The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychometric properties of the French versions of the Perceived Stress Scale
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the French versions of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and to compare the appropriateness of the three versions of this scale (14 items, 10 items, or 4 items) in a sample of workers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred and one workers were randomly selected in several occupational health care centers of the North of France during 2010. Participants completed a questionnaire including demographic variables and the PSS. The psychometric properties of this scale were analyzed: internal consistency, factorial structure, and discriminative sensibility. RESULTS: For the PSS-14 and PSS-10, the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) provided a two-factor structure, corresponding to the positively and negatively worded items. Those two factors were significantly correlated (r = 0.43 and 0.50, respectively). For the PSS-4, the EFA yielded a one-factor structure. The reliability was high for all three versions of the PSS (Cronbach's α values ranged from 0.73 to 0.84). The results concerning the effects of age, gender, marital, parental and occupational statuses showed that the 10-item version had the best discriminative sensibility. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirmed satisfactory psychometric properties of all the three French versions of the PSS. We recommend the use of the PSS-10 in research settings because of its good psychometric properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Psychometric Properties of a European Spanish Version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Remor, E. (2006) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1138741600006004 · Cited by 1,003
Leung, D. Y., Lam, T.-H., & Chan, S. S. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-513 · Cited by 562
Perceived stress in survivors of suicide: psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale.
Mitchell, A. M., Crane, P. A., & Kim, Y. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20284 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale
Lee, E.-H. (2012) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004 · Cited by 2,305
Wathelet, M., Duhem, S., Vaiva, G., Baubet, T., Habran, E., Veerapa, E., Debien, C., Molenda, S., Horn, M., Grandgenèvre, P., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25591 · Cited by 747
Klein, E. M., Brähler, E., Dreier, M., Reinecke, L., Müller, K. W., Schmutzer, G., Wölfling, K., & Beutel, M. E. (2016) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0875-9 · Cited by 716
Vallejo, M. A., Vallejo-Slocker, L., Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Mañanes, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00037 · Cited by 286
Web-Based and Mobile Stress Management Intervention for Employees: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Heber, E., Lehr, D., Ebert, D. D., Berking, M., & Riper, H. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5112 · Cited by 213
“Due to the fact that the PSS is not a diagnostic measurement and there is no official cut-off available, we decided to use one standard deviation (SD 6.2) above the mean (PSS-10=15.3) in a large working population [33] as a cut-off value to choose participants with an elevated level of stress.”
InfluentialPsychometric properties of the perceived stress scale in a community sample of Chinese
Huang, F., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Du, W., Su, C., Jia, X., Ouyang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02520-4 · Cited by 209
Ebert, D. D., Heber, E., Berking, M., Riper, H., Cuijpers, P., Funk, B., & Lehr, D. (2016) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2015-103269 · Cited by 176
Lee, E., Chung, B. Y., Suh, C., & Jung, J. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12131 · Cited by 134
Ng, S.-M. (2013) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/2050-7283-1-9 · Cited by 121
Costa, C., Briguglio, G., Mondello, S., Teodoro, M., Pollicino, M., Canalella, A., Verduci, F., Italia, S., & Fenga, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.640454 · Cited by 108
Coelhoso, C. C., Tobo, P. R., Lacerda, S. S., Lima, A. H., Barrichello, C. R. C., Amaro Jr, E., & Kozasa, E. H. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14269 · Cited by 95
Ebert, D. D., Lehr, D., Smit, F., Zarski, A.-C., Riper, H., Heber, E., Cuijpers, P., & Berking, M. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-807 · Cited by 82
Nixon, P., Boß, L., Heber, E., Ebert, D. D., & Lehr, D. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11504-2 · Cited by 43
“3) in a large sample of working people [58].”
BackgroundChouinard, A.-M., Larouche, E., Audet, M.-C., Hudon, C., & Goulet, S. (2019) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2018.1484890 · Cited by 35
Wiernik, E., Nabi, H., Thomas, F., Pannier, B., Hanon, O., Simon, T., Simon, J.-M., Danchin, N., Limosin, F., Czernichow, S., et al. (2016) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2016.01.004 · Cited by 20
(2022) · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.780498 · Cited by 15
Roslyakova, T., Falco, M.-A., & Gauchet, A. (2021) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2020.1856844 · Cited by 10
Servant, D., Leterme, A.-C., Barasino, O., Rougegrez, L., Duhamel, A., & Vaiva, G. (2017) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.7976 · Cited by 8
“The French version is used [56].”
Vivre un décès périnatal en contexte de pandémie
de Montigny, F., Verdon, C., Pierce, T., René, C., Landry, I., Corno, G., Murphy, M., & Silverio, S. A. (2023) · Études sur la mort · doi:10.3917/eslm.159.0123 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesage, F.-X., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178-84
- ISSN
- 1232-1087 (ISSN-L)
- 1896-494X
- OpenAlex
- W2157573937
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
