi JA Palmas W Starren J Cimino JJ Lai AM Field L Morin PC Goland R Izquierdo RE Ebner S Silver S Petkova E Kong J Eimicke JP the IDEATEL Consortium A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year results of the IDEATel study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 446– 456 19390093 PMC2705246
  9. [11]Davis RM Hitch AD Nichols M Rizvi A Salaam M Mayer-Davis EJ A collaborative approach to the recruitment and retention of minority patients with diabetes in rural community health centers. Contemp Clinical Trials 2009; 30: 63– 70 18824135
  10. [12]Hurley AC The Health Belief Model: evaluation of a diabetes scale. Diabetes Educ 1990; 16: 44– 48 2311499
  11. [13]Zimmerman GL Olsen CG Bosworth MF A “stage of change” approach to helping patients change behavior. Am Fam Phys 2000; 61: 1409– 1416 10735346
  12. [16]American Diabetes Association Clinical practice recommendations 2008. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(Suppl. 1): S3– S4 7698058
  13. [18]Parra-Medina D D'Antonio AM Smith SM Levin S Kirkner G Mayer-Davis EJ Successful recruitment and retention strategies for a randomized weight management trial for persons with diabetes living in rural, medically underserved counties of South Carolina: the POWER study. J Am Diet Assoc 2004; 104: 70– 75 14702587
  14. [19]American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2009. Diabetes Care 2009; 32(Suppl. 1): S13– S61 19118286 PMC2613589
  15. [20]Moreno L Dale SB Chen AY Magee CA Costs to Medicare of the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATEL) home telemedicine demonstration: findings from an independent evaluation. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1202– 1204 19366971 PMC2699734

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, R. M., Hitch, A. D., Salaam, M. M., Herman, W. H., Zimmer-Galler, I. E., & Mayer-Davis, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Corresponding author
Davis, Richard M.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2010-05-18
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
1712-1717
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2141936258
Cited by
215
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK067312)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
telemedicine, diabetes self-management education, HbA1c, glycemic control, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, certified diabetes educator, dietitians, federally qualified health centers, remote intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Rural Population, Self Care, South Carolina, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review