The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress
Open accessAbstract
In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Baumert et al. (2010:139) argue that MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and “reflection on classroom experience”.”
From Mentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers (2020) · cites this paper as Baumert et al. (2010:139)
In the citing paper
“Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic (Baumert et al., 2010)”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Baumert et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812
Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory
Warm, T. A. (1989) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294627 · Cited by 1,216
Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312906 · Cited by 1,164 · cited 1×
“…affect students’ learning gains and motivational development (Bransford, Darling-Hammond, & LePage, 2005; Bransford, Derry, Berliner, & Hammerness, 2005; Grossman & McDonald, 2008; Grossman & Schoenfeld, 2005; Hiebert, Morris, Berk, & Jansen, 2007; Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001; Reynolds, 1989).”
Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/428763 · Cited by 902 · cited 13×
“In contrast to Hill and colleagues (Hill et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2007), who conceptualized mathematical knowledge for teaching as an amalgam of the mathematical everyday knowledge that all educated adults should have, a purely mathematical understanding of topics typically taught at school, and mathematical knowled…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCreating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 124
- 10.3102/0013189X07308739 · DOI
- American Council on Education, 1999, To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught
- 10.3102/0162373707313409 · DOI
- 10.1086/461626 · DOI · Paper page
- Ball DL, 1991, Advances in research on teaching: Vol 2 Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, 1
- Ball DL, 2003, Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 3
- Ball DL, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 433
- 10.1111/0161-4681.00046 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · DOI
- Berliner CD, 1994, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, 161
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, 171
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung [Professional competence of student teachers—Knowledge, beliefs, and learning opportunities of mathematics teacher candidates: Initial findings on the effectiveness of teacher training]
- Bollen KA, 1993, Testing structural equation models
- 10.2307/749118 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312026004473 · DOI
- Bransford J, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 1
- Bransford JD, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 40
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Brophy J, 2000, Teaching
- Carstensen CH, 2004, PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs, 371
- Cochran-Smith M, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
- 10.3102/0002831208323280 · DOI
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.76.4.d8277u8778245404 · DOI
- De Corte E, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 491
- 10.1080/00220270701305362 · DOI
- Ditton H, 2007, Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen [Competence building and careers in the education system: Results of a longitudinal study in elementary schools]
- 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193 · DOI
- 10.2307/749384 · DOI
- 10.2307/749215 · DOI
- 10.2307/749875 · DOI
- Fennema E, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
- Floden RE, 2005, Studying teacher education, 261
- 10.3102/00028312032004687 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9 · DOI
- Goe L, 2007, The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis
- 10.3102/01623737022002129 · DOI
- Goodson IF, 1998, Subject knowledge: Readings for the study of school subjects
- Goodson IF, 1996, Studying school subjects
- Greeno JG, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 15
- Grossman PL, 1995, International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 20
- 10.1177/0022487107310748 · DOI
- Grossman PL, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
- Harbison RW, 1992, Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil
- Heaton RM, 2000, Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance
- Heller K, 2000, Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12 + R) [Cognitive Abilities Test for Grades 4 to 12, revision]
- Helmke A, 2009, Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: Diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]
- 10.1177/0022487106295726 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737027002111 · DOI
- 10.3102/0162373707301711 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701487138 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904807307061 · DOI
- Jordan A, 2006, Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematical tasks: Documentation of the task categorization in the COACTIV study]
- 10.1023/A:1025175812582 · DOI
- Krauss S, 2008, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 873
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
- Kunter M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 161
- Kunter M, 2009, Lehrprofessionalität—Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, 153
- Kunter M, 2007, Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme, 32
- Lanahan L, 2005, Fundamental problems in the measurement of instructional processes: Estimating reasonable effect sizes and conceptualizing what is important to measure
- Leinhardt G, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 333
- 10.1177/0022487108315581 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410602589 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312038002321 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
- Mewborn D, 2003, A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 45
- Mitchell R, 1999, Thinking K–16, 3, 1
- 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/447369 · DOI
- Munby H, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 877
- Muthén LK, 2004, Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- 10.3102/00028312037001123 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737026003237 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004, Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003
- 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063002167 · DOI
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [PISA 2003: Studies on competence development over a school year]
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 29
- 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/461723 · DOI
- Reynolds MC, 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
- 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2673267 · DOI
- Scheerens J, 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
- 10.1080/15366360701487021 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701486965 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt WH, 2007, The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. Mathematics teaching in the 21st century (MT21)
- 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701492880 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00035-8 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654307310317 · DOI
- Sfard A, 2003, A research companion for NCTM standards, 353
- Shavelson RJ, 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer, 1
- Sherin MG, 1996, The nature and dynamics of teachers’ content knowledge
- Shuell T, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 726
- Shulman LS, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 399
- 10.2307/749346 · DOI
- 10.1080/03057640701372426 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312027004639 · DOI
- 10.1080/002202797183928 · DOI
- Stigler J, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
- 10.3102/00028312032002227 · DOI
- 10.2307/749683 · DOI
- 10.2307/749194 · DOI
- 10.2307/749339 · DOI
- Tymms P, 2004, But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research, 55
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation, 2003, Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 2006, The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom
- Vosniadou S, 2005, Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, 55
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.014 · DOI
- Walberg HJ, 2000, Effective educational practices
- 10.3102/0034654308320292 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063003249 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543073001089 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson SM, 2003, Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions
- Winship C, 2007, Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research
- Wu ML, 1997, ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software manual
- Zeichner KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 645
- Zumwalt KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Hascher, T., Hagenauer, G., & Sacchi, S. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102295 · Cited by 18
Wächter, T., Gorges, J., Apresjan, S., & Lütje-Klose, B. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104411 · Cited by 26
“…´ e, 2013; Morinaj & Hascher, 2022; Park, 2004), especially after they transition from elementary to secondary school (Coffey, 2013; Maaz, Gresch, McElvany, Jonkmann, & Baumert, 2010) and face the challenge of adapting to a new school environment (Knoppick, Becker, Neumann, Maaz, & Baumert, 2015).”
Chen, X., Leung, F., & She, J. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101289 · Cited by 32
Mathematical knowledge for teaching and mathematics didactic knowledge: a comparative study
Scheiner, T., Buchholtz, N., & Kaiser, G. (2023) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-023-09598-z · Cited by 16
“…as the Mathematics Teaching and Learning to Teach project (Ball et al., 2005; Hill et al., 2005), the Cognitive Activation in the Classroom project (Baumert et al., 2010; Kunter et al., 2013), and the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (Blömeke et al., 2014; Tatto et al., 2012).”
Jang, J., Yoo, H., & Rubadeau, K. (2023) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-023-09892-8 · Cited by 20
“A predictor of student achievement (Baumert et al., 2010), cognitive activation focuses on students’ critical understanding of what they are learning.”
Glassow, L. N., Hansen, K. Y., & Gustafsson, J. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101255 · Cited by 28
Direct and indirect influences of familial socioeconomic status on students’ science achievement
Tan, C.-Y. (2022) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2022.2139672 · Cited by 16
“Personal learning support practices are exemplified by teachers adapting their instructional approaches to build on students’ prior knowledge and cater to students’ learning needs, providing support to their students’ learning, and leveraging feedback to help students improve (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundGuill, K., Ömeroğulları, M., & Köller, O. (2021) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-021-00581-x · Cited by 16
Zitzmann, S., Wagner, W., Hecht, M., Helm, C., Fischer, C., Bardach, L., & Göllner, R. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09635-4 · Cited by 21
O'Meara, N., & Faulkner, F. (2021) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2021.1899026 · Cited by 16
“Similarly, in the UK, Reynolds and Muijs (1999) found teacher knowledge plays a crucial role in effective teaching practices while in the U.S., Baumert et al. (2010) found a correlation to exist between MKT, classroom pedagogy and student achievement.”
BackgroundHeemsoth, T., Boe, L. A., Bükers, F., & Krieger, C. (2020) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2020.1850668 · Cited by 16
“Pedagogical content knowledge is assumed to be a core facet of professional competence and has been found to signi fi cantly predict students ’ learning progress in other fi elds of study (Baumert et al. 2010).”
BackgroundTatto, M. T., Rodriguez, M. C., & Reckase, M. D. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103118 · Cited by 18
Exploring differences in mathematical knowledge for teaching for prospective and practicing teachers
Phelps, G., Howell, H., & Liu, S. (2019) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-019-01097-x · Cited by 16
Vega, M. G. A. (2020) · International Multidisciplinary Research Journal · doi:10.54476/iimrj377 · Cited by 16
“…ways of thinking such as creativity, critical thinking, decision-making, problem-solving, and learning which further connects to the framework of education teachers’ professional development which is a key factor for learners’ achievement (Baumert et al., 2010; Bakkenes, 2010; and Parker, 2016).”
BackgroundDorfner, T., Förtsch, C., Boone, W. J., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9663-x · Cited by 18
Stimulating pre-service teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers
Depaepe, F., Roy, P. V., Torbeyns, J., Kleickmann, T., Dooren, W. V., & Verschaffel, L. (2018) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-018-9822-7 · Cited by 26
“In particular, teachers’ CK and PCK are important predictors of instructional quality (Baumert et al., 2010; Blömeke et al., 2008; Kunter et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSaderholm, J. C., Ronau, R. N., Rakes, C. R., Bush, S. B., & Mohr‐Schroeder, M. J. (2016) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1251485 · Cited by 22
How teachers perceive their expertise: The role of dimensional and social comparisons
Paulick, I., Großschedl, J., Harms, U., & Möller, J. (2017) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.007 · Cited by 16
Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Leiß, D., & Blum, W. F. (2017) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_26 · Cited by 13
Self-citationBegrich, L., Fauth, B., Kunter, M., & Klieme, E. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-017-0730-x · Cited by 19
Self-citationKessler, A., Stein, M. K., & Schunn, C. D. (2015) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-015-9248-6 · Cited by 19
“Whether referred to as ‘‘cognitively activating’’ (Baumert et al. 2010) or ‘‘high cognitive demand’’ (Stein et al. 1996), there is general consensus regarding what constitutes low-versus high-levels of challenge.”
BackgroundPeters, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9242-7 · Cited by 16
“Visions of graduating statistically thinking students can only be realized if the students are taught by competent statistical thinkers, as suggested by research that connects teacher knowledge with student achievement (Baumert et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2005).”
BackgroundPreparing primary teachers in the United States: balancing selection and preparation
Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. S. (2012) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0372-z · Cited by 16
Teaching Financial Literacy: Competence, Context and Strategies among Swedish Teachers.
Björklund, M. (2019) · doi:10.4119/jsse-1426 · Cited by 16
“(2004) and Schilling and Hill (2007) could not empirically distinguish CKC nor SKC (Baumert et al., 2010), but in this study a presupposition is that both sub-constructs are applicable to social studies teachers’ financial literacy CK.”
InfluentialProfessionswissen in den Naturwissenschaften (ProwiN)
Kirschner, S., Sczudlek, M., Tepner, O., Borowski, A., Fischer, H., Lenske, G., Leutner, D., Neuhaus, B., Sumfleth, E., Thillmann, H., et al. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-07274-2_7 · Cited by 16
Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_18 · Cited by 16
“Some empirical studies show that cognitive activation is a key variable that infl uences students’ achievements (Baumert et al. 2010 ).”
BackgroundLindström, M., Johansson, S., & Borger, L. (2024) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2024.2367486 · Cited by 19
“…and subject matter knowledge necessary for meaningful mathematics teaching (Coenen et al., 2018; Gustafsson & Nilsen, 2016) promoting student outcomes (Baumert et al., 2010; Blömeke et al., 2016; Coenen et al., 2018; Hill et al., 2019; Kunter et al., 2013; Lee & Lee, 2020; Toropova et al., 2019).”
InfluentialTeacher Subject Knowledge, Didactic Skills, and Student Learning in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa
Bietenbeck, J., Irmert, N., & Sepahvand, M. H. (2022) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102437 · Cited by 17
Wollmann, K., & Lange-Schubert, K. (2022) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12060381 · Cited by 15
Supporting student motivation in class: the motivational potential of tasks
Heinle, A., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Reinhold, F., Heine, J.-H., & Holzberger, D. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-022-01090-3 · Cited by 15
Examining Pre-service Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through Lesson Study
Conceição, T., Baptista, M., & da Ponte, J. P. (2021) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/11442 · Cited by 23
“Then it is important to stimulate the teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) since their initial training (Baumert et al. 2010; Kind, 2009, 2017; Nilsson & Loughran, 2012).”
BackgroundManifesting of pedagogical content knowledge on trigonometry in teachers practice
Spangenberg, E. (2021) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.2021371325 · Cited by 15
“(2010), the breadth and depth of teachers‟ KSM determine the variety of teaching strategies and the types of alternative mathematical representations teachers will use in their teaching of a particular topic to students (Baumert et al., 2010) as well as how they will link topics across different grades (Walsh et al.”
BackgroundWiens, P. D., Calkins, L., Yoder, P. J., & Hightower, A. (2021) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2021.05.006 · Cited by 22
Talukder, M. M. R., Green, C. D., & Mamun-ur-Rashid, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06050 · Cited by 15
Gunzenhauser, C., Enke, S., Johann, V. E., Karbach, J., & Saalbach, H. (2021) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584211065710 · Cited by 23
Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Lei, Y. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01209-x · Cited by 18
Fachdidaktisches Wissen von angehenden Sportlehrkräften messen
Heemsoth, T., & Wibowo, J. (2020) · German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research · doi:10.1007/s12662-020-00643-0 · Cited by 21
Ekmekci, A., Corkin, D., & Fan, W. (2019) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2019v44n12.4 · Cited by 12
“Adding to these findings, Baumert et al. (2010) found that teachers’ domain-specific instructional knowledge seemed to be of key significance for student progress in mathematics.”
ResultWeinhuber, M., Lachner, A., Leuders, T., & Nückles, M. (2019) · Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000227 · Cited by 15
Teacher Knowledge and Instructional Quality of Beginning Teachers: Growth and Linkages
Desimone, L., Hochberg, E., & Mcmaken, J. (2016) · Teachers College Record · doi:10.1177/016146811611800507 · Cited by 15
“…example, across content areas the literature substantiates that general content knowledge, such as what might be taught in a college-level math course, provides an insufficient knowledge base for teaching content to children (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill & Ball, 2009; Morine-Dershimer & Kent, 1999).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2015) · doi:10.5032/jae.2015.03090 · Cited by 15
“Ultimately, ways to strengthen PCK in beginning teachers could lead to increased student progress (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundNachbauer, M. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101367 · Cited by 21
Pädagogisches Wissen von Lehramtsstudierenden im Praxissemester: Ziel schulpraktischen Lernens?
König, J. A., Darge, K., Klemenz, S., & Seifert, A. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-19536-6_11 · Cited by 15
Facetten adaptiven Unterrichts aus der Sicht der Unterrichtsforschung
Martschinke, S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-11346-9_2 · Cited by 15
Diagnostic Competence of (Prospective) Teachers in Vocational Education
Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-191-7_17 · Cited by 15
Prenzel, M., Kobarg, M., Schöps, K., & Rönnebeck, S. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4458-5 · Cited by 15
Artificial intelligence in K-12 instruction: the role of teacher professional development
Mah, D.-K., Groß, N., Egloffstein, M., & Prilop, C. N. (2026) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-026-00442-4 · Cited by 22
“Cognitive activation is achieved by implementing instructional strategies that present students with challenging tasks and stimulate higher-level thinking processes (Baumert et al., 2010; Klieme et al., 2009).”
Backfisch, I., Scherer, R., Schneider, J. M., & Lachner, A. (2025) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100718 · Cited by 22
Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Orrill, C. (2023) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-023-09615-1 · Cited by 14
“Given that CK and PCK are important indicators of the quality of teachers’ instruction and students’ learning (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2005; Kersting et al., 2012) and they are distinct elements of the content-specific expertise needed in teaching (e.g., Copur-Gencturk & Tolar, 2022),…”
Social–emotional skills of teachers: Mapping the content space and defining taxonomy requirements
Scheirlinckx, J., Raemdonck, L. V., Abrahams, L., Teixeira, K. C., Alves, G. R. A., Primi, R., John, O. P., & Fruyt, F. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1094888 · Cited by 34
“characterized by respect and support, that is tailored to the (emotional) needs of students (Baumert et al., 2010; Reyes et al., 2012).”
BackgroundShin, D., & Shim, J. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11010018 · Cited by 25
“[13] also revealed that secondary mathematics teachers’ PCK positively affected students’ learning gains.”
BackgroundHankeln, C., & Greefrath, G. (2020) · Journal of mathematics · doi:10.1007/s13138-020-00178-9 · Cited by 14
“Wie die Hattie-Studie (Hattie 2010) sowie die CoActivStudie (z.B. Baumert et al. 2010) zeigen, hat die Lehrkraft durch ihr Wissen, ihr Verhalten und ihre Kompetenzen entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Lernleistung der Schülerinnen und Schüler.”
BackgroundTowards a culturally embedded Financial Mathematics PCK framework
Makonye, J. (2020) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2020.1752788 · Cited by 14
Martindale, N. (2019) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2019.1647092 · Cited by 14
Developing social and decisional capital in US National Blue Ribbon Schools
Visone, J. D. (2018) · doi:10.1177/1365480218755171 · Cited by 14
“Whereas, what teachers know and can do individually is an important element in improving schools (Baumert et al., 2010), it is clearly not enough (Gess-Newsome, 2013; Leana, 2011).”
BackgroundAgathangelou, S. A., Charalambous, C. Y., & Koutselini, M. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.007 · Cited by 14
Helm, C. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s35834-016-0154-3 · Cited by 14
“Empirische Belege für den Effekt des kognitiven Aktivierungspotenzials von Unterricht auf die Schüleroutcomes lassen sich bereits in vielen Studien, u. a. zum Lehrerprofessionswissen, finden (z. B. Baumert et al. 2010; Cauet et al. 2015; Kunter et al. 2005; Lenske et al. 2015; Pauli et al. 2008).”
BackgroundErtle, B. B., Rosenfeld, D., Presser, A. L., & Goldstein, M. (2016) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0785-9 · Cited by 13
A Pedagogical Approach to Engaging Social Work Students in Research
Kranke, D., Brown, J. L. C., Atia, M., & Knotts, G. (2015) · doi:10.1080/02615479.2015.1065810 · Cited by 14
“…to continuous interaction between environmental, behavioral, and cognitive elements (Parcel & Baranowski, 1981), learning gains in mathematics (Baumert et al., 2010), and student motivation to absorb class material being impacted by the instructor’s ability to present desirable outcomes…”
BackgroundWhy “What” Matters: On the Content Dimension of Music Didactics
Georgii-Hemming, E., & Lilliedahl, J. (2014) · doi:10.2979/philmusieducrevi.22.2.132 · Cited by 14
The Development of Attitudes and Emotions Related to Mathematics
Dowker, A., Ashcraft, M. H., & Krinzinger, H. (2012) · Child Development Research · doi:10.1155/2012/238435 · Cited by 19
“Although the terminology used varies [36], the three basic dimensions are (1) classroom management, (2) supportive climate, and (3) cognitive activation.”
BackgroundBarenthien, J. M., Fiebranz, A., Todorova, M., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102186 · Cited by 13
Klieme, E. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44810-3_7 · Cited by 30
Hansen, K. Y., Radišić, J., Liu, X., & Glassow, L. N. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61648-9_5 · Cited by 9
Nilsen, T., Scherer, R., Gustafsson, J., Teig, N., & Kaarstein, H. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61648-9_7 · Cited by 15
“Such teachers may also reduce the achievement gap between students (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFleckenstein, J., Gebauer, S. K., & Möller, J. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.010 · Cited by 14
Rhoads, K., & Weber, K. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.02.006 · Cited by 15
Shirvani, H. (2015) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2015.8110a · Cited by 14
“In a study, researchers (Baumert et al., 2010) evaluated both elementary teachers’ mathematical content knowledge and pedagogy content knowledge on student performance and found pedagogical content knowledge was more predictive of student learning than teachers’ content knowledge level.”
BackgroundKrauskopf, K., Zahn, C., & Hesse, F. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9_3 · Cited by 14
Aydın, B., Fokkema, M., Eryılmaz, N., Muijs, D., Scherer, R., & Pietsch, M. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101521 · Cited by 23
Audisio, A. P., Taylor-Perryman, R., Tasker, T. B., & Steinberg, M. P. (2024) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2024.2361467 · Cited by 23
“Third, components such as learning sessions, coaching, and the cycles of collaborative learning sought not only to increase teachers’ content knowledge but also their pedagogical content knowledge, which is a critical competency for improving student learning (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2008).”
Factors influencing school climate: an empirical study based on the TALIS principal survey
Jiang, X., & Liu, R. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03203-1 · Cited by 13
“Teacher training in the academic track focuses on subject-speci fi c content knowledge and scienti fi c outreach procedures, while teacher training in the nonacademic school track emphasizes a more practical approach with a strong pedagogical orientation (Baumert et al. 2010).”
Gerber, S., Quarder, J., Greefrath, G., & Siller, H.-S. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1141063 · Cited by 13
Vik, F., Nilsen, T., & Øverby, N. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14161-1 · Cited by 13
Is inequitable teacher sorting on the rise? Cross-national evidence from 20 years of TIMSS
Glassow, L. N., & Jerrim, J. (2022) · Large-scale Assessments in Education · doi:10.1186/s40536-022-00125-9 · Cited by 13
“Several studies have mentioned the importance of CK and PCK particularly for mathematics (Baumert et al., 2010; Goe, 2007; Shulman, 1986; Wayne & Youngs, 2003). Some of the strongest evidence comes from Baumert et al (2010) for mathematics, and Sancassani (2021) for science, who employs a within student approach and f…”
BackgroundHwang, S., & Cho, E. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9222956 · Cited by 13
“Moreover, some scholars included curriculum and media [21], math tasks and cognitive demands [22], and context knowledge [23] as components of PCK.”
BackgroundBürger, N., Haselmann, S., Baumgart, J., Prinz, G., Girnat, B., Meisert, A., Menthe, J., Schmidt-Thieme, B., & Wecker, C. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-021-01050-3 · Cited by 25
“Ähnlich wie im COACTIV-Kompetenzmodell besteht eine wesentliche Weiterentwicklung in der Berücksichtigung von Einflussfaktoren auf den Übergang vom potenziellen Können der Lehrkräfte zur Realisierung im Unterricht, die als amplifiers and filters zusammengefasst werden.”
BackgroundInfluentialPomianowicz, K. (2021) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/14749041211039929 · Cited by 17
“Hence, there is no evidence that in countries with a higher tracking degree, the attraction of less qualified teachers or the provision of a less demanding curriculum in lower tracks reduces school performances (Baumert et al., 2010; Brunello and Checchi, 2007), at least when it comes to the influence on immigrant chi…”
BackgroundInfluentialDepping, D., Ehmke, T., & Besser, M. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-021-00994-w · Cited by 13
Marks, G. N. (2020) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2021.1968442 · Cited by 15
“For Germany, Baumert et al. (2012, Table S1) reported correlations around 0.5 for IQ with both reading and mathematics.”
InfluentialDeveloping Assessments of Content Knowledge for Teaching Using Evidence-centered Design
Phelps, G., Gitomer, D., Iaconangelo, C. J., Etkina, E., Seeley, L., & Vokos, S. (2020) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2020.1756256 · Cited by 13
“…developed a framework that in addition to teachers’ deep understanding of mathematics (i.e., CK), included three dimensions of PCK made up of knowledge about multiple solution strategies for a task, student ideas, and representations and explanations (Baumert et al., 2010; Krauss et al., 2008).”
BackgroundTracks as frames of reference for academic self-concept
Dockx, J., Fraine, B. D., & Vandecandelaere, M. (2019) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.006 · Cited by 18
Do Practical and Academic Preparation Paths Lead to Differential Commercial Teacher “Quality”?
Holtsch, D., Hartig, J., & Shavelson, R. (2018) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-018-9208-0 · Cited by 13
“Moreover, these facets directly relate to students’ understanding and learning in the classroom (e.g., Author(s), 2007 – removed for blind review; Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialCaro, D., Kyriakides, L., & Televantou, I. (2017) · Assessment of Reading in International Studies · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2017.1353950 · Cited by 13
“…evidence on teaching effects is at odds with the theory and evidence reported in national longitudinal studies as well as in qualitative research (eg Baumert et al., 2010; Klieme, Pauli, & Reusser, 2009; Kyriakides, Christoforou, & Charalambous, 2013; Muijs et al., 2014; Seidel & Shavelson, 2007).”
ResultKärner, T., & Warwas, J. (2015) · Empirical research in vocational education and training · doi:10.1186/s40461-015-0023-7 · Cited by 16
The Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers
Schwarz, B., & Kaiser, G. (2019) · ICME-13 Monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_15 · Cited by 13
Modeling and Measurement of Teacher Competence: Old Wine in New Skins?
Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (2017) · Technical and vocational education and training · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_41 · Cited by 13
Baumert, J., Becker, M., Neumann, M., & Nikolova, R. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652.a000001 · Cited by 13
Self-citationFranke, U., Backfisch, I., Scherzinger, L., Tolou, A., Thyssen, C., Brahm, T., Rudolf, I., & Lachner, A. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10403-8 · Cited by 14
“…knowledge (PK), which is regarded as generic knowledge for designing meaningful learning environments that support students’ learning processes (Baumert et al., 2010; Voss et al., 2011); and (3) pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), which is knowledge about content-specific teaching and…”
Teaching quality and student reading outcomes: Evidence from a longitudinal study from grade 5 to 7
Attig, M., Hoferichter, F., Steinmann, I., & Strietholt, R. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101347 · Cited by 12
Nührenbörger, M., Wember, F. B., Wollenweber, T., Frischemeier, D., Korten, L., & Selter, C. (2024) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-024-09624-8 · Cited by 17
Fukaya, T., Fukuda, M., & Suzuki, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1276439 · Cited by 27
Gold, B., Thomm, E., & Bauer, J. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12643 · Cited by 12
Brunner, M., Stallasch, S. E., & Lüdtke, O. (2023) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2023.2175753 · Cited by 16
“For example, this kind of benchmark was used to evaluate the impact of teachers ’ pedagogical content knowledge on student learning (Baumert et al., 2010), and to provide context for data on performance gaps in achievement between countries (OECD, 2014, p. 46) and between students with and without…”
MethodSelf-citationDoes Pre-Service Teacher Preparation Affect Students’ Academic Performance? Evidence from China
Liu, X., Gao, W., & Chen, L. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13010069 · Cited by 18
“Meanwhile, the significantly positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on student performance agrees with the findings of relevant research, which confirms the correlation between teacher expertise as well as high-quality teaching and student learning [25].”
BackgroundFischer, J., Machts, N., Bruckermann, T., Møller, J., & Harms, U. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12718 · Cited by 15
Konstantinidou, E., & Kyriakides, L. E. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101144 · Cited by 21
The pedagogical content knowledge of two novice Chinese early childhood EFL teachers
Shi, X.-B., Li, X., & Yeung, S. S. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221094373 · Cited by 14
“For example, several studies that investigated PCK focused on mathematics teachers (Baumert et al., 2010; Hoover, Mosvold, Ball, & Lai, 2016; Tatto et al., 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-180
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2141462352
- Cited by
- 2,100
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 165.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review