Cited by 131Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical Analysis

MAGic: A Phanerozoic model for the geochemical cycling of major rock-forming components

Arvidson, R. S.·2006·American Journal of Science

Abstract

A dynamical model (MAGic) is presented that describes the elemental cycling of sedimentary materials involving sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, carbon, oxygen, iron, sulfur and phosphorous through much of the Phanerozoic. The model incorporates the basic reactions controlling atmospheric carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations, continental and seafloor weathering of silicate and carbonate rocks, net ecosystem productivity, basalt-seawater exchange reactions, precipitation and diagenesis of chemical sediments and authigenic silicates, oxidation-reduction reactions involving carbon, sulfur, and iron, and subduction-decarbonation reactions. Although MAGic contains feedback and forcing functions adapted from the GEOCARB models (Berner, 1991, 1994; Berner and Kothavala, 2001), these functions are incorporated in a reservoir-reaction scheme that is considerably more detailed. Coupled reservoirs include shallow and deep cratonic silicate and carbonate rocks and sediments, seawater, atmosphere, oceanic sediments and basalts, and the shallow mantle. Model results are reasonably consistent with recently published constraints provided by fluid inclusion, isotopic, floral, and mineralogical records. We have used these results to evaluate sensitivity to uncertainties in the history of the earth-ocean-atmosphere system over the past 500 Ma: the advent of pelagic carbonate sedimentation, the importance of burial versus early diagenetic dolomite formation, the importance of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2475/ajs.306.3.135

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seawater saturation state during Phanerozoic times responds, and is sensitive, to the magnitude of the marine dolomite depositional flux.

    “In addition, seawater saturation state during Phanerozoic times responds, and is sensitive, to the magnitude of the marine dolomite depositional flux (Arvidson et al., 2006).”

    From Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks (2014) · cites this paper as Arvidson et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arvidson, R. S.
Corresponding author
Arvidson, R. S.
Venue
American Journal of Science
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
306
Issue
3
Pages
135-190
ISSN
0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115554163
Cited by
131
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
MAGIC model, atmospheric CO2, ocean oxygen, continental weathering, seafloor weathering, carbon cycle, sulfur cycling, iron cycle, dolomite formation, seafloor spreading, seawater sulfate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review