Cited by 39Ovarian function and disordersVitamin D Research StudiesSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Associations between vitamin D levels and polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes

Open access
Davis, Erin M., Peck, Jennifer D., Hansen, Karl R., Neas, Barbara R., Craig, LaTasha B.·2019·Minerva Endocrinologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have produced inconsistent results. Additionally, no previous studies have evaluated associations between vitamin D and specific PCOS phenotypes. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted among women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Cases (N.=137) were diagnosed with PCOS and then further classified into 3 diagnostic phenotypes based on combinations of the Rotterdam criteria (ovulatory dysfunction+polycystic ovaries [N.=55]; ovulatory dysfunction +androgen excess [N.=15]; and ovulatory dysfunction, +polycystic ovaries, +androgen excess [N.=67]). Controls (N.=103) were ovulatory women without PCOS who were undergoing IUI. Serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were categorized as deficient (≤20 ng/mL), insufficient (21-29 ng/mL), and sufficient (≥30 ng/mL). Prevalence odds ratios (PORs) were calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A higher proportion (59.9%) of PCOS cases lacked sufficient vitamin D levels compared to controls (47.6%; P value=0.06). The odds of vitamin D deficiency in all PCOS cases were twice that of controls (POR=2.03, 95% CI 0.97-4.26); however, the association was attenuated after adjusting for Body Mass Index (BMI) and race/ethnicity (adjPOR=1.43, 95% CI 0.62, 3.26). When examining PCOS phenotypes exhibiting androgen excess, crude associations were observed for deficient vitamin D levels (unadjPOR=2.93, 95% CI: 1.27, 6.77); however, the association decreased after adjustment for BMI and race/ethnicity (adjPOR=2.03, 95% CI: 0.79, 5.19). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency occurred more frequently in PCOS cases with androgen excess, but associations were attenuated after adjusting for BMI and race/ethnicity. Combining etiologically distinct PCOS subgroups may obscure associations with lower vitamin D levels and other potential risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0391-1977.18.02824-9

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [28]Evidence-based Methodology Workshop on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Washington D.C.: Office of Disease Prevention and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health; 2012.
  2. [29]WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical mucus interaction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  3. [30]WHO laboratory manual for the Examination and processing of human semen Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  4. [32]Institue of Medicine Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2011
  5. [46]Greenland S, Lash T. Bias analysis. In: Rothman KG S, Lash T, eds. Modern Epidemiology 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, E. M., Peck, J. D., Hansen, K. R., Neas, B. R., & Craig, L. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Erin M.
Venue
Minerva Endocrinologica
Published
2019-05
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
176-184
ISSN
  • 0391-1977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1634
OpenAlex
W2945344744
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Minerva Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104938)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, PCOS phenotypes, hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction, body mass index, race and ethnicity, intrauterine insemination
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Insemination, Artificial, Phenotype, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Risk Factors, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Hyperandrogenism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review