Cited by 44Food composition and propertiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

High-Fiber Cereal Reduces Postprandial Insulin Responses in Hyperinsulinemic but not Normoinsulinemic Subjects

Open access
Wolever, Thomas M.S., Campbell, Janice E., Geleva, Daniela, Anderson, G. Harvey·2004·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The objective of this study was to compare the plasma glucose and insulin responses elicited by two ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (one being high and the other being low in cereal fiber) and to see if the differences in response depended on subjects’ fasting plasma insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Nondiabetic men (n = 77) were studied on two occasions after 10- to 14-h overnight fasts. They consumed 25 g of available carbohydrate from high- or low-fiber breakfast cereals in random order with blood taken at intervals for 2 h. Data from the 42 men with high fasting plasma insulin (FPI) on screening (>40 pmol/l) were compared with those from the 35 men with normal FPI (≤40 pmol/l). RESULTS—Hyperinsulinemic men had significantly higher waist circumference and BMI, lower HDL cholesterol, and a trend toward higher triglycerides (P = 0.07) than control subjects. In all 77 subjects, the incremental area under the glucose response curve (AUC) after high-fiber cereal was 11.8 ± 5.5% (P = 0.036) less than after low-fiber cereal with the reductions being equivalent in the hyperinsulinemic (12.6 ± 8.3%) and control (10.9 ± 9.1%) groups. However, insulin peak rise was reduced by the high-fiber cereal only in hyperinsulinemic men (351 ± 29 vs. 485 ± 55 pmol/l) but not in control subjects (211 ± 20 vs. 220 ± 20 pmol/l; cereal × group interaction P = 0.044). Insulin AUC after the high-fiber cereal, expressed as a percentage of that after low-fiber cereal, was negatively related to FPI (P = 0.009) but not to age, BMI, or waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS—The high-fiber cereal reduced glucose responses to the same extent in normal and hyperinsulinemic men, but reduced insulin responses only in hyperinsulinemic subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1281

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An insulin index is likely to be influenced by the pathophysiological status of the test subject.

    “Moreover, an insulin index is likely to be influenced by the pathophysiological status of the test subject (Wolever et al. 2004).”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Wolever et al. 2004

  • In an interlaboratory GI study, laboratories using venous blood returned CI of 50%, compared with 30% in laboratories using capillary blood.

    “This has been confirmed directly in the interlaboratory study of GI, in which laboratories taking venous blood returned CI of .50 %, compared with , 30 % in all laboratories using capillary blood (Wolever et al. 2002(Wolever et al. , 2004)).”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Wolever et al. 2004

    The Research Design and Methods passages (page not supplied) describe a single study comparing responses to high- and low-fiber cereals, not an interlaboratory GI study. Searches for venous versus capillary blood and the claimed 50% versus 30% confidence intervals found no passage addressing that comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kritchevsky D, Bonfield C, Eds. St. Paul, MN, Eagan Press, 1995, p. 360 -377

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolever, T. M. S., Campbell, J. E., Geleva, D., & Anderson, G. H.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • General Mills (United States) (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1281-1285
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2118573223
Cited by
44
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • General Mills
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
dietary fiber, postprandial insulin response, hyperinsulinemia, fasting insulin, plasma glucose response, insulin sensitivity, dyslipidemia, waist circumference
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adult, Aged, Edible Grain, Dietary Fiber, Fasting, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Insulin, Kinetics, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review