The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress
Open accessAbstract
In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Baumert et al. (2010:139) argue that MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and “reflection on classroom experience”.”
From Mentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers (2020) · cites this paper as Baumert et al. (2010:139)
In the citing paper
“Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic (Baumert et al., 2010)”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Baumert et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812
Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory
Warm, T. A. (1989) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294627 · Cited by 1,216
Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312906 · Cited by 1,164 · cited 1×
“…affect students’ learning gains and motivational development (Bransford, Darling-Hammond, & LePage, 2005; Bransford, Derry, Berliner, & Hammerness, 2005; Grossman & McDonald, 2008; Grossman & Schoenfeld, 2005; Hiebert, Morris, Berk, & Jansen, 2007; Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001; Reynolds, 1989).”
Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/428763 · Cited by 902 · cited 13×
“In contrast to Hill and colleagues (Hill et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2007), who conceptualized mathematical knowledge for teaching as an amalgam of the mathematical everyday knowledge that all educated adults should have, a purely mathematical understanding of topics typically taught at school, and mathematical knowled…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCreating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 124
- 10.3102/0013189X07308739 · DOI
- American Council on Education, 1999, To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught
- 10.3102/0162373707313409 · DOI
- 10.1086/461626 · DOI · Paper page
- Ball DL, 1991, Advances in research on teaching: Vol 2 Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, 1
- Ball DL, 2003, Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 3
- Ball DL, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 433
- 10.1111/0161-4681.00046 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · DOI
- Berliner CD, 1994, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, 161
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, 171
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung [Professional competence of student teachers—Knowledge, beliefs, and learning opportunities of mathematics teacher candidates: Initial findings on the effectiveness of teacher training]
- Bollen KA, 1993, Testing structural equation models
- 10.2307/749118 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312026004473 · DOI
- Bransford J, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 1
- Bransford JD, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 40
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Brophy J, 2000, Teaching
- Carstensen CH, 2004, PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs, 371
- Cochran-Smith M, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
- 10.3102/0002831208323280 · DOI
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.76.4.d8277u8778245404 · DOI
- De Corte E, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 491
- 10.1080/00220270701305362 · DOI
- Ditton H, 2007, Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen [Competence building and careers in the education system: Results of a longitudinal study in elementary schools]
- 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193 · DOI
- 10.2307/749384 · DOI
- 10.2307/749215 · DOI
- 10.2307/749875 · DOI
- Fennema E, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
- Floden RE, 2005, Studying teacher education, 261
- 10.3102/00028312032004687 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9 · DOI
- Goe L, 2007, The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis
- 10.3102/01623737022002129 · DOI
- Goodson IF, 1998, Subject knowledge: Readings for the study of school subjects
- Goodson IF, 1996, Studying school subjects
- Greeno JG, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 15
- Grossman PL, 1995, International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 20
- 10.1177/0022487107310748 · DOI
- Grossman PL, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
- Harbison RW, 1992, Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil
- Heaton RM, 2000, Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance
- Heller K, 2000, Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12 + R) [Cognitive Abilities Test for Grades 4 to 12, revision]
- Helmke A, 2009, Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: Diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]
- 10.1177/0022487106295726 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737027002111 · DOI
- 10.3102/0162373707301711 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701487138 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904807307061 · DOI
- Jordan A, 2006, Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematical tasks: Documentation of the task categorization in the COACTIV study]
- 10.1023/A:1025175812582 · DOI
- Krauss S, 2008, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 873
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
- Kunter M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 161
- Kunter M, 2009, Lehrprofessionalität—Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, 153
- Kunter M, 2007, Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme, 32
- Lanahan L, 2005, Fundamental problems in the measurement of instructional processes: Estimating reasonable effect sizes and conceptualizing what is important to measure
- Leinhardt G, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 333
- 10.1177/0022487108315581 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410602589 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312038002321 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
- Mewborn D, 2003, A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 45
- Mitchell R, 1999, Thinking K–16, 3, 1
- 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/447369 · DOI
- Munby H, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 877
- Muthén LK, 2004, Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- 10.3102/00028312037001123 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737026003237 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004, Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003
- 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063002167 · DOI
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [PISA 2003: Studies on competence development over a school year]
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 29
- 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/461723 · DOI
- Reynolds MC, 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
- 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2673267 · DOI
- Scheerens J, 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
- 10.1080/15366360701487021 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701486965 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt WH, 2007, The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. Mathematics teaching in the 21st century (MT21)
- 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701492880 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00035-8 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654307310317 · DOI
- Sfard A, 2003, A research companion for NCTM standards, 353
- Shavelson RJ, 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer, 1
- Sherin MG, 1996, The nature and dynamics of teachers’ content knowledge
- Shuell T, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 726
- Shulman LS, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 399
- 10.2307/749346 · DOI
- 10.1080/03057640701372426 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312027004639 · DOI
- 10.1080/002202797183928 · DOI
- Stigler J, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
- 10.3102/00028312032002227 · DOI
- 10.2307/749683 · DOI
- 10.2307/749194 · DOI
- 10.2307/749339 · DOI
- Tymms P, 2004, But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research, 55
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation, 2003, Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 2006, The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom
- Vosniadou S, 2005, Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, 55
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.014 · DOI
- Walberg HJ, 2000, Effective educational practices
- 10.3102/0034654308320292 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063003249 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543073001089 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson SM, 2003, Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions
- Winship C, 2007, Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research
- Wu ML, 1997, ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software manual
- Zeichner KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 645
- Zumwalt KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,003
Out-of-Field Teaching Affecting Students and Learning: What Is Known and Unknown
Porsch, R., & Whannell, R. (2019) · Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_7 · Cited by 23
Diagnostic Skills of Mathematics Teachers in the COACTIV Study
Binder, K., Krauß, S., Hilbert, S., Brunner, M., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_2 · Cited by 22
Self-citationA Standardized Approach for measuring Teachers´ Professional Vision: The Observer Research Tool
Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_21 · Cited by 23
Wang, Y., Qin, K., Luo, C., Yang, T., & Xin, T. (2022) · ZDM – Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s11858-022-01353-7 · Cited by 22
“, 2021), mediated through instruction including cognitive activation and individual learning support (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultYoon, I., & Goddard, R. D. (2023) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2023.2264309 · Cited by 31
“Baumert et al .”
Chan, M., & Liem, G. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12620 · Cited by 22
Arthur, Y., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Asiedu-Addo, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-06-2021-0243 · Cited by 22
Tan, C. Y., & Dimmock, C. (2020) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1780416 · Cited by 26
“Cognitive activation refers to teachers providing students with opportunities to solve challenging problems and helping students to develop and apply strategies to solve authentic problems (Baumert et al. 2010; Klieme, Pauli, and Reusser 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialAtit, K., Miller, D. I., Newcombe, N. S., & Uttal, D. H. (2018) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000041 · Cited by 22
“Teachers play an important role in shaping students’ educational outcomes and experiences (e.g., Ball, Hill, & Bass, 2005; Baumert et al., 2010; Baylor & Ritchie, 2002).”
BackgroundKuger, S., Klieme, E., Lüdtke, O., Schiepe-Tiska, A., & Reiss, K. M. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-017-0750-6 · Cited by 36
“Professionswissen von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Mathematikunterricht und die Entwicklung von mathematischer Kompetenz (COACTIV): Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente (Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 83).”
BackgroundInfluentialSon, J.-W. (2016) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.02.003 · Cited by 22
Formal Teacher Competence and its Effect on Pupil Reading Achievement
Johansson, S., Myrberg, E., & Rosén, M. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2014.965787 · Cited by 20
“In line with the previous research conducted by Myrberg (2007) and Baumert et al. (2010), these studies point to the importance of both content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge.”
BackgroundMethodResultIs ATAR useful for predicting the success of Australian Students in initial teacher education
Wright, V. (2015) · doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.1 · Cited by 22
“particularly assessment of pedagogical-content knowledge, scores are positively associated with student achievement (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Ball, & Schilling, 2008).”
Overall Commentary: Understanding and Changing Mathematics Teachers
Chapman, O. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02562-9_16 · Cited by 22
Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education
Jablonka, E., & Niss, M. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8 · Cited by 22
Backfisch, I., Franke, U., Ohla, K., Scholtz, N., & Lachner, A. (2023) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-023-00192-z · Cited by 26
Tetzner, J., Becker, M., & Bihler, L.-M. (2022) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070221121178 · Cited by 29
“…possible and necessary for students to actively modify their own learning processes by rewarding intellectual autonomy and creativity (Noftle & Robins, 2007) and encouraging students to fi nd and discuss different solutions to and opinions on a problem or idea (Baumert et al., 2010; Gamoran, 1993).”
BackgroundSmith, L., Nixon, R. S., Sudweeks, R., & Larsen, R. (2022) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103661 · Cited by 21
Teaching as a Knowledge Profession
(2021) · Educational Research and Innovation · doi:10.1787/e823ef6e-en · Cited by 21
Richter, E., Kunter, M., Marx, A., & Richter, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.722169 · Cited by 33
Self-citationAssessing teacher pedagogical knowledge: the Video Assessment of Teacher Knowledge (VATK)
Wiens, P. D., Beck, J. S., & Lunsmann, C. J. (2020) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1750350 · Cited by 21
“These question-and-answer assessments are the focus of much teacher knowledge assessment research (Baumert et al. 2010).”
BackgroundFörtsch, C., Dorfner, T., Baumgartner, J., Werner, S., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9709-8 · Cited by 21
Lesseig, K., Hine, G., Na, G., & Boardman, K. (2019) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/s13394-019-00260-7 · Cited by 21
Schwartz, K., Cappella, E., & Aber, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2018.1502385 · Cited by 25
INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF TEACHERS’ PHYSICS CK ON STUDENTS OUTCOMES
Ohle, A., Boone, W., & Fischer, H. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9547-8 · Cited by 21
Rieser, S., Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology · doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.2.138 · Cited by 17
“The three dimensions of teaching quality were operationalized according to previous research by Baumert et al. (2010) and Klieme et al. (2009).”
MethodHoover, M. N., & Zoest, L. R. V. (2013) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0491-9 · Cited by 14
Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs at Commercial Schools—An Empirical Study in Germany
Seifried, J. (2012) · doi:10.1080/09639284.2012.661606 · Cited by 21
“…(who want to hire effective teachers) because empirical findings show a relationship between pedagogical beliefs and teaching quality (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; Peterson et al., 1989; Staub and Stern, 2002), while other studies do not confirm these results (e.g., Fang, 1996; Kane,…”
BackgroundResultThe Relationship between Agriculture Knowledge Bases for Teaching and Sources of Knowledge.
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2015) · doi:10.5032/jae.2015.04153 · Cited by 21
“This is consistent with literature supporting the effects of these sources (Darling-Hammond, 2000; Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultFukaya, T., Nakamura, D., Kitayama, Y., & Nakagoshi, T. (2024) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104881 · Cited by 33
She, J., Chan, K. K. H., Wang, J., Hu, X., & Liu, E. (2024) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312241278627 · Cited by 30
“Unlike in the field of mathematics education (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2005), the findings in science education regarding the relationship are She et al. at best mixed and underdetermined.”
Types of mathematical tasks in lower secondary classrooms in Germany
Adleff, A.-K., Ross, N., König, J., & Kaiser, G. (2023) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-023-10254-9 · Cited by 25
“…, computational modelling , and conceptual modelling ), level of mathematical argumentation required , and translation processes within mathematics —were deemed most suitable to describe tasks’ potential for cognitive activation with regard to the quality of instruction (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialValidation of an Instrument for Assessing Elementary-Grade Educators’ Knowledge to Teach Reading
Hall, C., Solari, E., Hayes, L., Dahl-Leonard, K., Decoster, J., Kehoe, K. F., Conner, C. L., Henry, A., Demchak, A., Richmond, C. L., et al. (2023) · Reading & Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-023-10456-w · Cited by 20
“…subject matter to be taught) and pedagogical content knowledge (knowledge required to teach this subject matter effectively to students; Shulman, 1987); research has demonstrated positive relations of each type of knowledge with student learning (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Podhajski et al., 2009).”
Constructing a Digital Competence Evaluation Framework for In-Service Teachers’ Online Teaching
Tang, L., Gu, J.-J., & Xu, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14095268 · Cited by 20
Alemu, M., Kind, V., Basheh, M., Michael, K., Atnafu, M., Kind, P., & Rajab, T. (2019) · Compare · doi:10.1080/03057925.2019.1593107 · Cited by 20
Tröbst, S., Kleickmann, T., Depaepe, F., Heinze, A., & Kunter, M. (2019) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-019-00041-y · Cited by 20
Self-citationCharacterising lesson planning: a case study with mathematics teachers
González, M., Gómez, P., & Pinzón, A. (2018) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210.2018.1539071 · Cited by 20
Learning Opportunities in Biology Teacher Education Contribute to Understanding of Nature of Science
Bruckermann, T., Ochsen, F., & Mahler, D. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci8030103 · Cited by 21
“, cognitive activation; [39]) could serve as variables to further explain the relevance of NOS-related learning opportunities for the understanding of NOS.”
BackgroundFörtsch, C., Werner, S., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1394286 · Cited by 17
“The German project Professional Knowledge of Teachers, Cognitively Activating Instruction and the Development of Students’ Mathematical Competence (COACTIV) analysed the quality of tasks in mathematics instruction (Baumert et al. 2010; Jordan et al. 2008).”
BackgroundRosenkränzer, F., Kramer, T., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Riess, W. (2016) · doi:10.5539/hes.v6n4p156 · Cited by 20
“Thus it is not surprising that several studies provide evidence for a positive relationship between the teacher’s CK and the respective students’ learning progress (Abell, 2007; Baumert et al., 2009; Hashweh, 2005).”
BackgroundResultEvidence on the Validity of Content Knowledge for Teaching Assessments
Gitomer, D., Phelps, G., Weren, B., Howell, H., & Croft, A. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781119210856.ch15 · Cited by 20
Charalambous, C. Y., Komitis, A., Papacharalambous, M., & Stefanou, A. (2014) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.001 · Cited by 23
Sequencing computer-assisted learning of transformations of trigonometric functions
Ross, J. A., Bruce, C. D., & Sibbald, T. (2011) · Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/teamat/hrr009 · Cited by 14
Ríordáin, M. N., Paolucci, C., & Lyons, T. (2019) · Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_5 · Cited by 20
Evens, M. (2016) · Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras · doi:10.30827/digibug.53944 · Cited by 26
“, 2013), Shulman’s claim was empirically confirmed by several studies in the domain of mathematics, showing that teachers’ PCK positively impacts instructional quality and student learning (Baumert et al., 2010; Kunter et al., 2013). Hence, investing in (pre-service) teachers’ PCK might improve the quality of educatio…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEntwicklung eines Testverfahrens zur Analyse fachdidaktischen Wissens
Tepner, O., & Dollny, S. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37827-0_25 · Cited by 20
Aslam, R., Khan, N., & Ahmed, U. (2020) · Journal of Education and Educational Development · doi:10.22555/joeed.v7i2.31 · Cited by 20
Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Alzouebi, K. (2025) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/17411432241305702 · Cited by 28
“Teachers employ cognitive activation strategies to foster students ’ complex thinking abilities, such as critical analysis, problem-solving, and creativity, by actively involving them in the learning trajectory (Baumert et al., 2010).”
InfluentialLi, J.-X., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024) · Journal of Education and Teaching · doi:10.1080/02607476.2024.2358041 · Cited by 19
“…PCK as one type of content-specific knowledge that is particularly vital for high-quality mathematics instruction and students’ mathematics learning (Baumert et al. 2010; Kersting, Sotelo, and Stigler 2010), compared with other general pedagogical knowledge, such as classroom management skills…”
InfluentialYang, G., Shen, Q., & Jiang, R. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103178 · Cited by 24
Mikeska, J. N., Howell, H., & Kinsey, D. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103979 · Cited by 19
Smedsrud, J., Nordahl-Hansen, A., & Idsøe, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876350 · Cited by 19
“Teachers’ mathematical content knowledge MCK and pedagogical content knowledge MPCK are portrayed as having an important relationship with student gains in mathematical knowledge across levels of performance (Baumert et al., 2010), indicating that focusing on mathematical knowledge would be advantageous for all studen…”
BackgroundInfluentialDicke, A., Rubach, C., Safavian, N. S., Karabenick, S. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2021) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101521 · Cited by 26
Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., Heinrichs, H., Kaiser, G., König, J. A., & Blömeke, S. (2020) · Journal of mathematics · doi:10.1007/s13138-020-00168-x · Cited by 19
“Ausgehend von der Erkenntnis, dass schulisches Lernen in einer Domäne stattfindet (Baumert et al. 2010; Weinert 1994), dürfte die Erfassung fachspezifischer Unterrichtsqualität über die Basisdimensio- K nen hinausgehend für den Lernerfolg von Schülerinnen und Schülern bedeutsam sein.”
BackgroundInfluentialArıcan, M., & Kuzu, O. (2020) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-019-09985-0 · Cited by 19
Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00004 · Cited by 19
“For math competence, a number of studies controlling for school track differences or focusing only on the Gymnasium documented the importance of students’ shared perception of efficient classroommanagement as well as high levels of cognitive activation (e.g., Klieme et al., 2001; Klieme and Rakoczy, 2003; Lipowsky et…”
BackgroundResultUbah, I., & Bansilal, S. (2018) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v8i2.539 · Cited by 19
“Given that teacher education is a crucial period for obtaining a profound deep and conceptual understanding of fractions (Borko et al. 1992; Ma 1999; Newton 2008; Toluk-Ucar 2009; Zhou, Peverly & Xin 2006), for effective teaching to take place, there is a need to focus on the content knowledge…”
BackgroundTeacher spatial skills are linked to differences in geometry instruction
Otumfuor, B. A., & Carr, M. (2017) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12172 · Cited by 23
“Finally, a number of studies indicate that teacher pedagogic and content knowledge are linked to better instruction (Hill et al., 2008) and student mathematics achievement (Baumert et al., 2010; Kunter et al., 2013).”
BackgroundHeitmann, P., Hecht, M., Scherer, R., & Schwanewedel, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00946 · Cited by 19
“…oriented toward developing scientific understanding and competence in order to prepare students for university, nonacademic track education is aimed at providing students with a general, rather practical education that prepares them for the working world (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Blömeke, 2016).”
BackgroundJacobson, E., & Izsák, A. (2015) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-015-9320-0 · Cited by 19
Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-014-0011-7 · Cited by 19
“…both CK and PCK are considered critical professional development resources for teachers, each requiring special attention during teacher training and classroom teaching practice (Baumert et al. 2010), teachers’ professional knowledge is still difficult to define and articulate (Berry et al. 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDevelopment and evaluation of a summative assessment program for senior teacher competence
Bakx, A. W. E. A., Baartman, L. K. J., & van Schilt-Mol, T. (2013) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.004 · Cited by 20
Competence, Teacher Competence and Professional Error Competence: An Introduction
Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (2017) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52649-2_1 · Cited by 19
Critical examination of the measurement quality of student outcomes: a systematic review
Grützmacher, L., Herbert, B., Holzberger, D., Naumann, A., Steffensky, M., & Vieluf, S. (2025) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2025.2482579 · Cited by 17
Pholphirul, P., Rukumnuaykit, P., & Teimtad, S. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2243126 · Cited by 18
Helm, C., & Huber, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.743770 · Cited by 18
Quotation accuracy in educational research articles
Lazonder, A. W., & Janssen, N. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100430 · Cited by 20
Ribeiro, M., Almeida, A., & Mellone, M. (2021) · Perspectivas da educação matemática · doi:10.46312/pem.v14i35.13263 · Cited by 18
“…posteriores escolhas das estratégias a seguir, recursos a utilizar e feedback a fornecer – a escolha dessas estratégias, recursos e feedback (sua adequação e forma) sustenta-se na especificidade do conhecimento matemático do professor, que molda o seu conhecimento didático (BAUMERT et al., 2010).”
BackgroundWu, X., Xu, T., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01836-y · Cited by 21
“…researchers (Ball, Lubienski, & Mewborn, 2001; Hill, Schilling, & Ball, 2004) have conducted studies to understand teachers ’ knowledge for teaching mathematics, only a few recent studies (Baumert et al., 2010) have attempted to measure teachers ’ knowledge of data analysis (Bradshaw et al., 2014).”
BackgroundHe, P., Zheng, C.-L., & Li, T. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c9rp00286c · Cited by 18
Vollmer, H. (2021) · doi:10.1080/00220272.2021.1887363 · Cited by 18
“Contrary to some empirical approaches in measuring subject-didactic knowledge in Germany, done largely by educational scientists12 (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; Krauss et al., 2017; Kunter et al., 2013), we postulate a much wider understanding of subject-didactic knowledge (SDK) based on the outline…”
BackgroundFischer, J., Jansen, T., Møller, J., & Harms, U. (2021) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-021-00144-0 · Cited by 25
“Research has shown that CK alone is not sufficient to ensure adaptive learning and the learning success of students (e.g., Abell 2007; Baumert et al. 2010; Förtsch et al. 2018).”
BackgroundStatistical Methods in Transdisciplinary Educational Research
Lindl, A., Krauß, S., Schilcher, A., & Hilbert, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.00097 · Cited by 24
Self-citationKunina‐Habenicht, O., Maurer, C., Wolf, K., Holzberger, D., Schmidt, M., Dicke, T., Teuber, Z., Koć‐Januchta, M., Lohse-Bossenz, H., Leutner, D., et al. (2020) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000238 · Cited by 21
Self-citationDanışman, Ş., Güler, M., & Karadağ, E. (2020) · Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje · doi:10.15516/cje.v21i4.3322 · Cited by 14
“…a teacher’s professional knowledge is related to student achievement (Metzler & Woessmann, 2012; Selling, Gargia, & Ball, 2016), a claim that has been supported by the findings of Baumert et al. (2010), who showed a substantial positive impact of pedagogical content knowledge on student learning.”
BackgroundResultConstruction and Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure Content Knowledge in Biology: The CK-IBI
Großschedl, J., Mahler, D., & Harms, U. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci8030145 · Cited by 18
“, [30,31]), and corroborative research shows that teacher education programs with a content focus improve the PCK of pre-service teachers who have had few formal opportunities to develop PCK [28,32].”
Olasehinde-williams, F., Yahaya, L., & Owolabi, H. (2018) · IAFOR Journal of Education · doi:10.22492/ije.6.1.05 · Cited by 18
El conocimiento didáctico del contenido en ciencias: estado de la cuestión
Perona, J. J. V., Portolés, J. J. S., & Sanjosé-López, V. (2017) · Cadernos de Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/198053143915 · Cited by 27
Besser, M., Leiss, D., & Klieme, E. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000128 · Cited by 18
“One of the next great challenges for teacher research will be to determine how this knowledge can best be conveyed to both preservice and inservice teachers” (Baumert et al., 2010, S. 168).”
BackgroundMathematical thinking: challenging prospective teachers to do more than ‘talk the talk’
Prendergast, M., Johnson, P., Fitzmaurice, O., Liston, M., O’Keeffe, L., & O'Meara, N. (2014) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2013.868538 · Cited by 18
“[12] Many studies have found that teachers’ MKT is essential to the improvement of teaching and learning mathematics [13,14] and has been linked with improvements in students’ achievement.[12,15] However, despite such obvious importance, research studies have shown evidence of inadequate knowledge of mathematics for t…”
BackgroundRosli, R., Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. (2013) · Mathematics Education Research and Practice · doi:10.7468/jksmed.2013.17.4.221 · Cited by 18
“In addition, teachers’ lack of content and pedagogical knowledge of fractions has also been pointed out as a critical reason for failure to provide students opportunities for diverse learning experiences with fractions (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Rowan & Ball, 2005).”
BackgroundStichwort: Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht
Labudde, P., & Möller, K. (2012) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0257-0 · Cited by 30
Cole, Y. (2012) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0380-7 · Cited by 19
Stefanou, L., Tsangaridou, N., Charalambous, C., & Kyriakides, L. (2020) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2020-0010 · Cited by 18
The Impact of PISA on Mathematics Teaching and Learning in Germany
Prenzel, M., Blum, W., & Klieme, E. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_12 · Cited by 18
Self-citationEvens, M., Larmuseau, C., Dewaele, K., Van Craesbeek, L., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2017) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2017.1314779 · Cited by 18
“The CK instrument consists of 59 items on French grammar and vocabulary that are based on the CK definitions of Shulman (1987), Baumert et al. (2010), and Krauss et al. (2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWang, Y.-H. (2023) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/13499 · Cited by 17
“This finding builds on previous research that suggests cognitive activation provides students with increased support from their teachers (Förtsch et al., 2017; Hanze & Berger, 2007; Krapp, 2002) and fosters greater interest in learning (Baumert et al., 2010; Fauth et al., 2019; Klieme et al., 2009).”
ResultVoss, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.976791 · Cited by 22
Self-citationMahler, D., Bock, D., & Bruckermann, T. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11090558 · Cited by 18
Identifying teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge: A video stimulated recall study
Malva, L., Leijen, Ä., & Arcidiacono, F. (2021) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2021.1873738 · Cited by 30
“Researchers have provided evidence of PCK being an important factor in relation to pupils’ achievement and also teachers’ quality of instruction (see e.g. Baumert et al. 2010; Voss, Kunter, and Baumert 2011).”
BackgroundBegrich, L., Fauth, B., & Kunter, M. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09554-2 · Cited by 21
Self-citationLee, J., & Santagata, R. (2020) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-019-01123-y · Cited by 30
Doyle, A., Seery, N., & Gumaelius, L. (2019) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3524 · Cited by 17
“For example, such instruments exist in the mathematics research community regarding the quantification of teachers’ content knowledge within specific topics (Hill et al ., 2005; Baumert et al ., 2010).”
BackgroundKazemi, F., & Rafiepour, A. (2018) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9792-0 · Cited by 17
Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural Education · doi:10.5032/jae.2016.04086 · Cited by 17
“Transforming content knowledge for student understanding requires teachers to use their PCK (Halim & Meerah, 2002), indicating PCK is the greatest single contributor to explaining student progress (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodRozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2015) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.06.001 · Cited by 17
Lessons Learned about Effective Professional Development: Two Contrasting Case Studies
Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2015) · doi:10.18404/ijemst.43557 · Cited by 17
“Ensuring support for teachers struggling with the mathematical ideas is important since teacher knowledge is closely linked to student achievement in mathematics (Baumert et al., 2010).”
Background‘I Finally Get It!’: developing mathematical understanding during teacher education
Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2011) · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2011.622804 · Cited by 17
“Recent large-scale classroom-based research has linked specialized mathematical knowledge by teachers to student achievement 19 , and the mathematical quality of classroom lessons has also been studied by the Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project and connected to teacher capacity 20 .”
BackgroundThe COACTIV Research Program on Teachers’ Professional Competence: Summary and Discussion
Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_18 · Cited by 24
Self-citationExploring the proficiency of basic mathematical facts among primary mathematics teachers
Nanda, A., & Rani, R. (2025) · Asian Journal for Mathematics Education · doi:10.1177/27527263241307975 · Cited by 16
“By incorporating these strategies, teachers can create a more dynamic and interactive learning environment that stimulates students ’ interest and curiosity in mathematics (Baumert et al., 2009).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-180
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2141462352
- Cited by
- 2,100
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 165.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review