The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Systems Success in the Context of Different Corporate Cultural Types: An Empirical Investigation
Abstract
Previous studies surrounding the DeLone and McLean model of information systems (IS) success have called for future research and further examination of its measure in different contexts. We draw from the literature on strategic IS planning and organizational culture to contextualize the DeLone and McLean model. There is some evidence that a high-quality information technology (IT) plan leads to system success; therefore, we empirically examine the inclusion of the IT plan quality construct as an antecedent to IS success. We also empirically examine the relationships among constructs in the model of IS success in the context of different corporate cultural types—entrepreneurial and formal. The results provide strong support for the research model and suggest that variations in IS success are explained by the quality of the IT plan and the corporate culture exhibited by a firm. We discuss implications related to our finding that IT plan quality has a greater impact on IS success in organizations that exhibit an entrepreneurial corporate culture than in those that exhibit a formal corporate culture. Furthermore, we discuss how the relationships in the DeLone and McLean model of IS success differ in diverse corporate cultural types and the meaning of these differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672 · cited 1×
“The first classification, sometimes referred to as entrepreneurial [25, 60], represents organizations with an emphasis on spontaneity, flexibility, and individuality [10, 38, 60].”
BackgroundAssessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
Cited by
Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001 · Cited by 965
The impact of legitimacy-based motives on IS adoption success: An institutional theory perspective
Krell, K., Matook, S., & Rohde, F. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, R., Pridmore, J., & Byrd, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-294
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021649466
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Systems Success in the Context of Different Corporate Cultural Types: An Empirical Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/mis0742-12222302011
- The paper
- Bradley, R., Pridmore, J., & Byrd, T. (2006). Information Systems Success in the Context of Different Corporate Cultural Types: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-12222302011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.