Cited by 2,100Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesMathematics Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress

Open access

Abstract

In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0002831209345157

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 124

  1. 10.3102/0013189X07308739 · DOI
  2. American Council on Education, 1999, To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught
  3. 10.3102/0162373707313409 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/461626 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ball DL, 1991, Advances in research on teaching: Vol 2 Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, 1
  6. Ball DL, 2003, Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 3
  7. Ball DL, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 433
  8. 10.1111/0161-4681.00046 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · DOI
  10. Berliner CD, 1994, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, 161
  11. Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, 171
  12. Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung [Professional competence of student teachers—Knowledge, beliefs, and learning opportunities of mathematics teacher candidates: Initial findings on the effectiveness of teacher training]
  13. Bollen KA, 1993, Testing structural equation models
  14. 10.2307/749118 · DOI
  15. 10.3102/00028312026004473 · DOI
  16. Bransford J, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 1
  17. Bransford JD, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 40
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Brophy J, 2000, Teaching
  20. Carstensen CH, 2004, PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs, 371
  21. Cochran-Smith M, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
  22. 10.3102/0002831208323280 · DOI
  23. 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · DOI
  24. 10.17763/haer.76.4.d8277u8778245404 · DOI
  25. De Corte E, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 491
  26. 10.1080/00220270701305362 · DOI
  27. Ditton H, 2007, Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen [Competence building and careers in the education system: Results of a longitudinal study in elementary schools]
  28. 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/749384 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/749215 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/749875 · DOI
  32. Fennema E, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
  33. Floden RE, 2005, Studying teacher education, 261
  34. 10.3102/00028312032004687 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9 · DOI
  36. Goe L, 2007, The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis
  37. 10.3102/01623737022002129 · DOI
  38. Goodson IF, 1998, Subject knowledge: Readings for the study of school subjects
  39. Goodson IF, 1996, Studying school subjects
  40. Greeno JG, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 15
  41. Grossman PL, 1995, International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 20
  42. 10.1177/0022487107310748 · DOI
  43. Grossman PL, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
  44. Harbison RW, 1992, Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil
  45. Heaton RM, 2000, Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance
  46. Heller K, 2000, Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12 + R) [Cognitive Abilities Test for Grades 4 to 12, revision]
  47. Helmke A, 2009, Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: Diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]
  48. 10.1177/0022487106295726 · DOI
  49. 10.3102/01623737027002111 · DOI
  50. 10.3102/0162373707301711 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/15366360701487138 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/0895904807307061 · DOI
  53. Jordan A, 2006, Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematical tasks: Documentation of the task categorization in the COACTIV study]
  54. 10.1023/A:1025175812582 · DOI
  55. Krauss S, 2008, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 873
  56. 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
  58. Kunter M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 161
  59. Kunter M, 2009, Lehrprofessionalität—Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, 153
  60. Kunter M, 2007, Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme, 32
  61. Lanahan L, 2005, Fundamental problems in the measurement of instructional processes: Estimating reasonable effect sizes and conceptualizing what is important to measure
  62. Leinhardt G, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 333
  63. 10.1177/0022487108315581 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · DOI
  65. 10.4324/9781410602589 · DOI
  66. 10.3102/00028312038002321 · DOI
  67. 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Mewborn D, 2003, A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 45
  69. Mitchell R, 1999, Thinking K–16, 3, 1
  70. 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5 · DOI
  71. 10.1086/447369 · DOI
  72. Munby H, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 877
  73. Muthén LK, 2004, Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide
  74. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
  75. National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
  76. 10.3102/00028312037001123 · DOI
  77. 10.3102/01623737026003237 · DOI
  78. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004, Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003
  79. 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
  80. 10.3102/00346543063002167 · DOI
  81. Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [PISA 2003: Studies on competence development over a school year]
  82. Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 29
  83. 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1086/461723 · DOI
  85. Reynolds MC, 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
  86. 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.2307/2673267 · DOI
  88. Scheerens J, 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
  89. 10.1080/15366360701487021 · DOI
  90. 10.1080/15366360701486965 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Schmidt WH, 2007, The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. Mathematics teaching in the 21st century (MT21)
  92. 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7 · DOI
  93. 10.1080/15366360701492880 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00035-8 · DOI
  95. 10.3102/0034654307310317 · DOI
  96. Sfard A, 2003, A research companion for NCTM standards, 353
  97. Shavelson RJ, 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer, 1
  98. Sherin MG, 1996, The nature and dynamics of teachers’ content knowledge
  99. Shuell T, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 726
  100. Shulman LS, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 399
  101. 10.2307/749346 · DOI
  102. 10.1080/03057640701372426 · DOI
  103. 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 · DOI
  104. 10.3102/00028312027004639 · DOI
  105. 10.1080/002202797183928 · DOI
  106. Stigler J, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
  107. 10.3102/00028312032002227 · DOI
  108. 10.2307/749683 · DOI
  109. 10.2307/749194 · DOI
  110. 10.2307/749339 · DOI
  111. Tymms P, 2004, But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research, 55
  112. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation, 2003, Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality
  113. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 2006, The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom
  114. Vosniadou S, 2005, Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, 55
  115. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.014 · DOI
  116. Walberg HJ, 2000, Effective educational practices
  117. 10.3102/0034654308320292 · DOI
  118. 10.3102/00346543063003249 · DOI
  119. 10.3102/00346543073001089 · DOI · Paper page
  120. Wilson SM, 2003, Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions
  121. Winship C, 2007, Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research
  122. Wu ML, 1997, ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software manual
  123. Zeichner KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 645
  124. Zumwalt KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 157

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,003

Metadata

Authors
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2010-03
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
133-180
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W2141462352
Cited by
2,100
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
FWCI
165.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review