The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crip Technoscience Manifesto
Open accessAbstract
As disabled people engaged in disability community, activism, and scholarship, our collective experiences and histories have taught us that we are effective agents of world building and dismantling toward more socially just relations.The grounds for social justice and world remaking, however, are frictioned;technologies, architectures, and infrastructures are often designed and implemented without committing to disability as a difference that matters. This manifesto calls attention to the powerful, messy, non-innocent, contradictory, and nevertheless crucial work of what we name as “crip technoscience,” practices of critique, alteration, and reinvention of our material-discursive world. Disabled people are experts and designers of everyday life. But we also harness technoscience for political action, refusing to comply with demands to cure, fix, or eliminate disability. Attentive to the intersectional workings of power and privilege, we agitate against independence and productivity as requirements for existence. Instead, we center technoscientific activism and critical design practices that foster disability justice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“these scholars demonstrate how AI technologies similarly rely on the assumption that we need to “overcome” disability through technology rather than address the structural causes of inaccessibility and discrimination experienced by disabled people.”
From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Hamraie and Fritsch, 2019
In the citing paper
“In particular, higher education has been a key site of disability activism in North America [11, 21].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The politics of accommodations reflect broader neoliberal logics, which Hamraie and Fritsch [21] posit are the result of capitalist systems that instill values of self-sufficiency.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Building on this, Hamraie [21] highlights the failure of universities to accommodate disabled people that result in relational tensions, exposing the limits of existing infrastructure and its politics.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Hamraie [21] further argues that attempts to smooth over access so that infrastructure can be “frictionless” and adapted by students would depoliticize disability, obscuring embedded power relations.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“We acknowledge that intersectionality is a critical lens in Critical Disability Studies [21].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Individuals who directly encounter access frictions possess the situated knowledge [1, 21, 64] required to subvert and reactivate them as counteractive forces that confront university decision-makers [20].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20]”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Rather than making infrastructures and the design of services “frictionless” or “adaptive” for disabled communities — which is not possible nor desirable because disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20] — student groups strategically leverage points of disruption to confront authority, compel negotiations, and demand systemic change.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene
McKeithen, W. (2017) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1336302 · Cited by 3,949
States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order
Jasanoff, S. (2004) · Cited by 2,942
Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene
Haraway, D. (2016) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 2,246
Kafer, A. (2013) · doi:10.2979/6841.0 · Cited by 2,131
Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability
McRuer, R., & Bérubé, M. 1. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5344 · Cited by 1,868
Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge
(1997) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0297-242 · Cited by 1,666
Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience
Haraway, D., & Randolph, L. M. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,589
Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions
McDonald, B. C., de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Jathar, S. H., Akherati, A., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., Hayes, P. L., McKeen, S. A., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0524 · Cited by 1,373
TallBear, K. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816685776 · Cited by 1,139
Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment
Charlton, J. I. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0640 · Cited by 1,124
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ableism, technoableism, and future AI
Shew, A. (2020) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2020.2967492 · Cited by 201
Disability Expertise: Claiming Disability Anthropology
Hartblay, C. (2020) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/705781 · Cited by 137
Mills, M. C. 2. /. J., & Sanchez, R. (2023) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479819386.001.0001 · Cited by 115
Social Justice in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review
Chordia, I., Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., Boone, A., Sheehan, A., Dombrowski, L. S., Dantec, C. A. L., Ringland, K. E., & Smith, A. D. R. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642704 · Cited by 80
A New Era in Multimodal Learning Analytics: Twelve Core Commitments to Ground and Grow MMLA
Worsley, M. B., Martínez‐Maldonado, R., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.7361 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 2380-3312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944785538
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- disability justice, people with disabilities, critical design, intersectionality, social justice, disability studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
