Cited by 58Dietary Effects on HealthDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Metabolic effects of alterations in meal frequency in type 2 diabetes

Arnold, Leeanne, Mann, Jim I, Ball, Madeleine J·1997·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effects of altering meal frequency on measures of glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes were examined by comparing isocaloric dietary regimens in which daily food intake was provided by three or nine meals each day. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 13 free-living men and women with type 2 diabetes or persistently impaired glucose tolerance participated in a randomized crossover study in which three- and nine-meal regimes were followed for 4-week periods. Fasting plasma lipid and lipoprotein, glucose and insulin concentrations were measured at weekly intervals and glucose, insulin, and triglyceride responses following a 75-g glucose load at weeks 2 and 4 of each diet period. Dietary intake was also recorded during these weeks. RESULTS: Nutrient intakes and all measures of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism were similar on the three- and nine-meal regimes. CONCLUSIONS: This longer-term study could not confirm the potential benefits of increased meal frequency suggested by comparable 4-week studies in type 2 diabetic individuals and acute experiments in individuals with diabetes. However, as there were no adverse effects of consuming nine meals per day, it would seem appropriate that meal frequency in those with type 2 diabetes should be left to personal choice, provided that energy balance is maintained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.20.11.1651

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical trials, both short-term and long-term, with or without caloric restriction, in various populations, have produced contradictory results regarding the association of meal frequency with body weight, postprandial glycemia, insulin resistance, and overall glycemic control.

    “Clinical trials, both short-term (14–28 days) [321,325,328,329,330,331,332] and long-term [323,324] with no caloric restriction in non-obese and obese women with PCO syndrome at an early or late stage IGT or overt early-stage T2DM, and long-term studies with caloric restriction in T2DM without [333] or with antidiabetic treatment [320,326], have produced contradictory results regarding the associ”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, L., Mann, J. I., & Ball, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1997-11-01
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1651-1654
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2135773336
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
meal frequency, type 2 diabetes, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, insulin response, glucose tolerance, isocaloric diet, fasting lipids, lipoproteins, energy balance, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Insulin, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Glucose Intolerance, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review