The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress
Open accessAbstract
In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Baumert et al. (2010:139) argue that MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and “reflection on classroom experience”.”
From Mentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers (2020) · cites this paper as Baumert et al. (2010:139)
In the citing paper
“Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic (Baumert et al., 2010)”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Baumert et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812
Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory
Warm, T. A. (1989) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294627 · Cited by 1,216
Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312906 · Cited by 1,164 · cited 1×
“…affect students’ learning gains and motivational development (Bransford, Darling-Hammond, & LePage, 2005; Bransford, Derry, Berliner, & Hammerness, 2005; Grossman & McDonald, 2008; Grossman & Schoenfeld, 2005; Hiebert, Morris, Berk, & Jansen, 2007; Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001; Reynolds, 1989).”
Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/428763 · Cited by 902 · cited 13×
“In contrast to Hill and colleagues (Hill et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2007), who conceptualized mathematical knowledge for teaching as an amalgam of the mathematical everyday knowledge that all educated adults should have, a purely mathematical understanding of topics typically taught at school, and mathematical knowled…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCreating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 124
- 10.3102/0013189X07308739 · DOI
- American Council on Education, 1999, To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught
- 10.3102/0162373707313409 · DOI
- 10.1086/461626 · DOI · Paper page
- Ball DL, 1991, Advances in research on teaching: Vol 2 Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, 1
- Ball DL, 2003, Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 3
- Ball DL, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 433
- 10.1111/0161-4681.00046 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · DOI
- Berliner CD, 1994, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, 161
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, 171
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung [Professional competence of student teachers—Knowledge, beliefs, and learning opportunities of mathematics teacher candidates: Initial findings on the effectiveness of teacher training]
- Bollen KA, 1993, Testing structural equation models
- 10.2307/749118 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312026004473 · DOI
- Bransford J, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 1
- Bransford JD, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 40
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Brophy J, 2000, Teaching
- Carstensen CH, 2004, PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs, 371
- Cochran-Smith M, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
- 10.3102/0002831208323280 · DOI
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.76.4.d8277u8778245404 · DOI
- De Corte E, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 491
- 10.1080/00220270701305362 · DOI
- Ditton H, 2007, Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen [Competence building and careers in the education system: Results of a longitudinal study in elementary schools]
- 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193 · DOI
- 10.2307/749384 · DOI
- 10.2307/749215 · DOI
- 10.2307/749875 · DOI
- Fennema E, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
- Floden RE, 2005, Studying teacher education, 261
- 10.3102/00028312032004687 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9 · DOI
- Goe L, 2007, The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis
- 10.3102/01623737022002129 · DOI
- Goodson IF, 1998, Subject knowledge: Readings for the study of school subjects
- Goodson IF, 1996, Studying school subjects
- Greeno JG, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 15
- Grossman PL, 1995, International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 20
- 10.1177/0022487107310748 · DOI
- Grossman PL, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
- Harbison RW, 1992, Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil
- Heaton RM, 2000, Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance
- Heller K, 2000, Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12 + R) [Cognitive Abilities Test for Grades 4 to 12, revision]
- Helmke A, 2009, Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: Diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]
- 10.1177/0022487106295726 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737027002111 · DOI
- 10.3102/0162373707301711 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701487138 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904807307061 · DOI
- Jordan A, 2006, Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematical tasks: Documentation of the task categorization in the COACTIV study]
- 10.1023/A:1025175812582 · DOI
- Krauss S, 2008, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 873
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
- Kunter M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 161
- Kunter M, 2009, Lehrprofessionalität—Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, 153
- Kunter M, 2007, Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme, 32
- Lanahan L, 2005, Fundamental problems in the measurement of instructional processes: Estimating reasonable effect sizes and conceptualizing what is important to measure
- Leinhardt G, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 333
- 10.1177/0022487108315581 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410602589 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312038002321 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
- Mewborn D, 2003, A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 45
- Mitchell R, 1999, Thinking K–16, 3, 1
- 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/447369 · DOI
- Munby H, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 877
- Muthén LK, 2004, Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- 10.3102/00028312037001123 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737026003237 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004, Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003
- 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063002167 · DOI
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [PISA 2003: Studies on competence development over a school year]
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 29
- 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/461723 · DOI
- Reynolds MC, 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
- 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2673267 · DOI
- Scheerens J, 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
- 10.1080/15366360701487021 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701486965 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt WH, 2007, The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. Mathematics teaching in the 21st century (MT21)
- 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701492880 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00035-8 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654307310317 · DOI
- Sfard A, 2003, A research companion for NCTM standards, 353
- Shavelson RJ, 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer, 1
- Sherin MG, 1996, The nature and dynamics of teachers’ content knowledge
- Shuell T, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 726
- Shulman LS, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 399
- 10.2307/749346 · DOI
- 10.1080/03057640701372426 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312027004639 · DOI
- 10.1080/002202797183928 · DOI
- Stigler J, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
- 10.3102/00028312032002227 · DOI
- 10.2307/749683 · DOI
- 10.2307/749194 · DOI
- 10.2307/749339 · DOI
- Tymms P, 2004, But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research, 55
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation, 2003, Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 2006, The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom
- Vosniadou S, 2005, Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, 55
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.014 · DOI
- Walberg HJ, 2000, Effective educational practices
- 10.3102/0034654308320292 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063003249 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543073001089 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson SM, 2003, Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions
- Winship C, 2007, Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research
- Wu ML, 1997, ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software manual
- Zeichner KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 645
- Zumwalt KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
How and why do Chinese urban students outperform their rural counterparts?
Zhao, G., Ye, J., Li, Z., & Xue, S. (2017) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2017.06.006 · Cited by 73
Stürmer, K., Könings, K., & Seidel, T. (2015) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-014-9122-z · Cited by 63
“Researchers have recently answered this criticism with the development and use of standardized knowledge tests (Baumert et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2005; Kleickmann et al. 2012; Voss et al. 2011) based on Shulman’s proposed structure of teacher knowledge in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and generic pe…”
BackgroundSchiering, D., Sorge, S., Keller, M. M., & Neumann, K. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21793 · Cited by 88
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Sunbury, S. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164 · Cited by 80
“However, direct empirical support for such a belief is surprisingly scarce (Borasi, 1994; Jacobs et al. , 2007; Baumert et al. , 2010; Heller, 2010).”
The impact of student misconceptions on student persistence in a MOOC
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., Sasselov, D. D., & Fredericks, C. (2019) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21616 · Cited by 83
“Knowledge of student misconceptions has long been considered a crucial element of a teacher's skill (Baumert et al., 2010; Ergönenç, Neumann, & Fischer, 2014; Keller, Neumann, & Fischer, 2017; Sadler et al., 2013).”
BackgroundDistributed leadership and innovative teaching practices
O'Shea, C. M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100088 · Cited by 62
Trixa, J., & Kaspar, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336436 · Cited by 49
Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1276641 · Cited by 73
“…relationship we found between PCK and students’ performance is in line with the results of different studies related to mathematics teachers’ PCK (Baumert et al., 2010; Fennema et al., 1996; Kunter et al., 2013), physics teachers’ PCK (Sadler et al., 2013), or primary science teachers’ PCK…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCharalambous, C. Y. (2015) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-015-9318-7 · Cited by 75
“For example, Baumert et al. (2010) found that pedagogical content knowledge was a more powerful predictor of instructional quality than teachers’ knowledge of the content.”
BackgroundInfluentialMeasuring Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Fractions With Drawn Quantities
Izsák, A., Jacobson, E., de Araujo, Z., & Orrill, C. (2012) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0391 · Cited by 61
“2008; Hill, Schilling, & Ball, 2004), the Diagnostic Mathematics Assessments for Middle School Teachers project (Saderholm, Ronau, Brown, & Collins, 2010), the SimCalc project (Shechtman, Roschelle, Haertel, & Knudsen, 2010), the Knowledge of Algebra for Teaching project (Senk, 2010), and the COACTIV study (Baumert et…”
BackgroundRosenkränzer, F., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Rieß, W. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1362603 · Cited by 79
“It is not surprising then that several studies provide evidence for a positive relationship between teachers’ CK and their students’ learning progress (Abell, 2007; Baumert et al., 2009; Hashweh, 2005).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Relations Among School Climate, Instructional Quality, and Achievement Motivation in Mathematics
Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2016) · IEA research for education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8_3 · Cited by 94
“Moreover, while the well-recognized research in this fi eld is often restricted to German-speaking countries (see Baumert et al. 2010; Klieme et al. 2009) and English-speaking countries (Brophy 2006; Good et al. 2009), our fi ndings support previous research in general, but also contribute to…”
InfluentialOstermann, A., Leuders, T., & Nückles, M. (2017) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-017-9369-z · Cited by 56
Stender, A., Brückmann, M., & Neumann, K. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1351645 · Cited by 85
“…of teachers focuses on Shulman’s conceptualisation (1987) of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) as the knowledge base for teachers designing their lessons (Baumert et al., 2010; Cochran, DeRuiter, & King, 1993; Gess-Newsome, 1999; Grossman, 1990; Magnusson, Krajcik, & Borko, 1999; Shulman, 1986).”
BackgroundTyminski, A. M., Zambak, V. S., Drake, C., & Land, T. J. (2013) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9261-4 · Cited by 65
Soziale Unterstützung beim Berufseinstieg ins Lehramt
Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., & Baumert, J. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-011-0173-8 · Cited by 59
Self-citationHolzberger, D., Maurer, C., Kunina‐Habenicht, O., & Kunter, M. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103285 · Cited by 73
Self-citationFostering systems thinking in student teachers of biology and geography – an intervention study
Fanta, D., Braeutigam, J., & Riess, W. (2020) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2019.1569083 · Cited by 58
Großschedl, J., Welter, V. D. E., & Harms, U. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21482 · Cited by 70
Professional learning as a predictor for instructional quality: a secondary analysis of TALIS
Doğan, S., & Yurtseven, N. (2018) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1383274 · Cited by 58
“As a result, instructional quality is manifested as a collective and inclusive way of using multiple teaching practices (Baumert et al., 2010), which is adapted and used throughout this study.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFütterer, T., Scheiter, K., Cheng, X. C., & Stürmer, K. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102042 · Cited by 80
Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Star, J. R. (2020) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-020-01148-8 · Cited by 80
Kang, E. J. S., Donovan, C. B., & McCarthy, M. J. (2018) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1046560x.2017.1415616 · Cited by 74
“PCK has been measured through case studies (e.g., Borko & Livingston, 1989; Morrison & Luttenenger, 2015), scenario-based written assessments (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010), and group tasks of examining how to best teach a topic (e.g., Loughran, Mulhall, & Berry, 2004).”
MethodKnowledge of curriculum embedded mathematics: exploring a critical domain of teaching
Remillard, J., & Kim, O.-K. (2017) · doi:10.1007/s10649-017-9757-4 · Cited by 57
Assessing Professional Vision in Teacher Candidates
Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000200 · Cited by 57
“It has also made progress in providing empirical evidence of the structure in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and generic pedagogical knowledge by using standardized knowledge tests (Baumert et al., 2010; Blömeke et al., 2009; Döhrmann, Kaiser, & Blömeke, 2012; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005; Voss, Kunter…”
BackgroundGroßschedl, J., Mahler, D., Kleickmann, T., & Harms, U. (2014) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.923949 · Cited by 59
“Although some researchers emphasize the superior validity of open-ended items (Baumert et al., 2010; Schoenfeld, 2007), others observed no difference between open-ended and closed-ended items (Bridgeman & Lewis, 1994).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDeveloping mathematical knowledge for teaching in a methods course: the case of function
Steele, M. D., Hillen, A. F., & Smith, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9243-6 · Cited by 60
“There is substantial evidence that differences in mathematical knowledge for teaching are linked both to the quality of mathematics instruction that teachers enact and the substance of student learning that results (Baumert et al. 2010; Charalambous 2010; Hill et al. 2005; Tchoshanov 2011).”
BackgroundBlömeke, S., Buchholtz, N. F., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2013) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.10.007 · Cited by 49
Mappadang, A., Khusaini, K., Sinaga, M., & Elizabeth, E. (2022) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2022.2101326 · Cited by 56
“The appropriate method, good learning environment, and students’ active involvement create good learning quality through lecturer support (Baumert et al., 2010; Longobardi et al., 2018; Praetorius et al., 2018; Warwas & Helm, 2018), thus, it is expected to affect students’ academic result.”
MethodMiyamoto, A., Murayama, K., & Lechner, C. M. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101921 · Cited by 56
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_9 · Cited by 59
Self-citationInfluence of Curriculum Reform: An Analysis of Student Mathematics Achievement in Mainland China.
Ni, Y.-J., Li, Q., Li, X., & Zhang, Z.-H. (2011) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.005 · Cited by 56
“Baumert et al. (2010) demonstrated that the effect of teacher pedagogical content knowledge on student learning was also mediated by the teachers’ providing cognitive learning supports to individual students.”
BackgroundPouta, M., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09536-y · Cited by 55
“Teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge, mediated by individual instructing, is known to have a positive effect on students’ learning (Baumert et al. 2010).”
Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.03.001 · Cited by 83
The same in German as in English? Investigating the subject-specificity of teaching quality
Praetorius, A., Vieluf, S., Saß, S., Bernholt, A., & Klieme, E. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-015-0660-4 · Cited by 58
“Classroom management depends on teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge (see e.g., Baumert et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialZhu, Y., & Kaiser, G. (2022) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-022-01343-9 · Cited by 78
“However, these few known studies—COACTIV (Baumert et al., 2010), TEDS-Instruct/ Validate (König et al.”
ResultKemethofer, D., Helm, C., & Warwas, J. (2022) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2021.2021294 · Cited by 86
“Based on research about instructional quality and teacher effectiveness (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; Kunter et al., 2013), we selected 32 items referring to 10 distinguishable aspects of desirable instructional practices which themselves are well compatible with the three overarching ‘basic…”
Teaching and Learning About Whole Numbers in Primary School
Nunes, T., Dorneles, B., Lin, P., & Rathgeb-Schnierer, E. (2016) · ICME-13 topical surveys · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45113-8 · Cited by 54
“…of Shulman’s ideas about content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge, some researchers have found that these two are clearly related (e.g., Baumert et al. 2010; Hill 2010), particularly when the measures used focus on the same topic—for example, knowledge of operations with fractions and…”
BackgroundKulgemeyer, C., Borowski, A., Buschhüter, D., Enkrott, P., Kempin, M., Reinhold, P., Riese, J., Schecker, H., Schröder, J., & Vogelsang, C. (2020) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21632 · Cited by 53
“CK also has a positive influence mediated by PCK (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodHolzberger, D., Praetorius, A., Seidel, T., & Kunter, M. (2019) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-018-00410-8 · Cited by 74
“…research focusing on continuous linear relationships between teaching quality and student outcomes, we hypothesize that students taught by teachers who prioritize cognitive activating behaviors will themselves achieve more positive cognitive gains (Baumert et al. 2010; Klieme et al. 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSinnema, C. E. L., Meyer, F., & Aitken, G. (2016) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487116668017 · Cited by 77
Die DZLM-Gestaltungsprinzipien für Fortbildungen
Barzel, B., & Selter, C. (2015) · Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik · doi:10.1007/s13138-015-0076-y · Cited by 53
Tröbst, S., Kleickmann, T., Heinze, A., Bernholt, A., Rink, R., & Kunter, M. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000260 · Cited by 60
“In line with this, pedagogical content knowledge has been found to predict both quality of instruction and student achievement (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005; Sadler, Sonnert, Coyle, CookSmith, & Miller, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMunter, C., & Correnti, R. (2017) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/689928 · Cited by 52
“Similarly, in a one-year study of grade 10 students and teachers in Germany, Baumert et al. (2010) found relations between their own assessment of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and both instructional practice and student learning gains.”
BackgroundPreservice Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and Its Relation to Academic Self-Concept
Paulick, I., Großschedl, J., Harms, U., & Möller, J. (2016) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487116639263 · Cited by 52
“preservice teacher education, science teacher education, teacher knowledge learning progress of students (Abell, 2007; Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultDeveloping learning progression‐based teacher knowledge measures
Jin, H., Shin, H. J., Johnson, M., Kim, J., & Anderson, C. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21243 · Cited by 46
Holzberger, D., & Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2021) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2021.1913190 · Cited by 68
“Baumert et al. (2010) identified differences between non-academic and academic tracks only with regard to the cognitive and curricular level of tasks and respectful treatment of the students.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2021) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101489 · Cited by 57
Kelcey, B., Hill, H. C., & Chin, M. J. (2019) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2019.1570944 · Cited by 68
“Only Baumert et al. (2010) examined non-mathematical aspects of instruction.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFiebelkorn, F., & Menzel, S. (2013) · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9323-0 · Cited by 51
Neugebauer, M. (2013) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-013-0343-y · Cited by 77
“…Benachteiligung der Kinder auf niedrigeren Schulstufen an, nicht nur weil die Ausbildung für diese Lehrämter weniger Kompetenzen vermittelt (Baumert et al. 2010), sondern auch weil die Studierenden die vorhandenen Lerngelegenheiten aufgrund ihrer unvorteilhaften Eingangsmerkmale womöglich…”
BackgroundBlömeke, S., & Olsen, R. V. (2018) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.018 · Cited by 79
Teaching matters: A longitudinal study of mathematics teachers’ knowledge growth
Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103949 · Cited by 50
Dynamics of mental model construction from text and graphics
Hochpöchler, U., Schnotz, W., Rasch, T., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0156-z · Cited by 48
Self-citationDavis, B., & Renert, M. (2013) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9424-8 · Cited by 50
Mu, J., Bayrak, A., & Ufer, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.994739 · Cited by 64
“almost independently from each other (Baumert et al., 2010).”
Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Doleck, T. (2021) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-021-10028-1 · Cited by 49
“…body of research has highlighted the importance of teachers’ understanding of the subject matter in teaching and student learning (e.g., Copur-Gencturk, 2015; Baumert et al., 2010; Borko et al., 1992; Campbell et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2008; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005; Tchoshanov, 2011).”
BackgroundGasteiger, H., Bruns, J., Benz, C., Brunner, E., & Sprenger, P. (2020) · Zdm · doi:10.1007/s11858-019-01103-2 · Cited by 49
Liepertz, S., & Borowski, A. (2018) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1478165 · Cited by 49
“…teaching, the Professional Competence of Teachers, Cognitively Activating Instruction, and Development of Students’ Mathematical Literacy (COACTIV) study showed that student achievement was positively influenced by PCK, mediated by the level of cognitive activation in class (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWilhelm, A., Munter, C., & Jackson, K. (2017) · The Elementary school journal · doi:10.1086/690113 · Cited by 49
“…attempted tomeasure a number of factors that influence teachers’ enactment of high-quality mathematics instruction, including teachers’ knowledge, conceptions, and experience (Baumert et al., 2010; Copur-Gencturk, 2015; Hill et al., 2008; Stipek, Givvin, Salmon, & MacGyvers, 2001; Wilhelm, 2014).”
BackgroundJüttner, M., & Neuhaus, B. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.606511 · Cited by 49
“…researchers in the field of science education still use this work to organise research efforts or to design and carry out research studies (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; van Driel, Beijaard, & Verloop, 2001; Hashweh, 2005; Hill, Ball, & Schilling, 2008; Lee & Luft, 2008; Loughran, Mulhall, &…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDeterminanten der Schulleistung
Brühwiler, C., Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-15083-9_13 · Cited by 49
Senden, B., Nilsen, T., & Blömeke, S. (2022) · Ways of Analyzing Teaching Quality · doi:10.18261/9788215045054-2021-05 · Cited by 56
Leijen, Ä., Malva, L., Pedaste, M., & Mikser, R. (2022) · Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice · doi:10.1080/13540602.2022.2062710 · Cited by 48
“Moreover, some studies have used the word ‘generic’ instead of, or interchangeably with, ‘general’ (Baumert et al., 2010; Tröbst et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDoes it Matter What We Measure? Domain-specific Professional Knowledge of Physics Teachers
Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. (2018) · Swiss Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.24452/sjer.37.3.4963 · Cited by 48
“mentioned studies such as COACTIV (Baumert et al., 2010), we analysed – with respect to quality of instruction – teachers’ actions in supporting students’ cognitive activation in classroom lessons.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDavidowitz, B., & Potgieter, M. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1196843 · Cited by 49
“that with low CK, there can be little TSPCK or as stated by Baumert et al. (2010) ‘PCK is inconceivable without a substantial level of CK’ (p.”
BackgroundKrämer, C., König, J., Strauß, S., & Kaspar, K. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101624 · Cited by 64
Inadequacies in the SES–Achievement model: Evidence from PISA and other studies
Marks, G. N., & O'Connell, M. (2021) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3293 · Cited by 47
Copur-Gencturk, Y., Li, J., & Atabas, S. (2024) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312241248514 · Cited by 47
“…artifact approach has been used by researchers to assess instructional quality because of its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and less disruptive collection of multiple snapshots of teachers’ instruction (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Boston, 2012; Clare & Aschbacher, 2001; Joyce et al., 2018).”
InfluentialMientus, L., Hume, A., Wulff, P., Meiners, A., & Borowski, A. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12060385 · Cited by 76
“PCK emerged as a particularly important construct for science teachers because it has the potential to characterise expert teachers’ professional knowledge and skills and predict effective teaching [5,6,12].”
BackgroundSteinmayr, R., Lazarides, R., Weidinger, A. F., & Christiansen, H. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000306 · Cited by 68
Does what you get depend on who you are with? Effects of student composition on teaching quality
Fauth, B., Atlay, C., Dumont, H., & Decristan, J. (2021) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101355 · Cited by 47
Ren, L., & Smith, W. (2017) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-017-9365-3 · Cited by 55
Noticing numeracy now! Examining changes in preservice teachers’ noticing, knowledge, and attitudes
Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J., Schack, E., Jong, C., & Tassell, J. (2018) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/s13394-017-0228-0 · Cited by 47
Yi, H. S., & Lee, Y. (2016) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-016-9455-4 · Cited by 53
Bravo, P., & Cofré, H. (2016) · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1249983 · Cited by 47
“For this reason, other authors have preferred to develop quantitative tools to measure PCK on biology (Schmelzing et al., 2013) or mathematics topics (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCallingham, R., Carmichael, C., & Watson, J. (2016) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9653-2 · Cited by 47
“PCK could be considered as a measure of teacher quality, with teachers having higher levels of PCK being more likely to teach classes showing gains in content knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2004, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialWeißenrieder, J., Roesken-Winter, B., Schueler, S., Binner, E., & Blömeke, S. (2015) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0673-8 · Cited by 47
The Role of Large-Scale Assessments in Research on Educational Effectiveness and School Development
Klieme, E. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4629-9_7 · Cited by 47
Shreiner, T. L., & Dykes, B. M. (2020) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2020.1850382 · Cited by 54
“Pedagogical content knowledge (hereafter, PCK) has been a particularly compelling construct among educational researchers (e.g., Ball et al., 2008; Baumert et al., 2010; Charalambous & Hill, 2012; Hill & Charalambous, 2012; Monte-Sano & Budano, 2012; Shulman, 1986), who have widely agreed that it is important in teach…”
BackgroundOpportunities to Learn for Teachers’ Self‐Efficacy and Enthusiasm
Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/4698371 · Cited by 76
“This is supported by studies that found no direct relationship between CK and students’ achievement [104–106] or found that PCK is the less relevant predictor for students’ achievement [74].”
BackgroundResultLee, H.-Y., Chung, C.-Y., & Wei, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.765233 · Cited by 45
“For in-service teachers, teachers’ professional knowledge may become the main focus as it has been proved to be a key predictor of instructional quality, teachers’ professional knowledge may become the main focus (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundLazarides, R., & Raufelder, D. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12352 · Cited by 62
“…challenging tasks to their students, refer to students’ prior knowledge (Hiebert & Grouws, 2007), encourage students to find multiple solution ways (Baumert et al., 2010), to generate own solution pathways, or to evaluate own and other’s solutions or ideas (Stefanou, Perencevich, DiCintio, &…”
BackgroundUsing TIMSS items to evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional practices
Eriksson, K., Helenius, O., & Ryve, A. (2018) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-018-9473-1 · Cited by 57
Classroom disciplinary climate of schools and gender – evidence from the Nordic countries
Sortkær, B., & Reimer, D. (2018) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1460382 · Cited by 62
“These studies used classroom-level data from both the primary (Baumert et al., 2010; Fauth, Decristan, Rieser, Klieme, & Büttner, 2014; Kunter et al., 2013) and secondary school level (Klieme, Pauli, & Reusser, 2009) and found significant associations between classroom management and student…”
MethodDecker, A., Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2014) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-014-0227-4 · Cited by 50
Self-citationHertel, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-04479-4_2 · Cited by 45
Uncovering the Special Mathematical Work of Teaching
Ball, D. (2017) · ICME-13 monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_2 · Cited by 45
“Studies have ranged from investigations of what teachers (and preservice teachers) know (or lack) (e.g., Ball, 1990; Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, 2007; Rowland et al., 2005; Thompson, 1984); what teachers learn from interventions, or other opportunities to learn mathematics (e.”
BackgroundInfluentialLauermann, F., Meißner, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000377 · Cited by 65
Teacher Characteristics and Student Learning in Mathematics: A Comprehensive Assessment
Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Chin, M. J. (2018) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904818755468 · Cited by 50
“Other studies, drawing on Shulman’s (1986) framework, have shown that teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics better predicts student learning than pure, or basic, content knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010; Campbell et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialTowards a framework for effective instructional explanations in science teaching
Kulgemeyer, C. (2018) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2018.1598054 · Cited by 68
Understanding teachers' pedagogical knowledge
Sonmark, K., Révai, N., Gottschalk, F., Deligiannidi, K., & Burns, T. (2017) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/43332ebd-en · Cited by 59
Alivernini, F., Manganelli, S., & Lucidi, F. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.010 · Cited by 44
Kersting, N., Sutton, T., Kalinec-Craig, C., Stoehr, K., Heshmati, S., Lozano, G. I., & Stigler, J. (2016) · Zdm · doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0733-0 · Cited by 44
“…able to show that pedagogical content knowledge could be distinguished empirically from content knowledge and that pedagogical content knowledge had a substantial positive effect on student learning that was mediated by cognitive activation and individual learning resources (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundKnowledge for teaching secondary school mathematics: what counts?
Goos, M. (2013) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2013.826387 · Cited by 44
“[13] showed that PCK was decisive in influencing both the quality of instruction and students’ learning gains and that content knowledge alone is insufficient for effective teaching of secondary school mathematics.”
BackgroundInfluentialMathematicians’ Perspectives on Features of a Good Pedagogical Proof
Lai, Y., Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2012) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.661814 · Cited by 39
“( 2010 ) studied the relationship between instruction and pedagogical content knowledge, which includes knowledge of students.”
BackgroundBlömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011) · doi:10.1177/0022487110386798 · Cited by 44
“Because MCK can be regarded as an important precondition for applying MPCK successfully in class on a cognitively demanding and flexible level (Baumert et al., 2010), efforts to enhance the mathematics knowledge of U.S. primary teachers seem to be meaningful.”
BackgroundVosniadou, S., Bodner, E., Stephenson, H., Jeffries, D., Lawson, M. J., Darmawan, I. N., Kang, S. H. K., Graham, L. E., & Dignath, C. (2024) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-024-09374-1 · Cited by 65
“Teachers’ design and implementation of tasks and activities is considered a fundamental aspect of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and has been found to be predictive of student knowledge gains in mathematics (Baumert et al., 2010).”
Kramer, M., Förtsch, C., Boone, W. J., Seidel, T., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11030089 · Cited by 55
“[38]) and previous findings on the importance of content-related knowledge facets for subject-specific instructional quality [33,34], PCK can be considered as a pivotal knowledge facet of teachers’ diagnostic competences when the diagnostic focus is on subject-specific instructional aspects.”
BackgroundMethodRevisiting the Relationship Between International Assessment Outcomes and Educational Production
Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., Loyalka, P., Schmidt, W., & Zakharov, A. (2016) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831216653180 · Cited by 43
“…has also tried to address these problems by following up 9th graders in the PISA 2003 International Assessment Outcomes and Educational Production sample with a curriculum-based student test in the 10th grade and by testing teachers on their subject matter teaching knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-180
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2141462352
- Cited by
- 2,100
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 165.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review