Cited by 670Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and Education

A desktop guide to Type 2 diabetes mellitus

European Diabetes Policy Group, 1999·1999·Diabetic Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00166.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
European Diabetes Policy Group, 1.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
716-730
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W3109617681
Cited by
670
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes management, patient education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review