Cited by 224Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

A Pilot Study of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

Open access
Kaufman, Francine R., Gibson, Leena C., Halvorson, Mary, Carpenter, Sue, Fisher, Lynda K., Pitukcheewanont, Pisit·2001·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To determine whether the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) (MiniMed, Sylmar, CA) could be used to make clinical decisions and whether it has an impact on glycemia in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Pediatric subjects were recruited if they had HbA1c >8.0% with management problems (n = 35) or episodes of severe or nocturnal hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness associated with HbA1c ≤8.0% (n = 12). A total of 47 patients with a mean HbA1c value of 8.6 ± 1.6% (mean age 11.8 ± 4.6 years, youngest 2.7 years, and diabetes duration 5.5 ± 3.5 years) on three to four insulin injections/day (n = 24) or insulin pump therapy (n = 23) were followed with the CGMS for a mean of 69.5 ± 28 h. Comparisons were made between the number of high (>150 mg/dl) and low (<70 mg/dl) glucose patterns discerned with the sensor or the logbook, and HbA1c levels were evaluated. RESULTS—In patients on injection therapy, 30 high or low glucose patterns were discerned with the logbook records and 120 patterns with the CGMS. Specific alterations of the diabetes regimen were made. An overall significant change in HbA1c, from 3 months before wearing the sensor to 6 months after (analysis of variance 0.04), was found in the subjects. Post hoc analysis showed a significant change in HbA1c from 8.6 ± 1.5% at baseline to 8.4 ± 1.3% at 3 months (paired Student’s t test 0.03). CONCLUSIONS—The CGMS can be used by pediatric patients to detect abnormal patterns of glycemia. The information that was obtained could be used to alter the diabetes regimen and impact glycemic outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.24.12.2030

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufman, F. R., Gibson, L. C., Halvorson, M., Carpenter, S., Fisher, L. K., & Pitukcheewanont, P.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
2030-2034
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2153484029
Cited by
224
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Genentech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes in children, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, insulin pump therapy, insulin injection therapy, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Injections, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Pilot Projects, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review