Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxidative Stress, Gene Expression, and Protein Changes Induced in the Human Placenta during Labor

Open access
Cindrova-Davies, Tereza, Yung, Hong-Wa, Johns, Jemma, Spasic-Boskovic, Olivera, Korolchuk, Svitlana, Jauniaux, Eric, Burton, Graham J., Charnock-Jones, D. Stephen·2007·The American Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Malperfusion of the placenta has been implicated as a cause of oxidative stress in complications of human pregnancy, leading to release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-angiogenic factors into the maternal circulation. Uterine contractions during labor are known to be associated with intermittent utero-placental perfusion. We therefore tested whether oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic regulators were increased in placentas subjected to short (<5hrs) and long (>15hrs) labor compared with non-labored controls delivered by caesarean section. In addition, broader changes in gene transcripts were assessed by microarray analysis. Oxidative stress, activation of the nuclear factor-κB pathway, tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 1β all increased in placental tissues following labor. Stabilization of hypoxia inducible factor 1α and increased vascular endothelial growth factor soluble receptor-1 were also observed. By contrast, tissue levels of placenta growth factor decreased. Apoptosis was also activated in labored placentas. The magnitude of these changes related to the duration of labor. Following labor, 55 gene transcripts were up-regulated and 35 down-regulated, and many of these changes were reflected at the protein level. In conclusion, labor is a powerful inducer of placental oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic regulators. Our findings are consistent with intermittent perfusion being the initiating cause. Placentas subjected to labor do not reflect the normal in vivo state at the molecular level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070528

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Cindrova-Davies, T., Yung, H.-W., Johns, J., Spasic-Boskovic, O., Korolchuk, S., Jauniaux, E., Burton, G. J., & Charnock-Jones, D. S.
Venue
The American Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
171
Issue
4
Pages
1168-1179
ISSN
0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137248860
Cited by
297
References
8
FWCI
16.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.