Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on symptom onset data, March 2020

Open access
Ganyani, Tapiwa, Kremer, Cécile, Chen, Dongxuan, Torneri, Andrea, Faes, Christel, Wallinga, Jacco, Hens, Niel·2020·Eurosurveillance

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Estimating key infectious disease parameters from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak is essential for modelling studies and guiding intervention strategies. Aim: We estimate the generation interval, serial interval, proportion of pre-symptomatic transmission and effective reproduction number of COVID-19. We illustrate that reproduction numbers calculated based on serial interval estimates can be biased. Methods: We used outbreak data from clusters in Singapore and Tianjin, China to estimate the generation interval from symptom onset data while acknowledging uncertainty about the incubation period distribution and the underlying transmission network. From those estimates, we obtained the serial interval, proportions of pre-symptomatic transmission and reproduction numbers. Results: The mean generation interval was 5.20 days (95% credible interval (CrI): 3.78–6.78) for Singapore and 3.95 days (95% CrI: 3.01–4.91) for Tianjin. The proportion of pre-symptomatic transmission was 48% (95% CrI: 32–67) for Singapore and 62% (95% CrI: 50–76) for Tianjin. Reproduction number estimates based on the generation interval distribution were slightly higher than those based on the serial interval distribution. Sensitivity analyses showed that estimating these quantities from outbreak data requires detailed contact tracing information. Conclusion: High estimates of the proportion of pre-symptomatic transmission imply that case finding and contact tracing need to be supplemented by physical distancing measures in order to control the COVID-19 outbreak. Notably, quarantine and other containment measures were already in place at the time of data collection, which may inflate the proportion of infections from pre-symptomatic individuals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.17.2000257

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Held L, Hens N, O’Neill PD, Wallinga J. Handbook of infectious disease data analysis. 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC;2019. · doi:10.1201/9781315222912
  2. Backer, 2020, Incubation period of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among travellers from Wuhan, China, 20-28 January 2020., Euro Surveill, 25, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.5.2000062 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Linton, 2020, Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: A statistical analysis of publicly available case data., J Clin Med, 9, 538, 10.3390/jcm9020538 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhang J, Litvinova M, Wang W, Wang Y, Deng X, Chen X, et al. Evolving epidemiology of novel coronavirus diseases 2019 and possible interruption of local transmission outside Hubei Province in China: a descriptive and modeling study. medRxiv. 2020;20026328: (Preprint). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.21.20026328 · doi:10.1101/2020.02.21.20026328
  5. Liu, 2020, Transmission dynamics of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)., SSRN, 3526307
  6. Britton, 2019, Estimation in emerging epidemics: biases and remedies., J R Soc Interface, 16, 10.1098/rsif.2018.0670 · DOI
  7. Wallinga, 2004, Different epidemic curves for severe acute respiratory syndrome reveal similar impacts of control measures., Am J Epidemiol, 160, 509, 10.1093/aje/kwh255 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hens, 2012, Robust reconstruction and analysis of outbreak data: influenza A(H1N1)v transmission in a school-based population., Am J Epidemiol, 176, 196, 10.1093/aje/kws006 · DOI
  9. te Beest, 2013, Estimating the generation interval of influenza A (H1N1) in a range of social settings., Epidemiology, 24, 244, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31827f50e8 · DOI
  10. Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes DC. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. McGraw-Hill; 1950.
  11. Robert CP, Casella G. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. New York: Springer; 2004. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wallinga, 2007, How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers., Proc Biol Sci, 274, 599
  13. Tindale LC, Coombe M, Stockdale JE, Garlock E, Lau WYV, Saraswat M, et al. Transmission interval estimates suggest pre-symptomatic spread of COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020;20029983: (Preprint). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20029983 · DOI
  14. Du, 2020, Serial interval of COVID-19 among publicly reported confirmed cases., Emerg Infect Dis, 26, 10.3201/eid2606.200357 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bell, 2004, Public health interventions and SARS spread, 2003., Emerg Infect Dis, 10, 1900, 10.3201/eid1011.040729 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Ganyani, T., Kremer, C., Chen, D., Torneri, A., Faes, C., Wallinga, J., & Hens, N.
Venue
Eurosurveillance
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
25
Issue
17
ISSN
  • 1025-496X (ISSN-L)
  • 1560-7917
OpenAlex
W3022825990
Cited by
640
References
3
FWCI
22.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on symptom onset data, March 2020. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.17.2000257
The paper
Ganyani, T., Kremer, C., Chen, D., Torneri, A., Faes, C., Wallinga, J., & Hens, N. (2020). Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on symptom onset data, March 2020. Eurosurveillance. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.17.2000257

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.