Cited by 86Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Evaluation of the clinical outcomes of telehealth for managing diabetes: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

Open access
Wu, Cong, Wu, Zixiang, Yang, Lingfei, Zhu, Wenjun, Zhang, Meng, Zhu, Qian, Chen, Xiaoying, Pan, Yongmiao·2018·Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of telehealth and usual care in the management of diabetes. Methods: Multiple strategies, including database searches (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL), searches of related journals and reference tracking, were employed to widely search publications from January 2005 to December 2017. The change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels was assessed as the primary outcome, and changes in blood pressure, blood lipids, body mass index (BMI), and quality of life were examined as secondary outcomes. Results: Nineteen randomized controlled trials (n = 6294 participants) were selected. Telehealth was more effective than usual care in controlling the glycemic index in diabetes patients (weighted mean difference = −0.22%; 95% confidence intervals, −0.28 to −0.15; P < .001). This intervention showed promise in reducing systolic blood pressure levels (P < .001) and diastolic blood pressure levels (P < .001), while no benefits were observed in the control of BMI (P = .79). For total cholesterol and quality of life, telehealth was similar or superior to usual care. Conclusion: Telehealth holds promise for improving the clinical effectiveness of diabetes management. Targeting patients with higher HbA1c (≥9%) levels and delivering more frequent intervention (at least 6 times 1 year) may achieve greater improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000012962

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Shuster JJ Julian PT Review: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews for interventions, Version 5.1.0, published 3/2011. Higgins and Sally Green. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011 126– 30. Vol 2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C., Wu, Z., Yang, L., Zhu, W., Zhang, M., Zhu, Q., Chen, X., & Pan, Y.
Affiliations
  • Women's Hospital (US)
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Pan, Yongmiao
Venue
Medicine
Published
2018-10
Volume
97
Issue
43
Pages
e12962
ISSN
  • 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5964
OpenAlex
W2898519972
Cited by
86
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
telemedicine, diabetes management, glycemic control, HbA1c, blood pressure, serum lipids, body mass index, quality of life, usual care comparison, remote patient monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Quality of Life, Body Mass Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review