The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach
Abstract
The advent of the Internet has made the transmission of personally identifiable information more common and often unintended by the user. As personal information becomes more accessible, individuals worry that businesses misuse the information that is collected while they are online. Organizations have tried to mitigate this concern in two ways: (1) by offering privacy policies regarding the handling and use of personal information and (2) by offering benefits such as financial gains or convenience. In this paper, we interpret these actions in the context of the information-processing theory of motivation. Information-processing theories, also known as expectancy theories in the context of motivated behavior, are built on the premise that people process information about behavior-outcome relationships. By doing so, they are forming expectations and making decisions about what behavior to choose. Using an experimental setting, we empirically validate predictions that the means to mitigate privacy concerns are associated with positive valences resulting in an increase in motivational score. In a conjoint analysis exercise, 268 participants from the United States and Singapore face trade-off situations, where an organization may only offer incomplete privacy protection or some benefits. While privacy protections (against secondary use, improper access, and error) are associated with positive valences, we also find that financial gains and convenience can significantly increase individuals' motivational score of registering with a Web site. We find that benefits—monetary reward and future convenience—significantly affect individuals' preferences over Web sites with differing privacy policies. We also quantify the value of Web site privacy protection. Among U.S. subjects, protection against errors, improper access, and secondary use of personal information is worth $30.49-$44.62. Finally, our approach also allows us to identify three distinct segments of Internet users—privacy guardians, information sellers, and convenience seekers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.104 · Cited by 1,870
Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information
Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941 · Cited by 1,027
Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory
Laufer, R. S., & Wolfe, M. (1977) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01880.x · Cited by 993
An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument
Stewart, K. A., & Segars, A. H. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97 · Cited by 734
Culnan, M. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249775 · Cited by 618
Privacy: Recognition of a Consumer Right
Goodwin, C. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/074391569101000111 · Cited by 393
Stone, E. F., Gueutal, H. G., Gardner, D. G., & McClure, S. (1983) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.3.459 · Cited by 387
Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches
Milberg, S. J., Burke, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Kallman, E. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219663.219683 · Cited by 343 · cited 1×
“Comparing the coeffi cients (valences) between countries, we found that, consistent with previous research [17, 44], Singapore subjects were relatively more concerned about improper access and unauthorized secondary use than errors in storing information.”
ResultEffect of resource class on retaliation to injustice in interpersonal exchange
Donnenwerth, G. V., & Foa, U. G. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036201 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.2.442 · Cited by 1,283
Kokolakis, S. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002 · Cited by 1,229
Metadata
- Authors
- Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, S.-Y. T., & Png, I. P. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 13-42
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2119486295
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 41.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/mis0742-1222240202
- The paper
- Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, S.-Y. T., & Png, I. P. L. (2007). Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222240202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.