The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crip Technoscience Manifesto
Open accessAbstract
As disabled people engaged in disability community, activism, and scholarship, our collective experiences and histories have taught us that we are effective agents of world building and dismantling toward more socially just relations.The grounds for social justice and world remaking, however, are frictioned;technologies, architectures, and infrastructures are often designed and implemented without committing to disability as a difference that matters. This manifesto calls attention to the powerful, messy, non-innocent, contradictory, and nevertheless crucial work of what we name as “crip technoscience,” practices of critique, alteration, and reinvention of our material-discursive world. Disabled people are experts and designers of everyday life. But we also harness technoscience for political action, refusing to comply with demands to cure, fix, or eliminate disability. Attentive to the intersectional workings of power and privilege, we agitate against independence and productivity as requirements for existence. Instead, we center technoscientific activism and critical design practices that foster disability justice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“these scholars demonstrate how AI technologies similarly rely on the assumption that we need to “overcome” disability through technology rather than address the structural causes of inaccessibility and discrimination experienced by disabled people.”
From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Hamraie and Fritsch, 2019
In the citing paper
“In particular, higher education has been a key site of disability activism in North America [11, 21].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The politics of accommodations reflect broader neoliberal logics, which Hamraie and Fritsch [21] posit are the result of capitalist systems that instill values of self-sufficiency.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Building on this, Hamraie [21] highlights the failure of universities to accommodate disabled people that result in relational tensions, exposing the limits of existing infrastructure and its politics.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Hamraie [21] further argues that attempts to smooth over access so that infrastructure can be “frictionless” and adapted by students would depoliticize disability, obscuring embedded power relations.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“We acknowledge that intersectionality is a critical lens in Critical Disability Studies [21].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Individuals who directly encounter access frictions possess the situated knowledge [1, 21, 64] required to subvert and reactivate them as counteractive forces that confront university decision-makers [20].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20]”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Rather than making infrastructures and the design of services “frictionless” or “adaptive” for disabled communities — which is not possible nor desirable because disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20] — student groups strategically leverage points of disruption to confront authority, compel negotiations, and demand systemic change.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene
McKeithen, W. (2017) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1336302 · Cited by 3,949
States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order
Jasanoff, S. (2004) · Cited by 2,942
Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene
Haraway, D. (2016) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 2,246
Kafer, A. (2013) · doi:10.2979/6841.0 · Cited by 2,131
Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability
McRuer, R., & Bérubé, M. 1. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5344 · Cited by 1,868
Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge
(1997) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0297-242 · Cited by 1,666
Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience
Haraway, D., & Randolph, L. M. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,589
Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions
McDonald, B. C., de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Jathar, S. H., Akherati, A., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., Hayes, P. L., McKeen, S. A., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0524 · Cited by 1,373
TallBear, K. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816685776 · Cited by 1,139
Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment
Charlton, J. I. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0640 · Cited by 1,124
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ableism, technoableism, and future AI
Shew, A. (2020) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2020.2967492 · Cited by 201
Disability Expertise: Claiming Disability Anthropology
Hartblay, C. (2020) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/705781 · Cited by 137
Mills, M. C. 2. /. J., & Sanchez, R. (2023) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9781479819386.001.0001 · Cited by 115
Social Justice in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review
Chordia, I., Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., Boone, A., Sheehan, A., Dombrowski, L. S., Dantec, C. A. L., Ringland, K. E., & Smith, A. D. R. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642704 · Cited by 80
A New Era in Multimodal Learning Analytics: Twelve Core Commitments to Ground and Grow MMLA
Worsley, M. B., Martínez‐Maldonado, R., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.7361 · Cited by 69
Definition drives design: Disability models and mechanisms of bias in AI technologies
Newman-Griffis, D. R., Rauchberg, J. S., Alharbi, R., Hickman, L., & Hochheiser, H. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i1.12903 · Cited by 66
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14155.001.0001 · Cited by 61
Unsettling Languages, Unruly Bodyminds: Imaging a Crip LinguisticsPreprint
Henner, J., & Robinson, O. E. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7bzaw · Cited by 62
Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability
Becker, C. (2023) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14668.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Accessibility and The Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility's Impact on Public Space
Bennett, C. L., Ackerman, E. E., Fan, B., Bigham, J. P., Carrington, P., & Fox, S. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462065 · Cited by 51
Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes
Berridge, C., & Grigorovich, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2022.957246 · Cited by 47
“Connecting this to earlier critiques of medical and technological interventions on disabled lives (Davis, 2003; Garland-Thompson, 2006; Hamraie and Fritsch, 2019), these scholars demonstrate how AI technologies similarly rely on the assumption that we need to “overcome” disability through…”
BackgroundNothing about us without us: The urgent need for disability-inclusive climate research
Jodoin, S., Buettgen, A., Groce, N. E., Gurung, P., Kaiser, C., Kett, M. E., Keogh, M., Macanawai, S. S., Muñoz, Y., Powaseu, I., et al. (2023) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000153 · Cited by 42
Critiquing Menstrual Pain Technologies through the Lens of Feminist Disability Studies
Park, J. Y., Hsueh, S., Woytuk, N. C., Huang, X., Felice, M. C., & Balaam, M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642691 · Cited by 40
Lillywhite, A., & Wolbring, G. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9040259 · Cited by 43
Williams, R. M., & Park, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581556 · Cited by 35
Speculating Deaf Tech: Reimagining Technologies Centering Deaf People
Angelini, R., Spiel, K., & De Meulder, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713238 · Cited by 33
Squeaky wheels: Missing data, disability, and power in the smart city
Deitz, S. L., Lobben, A. K., & Alferez, A. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211047735 · Cited by 33
Martinez, J. J., Froehlich, J. E., & Fogarty, J. A. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642804 · Cited by 32
Crip Theory and Mad Studies: Intersections and Points of Departure
Thorneycroft, R. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Disability Studies · doi:10.15353/cjds.v9i1.597 · Cited by 32
Imagining a Neuroqueer Technoscience
Rauchberg, J. S. (2022) · Studies in Social Justice · doi:10.26522/ssj.v16i2.3415 · Cited by 32
#ActuallyAutistic Twitter as a Site for Epistemic Resistance and Crip Futurity
Guberman, J. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3569891 · Cited by 34
Janicki, S., Parvin, N., & Howell, N. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3661509 · Cited by 30
Personal Autonomy and (Digital) Technology: An Enactive Sensorimotor Framework
Pérez-Verdugo, M., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00683-y · Cited by 29
Introduction to Special Section on Crip Technoscience
Fritsch, K., Hamraie, A., Mills, M., & Serlin, D. H. (2019) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v5i1.31998 · Cited by 26
Self-citationWilliams, R. M. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants · doi:10.22215/cjcr.v6i1.1976 · Cited by 25
Continuing Presence of Discarded Bodies: Occupational Harm, Necro-Activism, and Living Justice
Kim, E. (2019) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29616 · Cited by 25
Cripping Data Visualizations: Crip Technoscience as a Critical Lens for Designing Digital Access
Hsueh, S., Vincenzi, B., Murdeshwar, A., & Felice, M. C. (2023) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3597638.3608427 · Cited by 25
New possibilities or problems for disability and inclusion? The case of AI and ADMs across work
Zhuang, K. V., & Goggin, G. M. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102156 · Cited by 21
A Feminist Care Ethics Toolkit for Community-Based Design: Bridging Theory and Practice
Henriques, A. O., Carter, A. R. L., Severes, B., Talhouk, R., Strohmayer, A., Pires, A. C., Gray, C. M., Montague, K., & Nicolau, H. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713950 · Cited by 31
Eagle, T., Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., & Ringland, K. E. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3689648 · Cited by 34
“It is imperative to the field of human–computer interaction (HCI) (especially those focused on accessibility) that we look to disabled, chronically ill, and ND communities as knowers and makers [40, 52, 109] and recognize them as a foundational site of knowledge.”
Ouch! Eew! Blech! A Trialogue on Porous Technologies, Places and Embodiments
Iengo, I., Kotsila, P., & Nelson, I. L. (2023) · Gender, development and social change · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20928-4_4 · Cited by 20
Critical pedagogy and disability in participatory research: a review
May, E. (2024) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-02-2023-0021 · Cited by 20
Browne, J., & McKeown, M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198892878.001.0001 · Cited by 22
Jones, C. T., Rice, C. M., Lam, M., Chandler, E., & Lee, K. J. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101537 · Cited by 20
Lillywhite, A., & Wolbring, G. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12020077 · Cited by 22
Resisting Normality with Cultural Accessibility and Slow Technology
Johnson, M. A., Chandler, E., & Rice, C. M. (2024) · Leonardo · doi:10.1162/leon_a_02502 · Cited by 19
Cripping environmental education: rethinking disability, nature, and interdependent futures
Schmidt, J. (2022) · Australian Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1017/aee.2022.26 · Cited by 19
Alper, M. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14152.001.0001 · Cited by 18
Toward an Access-Oriented Field
Lay, B. L., & Card, D. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC) · doi:10.1145/3513130.3558974 · Cited by 17
Accessibility and participatory design: time, power, and facilitation
Stephens, L., Smith, H., Epstein, I., Baljko, M., Mcintosh, I., Dadashi, N., & Prakash, D. N. (2023) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2023.2214145 · Cited by 17
Queering/Cripping Technologies of Productivity
Janicki, S., Riggs, A. T., Howell, N., Sullivan, A., & Stangl, A. J. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3644067 · Cited by 18
McNally, K., Wright, K., Goldkind, L., Kattari, S. K., & Victor, B. G. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241279549 · Cited by 20
Jaworski, S. (2022) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v8i2.36206 · Cited by 16
Ansuini, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83541-4_7 · Cited by 16
A Critical Review of Sexuality, Technology and Disability
Patel, D., Osipova, E., Spiel, K., & Barbareschi, G. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713994 · Cited by 20
Not robots; Cyborgs — Furthering anti-ableist research in human-computer interaction
Guberman, J., & Haimson, O. L. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i1.12910 · Cited by 17
Dehnert, M., & Leach, R. B. (2021) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.2.7 · Cited by 16
Das, M., Stangl, A., & Findlater, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3641018 · Cited by 15
Designing Touch Technologies for and with Bodies in Menstrual Discomfort
Park, J. Y., Zheng, C. Y., Woytuk, N. C., Huang, X., Balaam, M., & Felice, M. C. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714032 · Cited by 16
Cripping the Co-Design of Pacing Technologies For Energy-Limiting Conditions
Homewood, S., Hinkle, C. A., & Kaklopoulou, I. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713990 · Cited by 18
Higher education futures at the intersection of justice, hope, and educational technology
Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Ross, J., Alhadad, S. S. J., & Dickson-Deane, C. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00475-0 · Cited by 15
Imagining alternative futures with augmentative and alternative communication: a manifesto
Sellwood, D., McLeod, L., Williams, K., Brown, K. S., & Pullin, G. (2024) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2024-013022 · Cited by 14
Affordances and spatial agency in psychopathology
Krueger, J. W. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2243975 · Cited by 14
Virtual Reality, Disability, and Futurity Cripping Technologies in Half-Life: Alyx
Jerreat-Poole, A. (2022) · Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies · doi:10.3828/jlcds.2022.4 · Cited by 13
Beyond the Single Story of Climate Vulnerability
Bell, S., Jodoin, S., Bush, T. N., Crow, L., Eriksen, S., Geen, E., Keogh, M., & Yeo, R. (2024) · International Journal of Disability and Social Justice · doi:10.13169/intljofdissocjus.4.2.0048 · Cited by 13
McDonnell, E. J., & Findlater, L. (2024) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3663548.3675649 · Cited by 17
Terms of use: Crip legibility in information systems
Brilmyer, G. M., & Lee, C. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i1.12935 · Cited by 13
Harvey, E., Sandhaus, H., Jacobs, A. Z., Moss, E., & Sloane, M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642004 · Cited by 15
In the Moment of Glitch: Engaging with Misalignments in Ethical Practice
Garrett, R., Hawkins, K., Brundell, P., Castle-Green, S. D., Tennent, P., Zhou, F., Lampinen, A., Höök, K., & Benford, S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713632 · Cited by 12
Good for tech: Disability expertise and labor in China's artificial intelligence sector
Wu, D. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i1.12887 · Cited by 12
Episodic disability in the neoliberal university: Stories from the Canadian context
Rice, C. M., Harrison, E., Giddings, C., Chivers, S., Meerai, S., & Zitzelsberger, H. (2023) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.13009 · Cited by 12
Berkhout, S., & Zaheer, J. (2021) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v7i1.34101 · Cited by 12
Queer/Crip Body Mapping: Expressing Dynamic Bodily Experiences with Data
Riggs, A. T., Janicki, S., Moesgen, T., Howell, N., & Cochrane, K. A. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735438 · Cited by 11
Modeling Accessibility: Characterizing What We Mean by “Accessible”
Mack, K., Martinez, J. J., Lewis, A., Mankoff, J. C., Fogarty, J. A., Findlater, L., Evans, H., Bennett, C. L., & McDonnell, E. J. (2025) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3663547.3746344 · Cited by 14
Canagarajah, S. (2024) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.23017.can · Cited by 11
Shaw, C., & Nickpour, F. (2024) · Advanced Design Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijadr.2024.07.003 · Cited by 11
Understanding "Mutes" in Social Virtual Reality
Chen, Q., Bellucci, A., Cai, J., Nelimarkka, M., & Jacucci, G. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714244 · Cited by 11
Who needs to (un)know? On the generative possibilities of ignorance for autistic futures
Orsini, M. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2022.2098399 · Cited by 11
The Making of Accessibility to Rural Place for Blind People
Giraud, T., Loreto, I. D., & Tixier, M. (2020) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395527 · Cited by 11
Williams, A., Alikhademi, K., Munyaka, I. N. S., & Gilbert, J. E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3514254 · Cited by 10
Differences as potentials: A posthuman re-envisioning of disability and mobility
Gibson, B. E., Rice, C. M., Gladstone, B., Gray, J., Kelly, E., Mosleh, D., & Mistry, B. (2025) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593251329489 · Cited by 10
Body Politics: Unpacking Tensions and Future Perspectives for Body-Centric Design Research in HCI
Tsaknaki, V., Alaoui, S. F., Homewood, S., Fritsch, J., Brynskov, A., Núñez-Pacheco, C., Carlson, K., Spiel, K., Gillies, M. F. P., & Harrington, C. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3706710 · Cited by 10
(Re)discovering Sexual Pleasure after Cancer: Understanding the Design Space
Offerman, C., Bourgeois, J., van Beurden, J., & Bozzon, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713535 · Cited by 10
Making International Things:Designing World Politics Differently
Austin, J. L., & Leander, A. (2023) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksad068 · Cited by 10
Journalism and Disability in Canada: Blind and Visually Impaired Journalists Weigh In
Jones, C. T., Saujani, S., & Zbitnew, A. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2021v46n1a3897 · Cited by 10
Cripping the History of Computing
Wu, D. (2021) · IEEE Annals of the History of Computing · doi:10.1109/mahc.2021.3101061 · Cited by 10
DREEM: Moving from Empathy to Enculturation in Disability Related Human-Centered Design
Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., Duval, J., & Ringland, K. E. (2024) · The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3663548.3675642 · Cited by 9
Friction in Processual Ethics: Reconfiguring Ethical Relations in Interdisciplinary Research
Garrett, R., Brundell, P., Castle-Green, S. D., Hawkins, K., Tennent, P., Zhou, F., Lampinen, A., Höök, K., & Benford, S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714123 · Cited by 12
Minor Resistance: The Everyday Politics and Power Dynamics of Assistive Technology Adoption
Hsueh, S., Dusen, D. V., Caspi, A., & Mankoff, J. C. (2025) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3663547.3746465 · Cited by 10
Katila, S., Meriläinen, S. C., & Bell, E. (2023) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800377035.00007 · Cited by 11
Eco-ableism and access circularity in natural building
Schleck, G., & Ben-Alon, L. (2024) · Frontiers of Architectural Research · doi:10.1016/j.foar.2023.11.005 · Cited by 9
From a figment of your imagination: Disabled marginal cases and underthought experiments
Shew, A. (2020) · Human Affairs · doi:10.1515/humaff-2020-0054 · Cited by 9
Gardner, P. M., Surlin, S., Akinyemi, A., Rauchberg, J. S., McArthur, C., Hao, Y., Zheng, R., & Παπαϊωάννου, Α. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_4 · Cited by 9
Enhancement Technologies and the Politics of Life
Compagna, D., & Şahinol, M. (2022) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-022-00416-z · Cited by 9
Baillargeon, P., Yoon, J., & Zhang, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711106 · Cited by 8
Experiencing Deaf Tech: A Deep Dive into the Concept of DeafWatch
Angelini, R., Spiel, K., & Meulder, M. D. (2024) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3663548.3688483 · Cited by 10
Cowan, T. L., & Rault, J. (2024) · Punctum Books · doi:10.53288/0364.1.00 · Cited by 9
Clepper, G., McDonnell, E. J., Findlater, L., & Peek, N. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714173 · Cited by 8
Fast, V., & Deitz, S. L. (2025) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/03091325251385569 · Cited by 8
Pinto, A., Quilter, E. E. V., Vasikaran, J., Koerner, S., Chimonas, T., Nielsen, E. E., Marshall, P., & O'Hara, K. P. (2025) · Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3764687.3764713 · Cited by 8
Knowing by DEAF‐listening: Epistemologies and ontologies revealed in song‐signing
Robinson, K. F. (2022) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13746 · Cited by 8
Communicating AI and Disability
Goggin, G. M., Prahl, A., & Zhuang, K. V. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14447-9_13 · Cited by 8
Cripping sex education: reflections on a public pedagogy project
Jones, C. T., & Murphy, E. L. (2024) · Sex Education · doi:10.1080/14681811.2024.2362389 · Cited by 8
Interrogating access: a critical disability studies approach to information practices research
May, E. (2024) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-05-2024-0117 · Cited by 8
Sociological Perspectives on Disability
Mauldin, L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.3 · Cited by 8
Dreaming of disability‐as‐possibility as a humanistic STEM education futurity
Boda, P. A. (2024) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21891 · Cited by 8
Governing generative AI for disability and inclusion
Zhuang, K. V., & Goggin, G. M. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2570735 · Cited by 7
Expanding Norms, Negotiating Bodies: How Artists with Disabilities Perceive and Use Creative Tools
Brody, M., Rodrigues, I., E, J. L., & Li, J. (2025) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3663547.3746331 · Cited by 7
Toward a Cripistemology of Eco-Anxiety
Hall, K. Q. (2024) · Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies · doi:10.3828/jlcds.2024.4 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 2380-3312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944785538
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- disability justice, people with disabilities, critical design, intersectionality, social justice, disability studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
