Cited by 270Sleep and Work-Related FatigueOccupational Health and Safety ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Shiftwork: Safety, Sleepiness and Sleep

Open access
FOLKARD, Simon, LOMBARDI, David A., TUCKER, Philip T.·2005·Industrial Health

Abstract

This brief paper reviews the available published literature on shiftwork and safety that allows the relative risk of "accidents" or injuries associated with specific features of shift systems to be estimated. Three main trends in risk are discussed, namely that (i) risk is higher on the night shift, and to a lesser extent the afternoon shift, than on the morning shift, (ii) risk increases over a span of shifts, especially so if they are night shifts, and (iii) risk increases with increasing shift length over eight hours. We discuss that some of these trends are not entirely consistent with predictions derived from considerations of the circadian variations in sleep propensity or rated sleepiness, and consider factors relating to sleep that may underlie the observed trends in risk. Finally, the practical implications of the trends in risk for the design of safer shift systems are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2486/indhealth.43.20

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tucker P, Sytnik N, Macdonald I, Folkard S (2000) Temporal determinants of accident risk: the "2-4 hour shift phenomenon". In: Shiftwork in the 21st Century. eds. by Hornberger S, Knauth P, Costa G, Folkard S, 99-105, Peter Lang, Frankfurt, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford and Wien.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FOLKARD, S., LOMBARDI, D. A., & TUCKER, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (US)
  • Swansea University (GB)
Venue
Industrial Health
Published
2005
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
20-23
ISSN
  • 0019-8366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-8026
OpenAlex
W1969943009
Cited by
270
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
19.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
shift work, occupational safety, night shift work, shift length, circadian rhythm, sleepiness, sleep propensity, crash risk, fatigue
MeSH terms
Accidents, Occupational, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Risk, Safety, Time, Work Schedule Tolerance, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review