The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress
Open accessAbstract
In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Baumert et al. (2010:139) argue that MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and “reflection on classroom experience”.”
From Mentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers (2020) · cites this paper as Baumert et al. (2010:139)
In the citing paper
“Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic (Baumert et al., 2010)”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Baumert et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812
Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory
Warm, T. A. (1989) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294627 · Cited by 1,216
Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312906 · Cited by 1,164 · cited 1×
“…affect students’ learning gains and motivational development (Bransford, Darling-Hammond, & LePage, 2005; Bransford, Derry, Berliner, & Hammerness, 2005; Grossman & McDonald, 2008; Grossman & Schoenfeld, 2005; Hiebert, Morris, Berk, & Jansen, 2007; Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001; Reynolds, 1989).”
Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/428763 · Cited by 902 · cited 13×
“In contrast to Hill and colleagues (Hill et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2007), who conceptualized mathematical knowledge for teaching as an amalgam of the mathematical everyday knowledge that all educated adults should have, a purely mathematical understanding of topics typically taught at school, and mathematical knowled…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCreating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 124
- 10.3102/0013189X07308739 · DOI
- American Council on Education, 1999, To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught
- 10.3102/0162373707313409 · DOI
- 10.1086/461626 · DOI · Paper page
- Ball DL, 1991, Advances in research on teaching: Vol 2 Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, 1
- Ball DL, 2003, Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 3
- Ball DL, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 433
- 10.1111/0161-4681.00046 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · DOI
- Berliner CD, 1994, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, 161
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, 171
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung [Professional competence of student teachers—Knowledge, beliefs, and learning opportunities of mathematics teacher candidates: Initial findings on the effectiveness of teacher training]
- Bollen KA, 1993, Testing structural equation models
- 10.2307/749118 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312026004473 · DOI
- Bransford J, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 1
- Bransford JD, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 40
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Brophy J, 2000, Teaching
- Carstensen CH, 2004, PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs, 371
- Cochran-Smith M, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
- 10.3102/0002831208323280 · DOI
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.76.4.d8277u8778245404 · DOI
- De Corte E, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 491
- 10.1080/00220270701305362 · DOI
- Ditton H, 2007, Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen [Competence building and careers in the education system: Results of a longitudinal study in elementary schools]
- 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193 · DOI
- 10.2307/749384 · DOI
- 10.2307/749215 · DOI
- 10.2307/749875 · DOI
- Fennema E, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
- Floden RE, 2005, Studying teacher education, 261
- 10.3102/00028312032004687 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9 · DOI
- Goe L, 2007, The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis
- 10.3102/01623737022002129 · DOI
- Goodson IF, 1998, Subject knowledge: Readings for the study of school subjects
- Goodson IF, 1996, Studying school subjects
- Greeno JG, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 15
- Grossman PL, 1995, International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 20
- 10.1177/0022487107310748 · DOI
- Grossman PL, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
- Harbison RW, 1992, Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil
- Heaton RM, 2000, Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance
- Heller K, 2000, Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12 + R) [Cognitive Abilities Test for Grades 4 to 12, revision]
- Helmke A, 2009, Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: Diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]
- 10.1177/0022487106295726 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737027002111 · DOI
- 10.3102/0162373707301711 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701487138 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904807307061 · DOI
- Jordan A, 2006, Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematical tasks: Documentation of the task categorization in the COACTIV study]
- 10.1023/A:1025175812582 · DOI
- Krauss S, 2008, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 873
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
- Kunter M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 161
- Kunter M, 2009, Lehrprofessionalität—Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, 153
- Kunter M, 2007, Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme, 32
- Lanahan L, 2005, Fundamental problems in the measurement of instructional processes: Estimating reasonable effect sizes and conceptualizing what is important to measure
- Leinhardt G, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 333
- 10.1177/0022487108315581 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410602589 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312038002321 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
- Mewborn D, 2003, A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 45
- Mitchell R, 1999, Thinking K–16, 3, 1
- 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/447369 · DOI
- Munby H, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 877
- Muthén LK, 2004, Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- 10.3102/00028312037001123 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737026003237 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004, Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003
- 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063002167 · DOI
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [PISA 2003: Studies on competence development over a school year]
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 29
- 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/461723 · DOI
- Reynolds MC, 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
- 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2673267 · DOI
- Scheerens J, 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
- 10.1080/15366360701487021 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701486965 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt WH, 2007, The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. Mathematics teaching in the 21st century (MT21)
- 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701492880 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00035-8 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654307310317 · DOI
- Sfard A, 2003, A research companion for NCTM standards, 353
- Shavelson RJ, 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer, 1
- Sherin MG, 1996, The nature and dynamics of teachers’ content knowledge
- Shuell T, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 726
- Shulman LS, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 399
- 10.2307/749346 · DOI
- 10.1080/03057640701372426 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312027004639 · DOI
- 10.1080/002202797183928 · DOI
- Stigler J, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
- 10.3102/00028312032002227 · DOI
- 10.2307/749683 · DOI
- 10.2307/749194 · DOI
- 10.2307/749339 · DOI
- Tymms P, 2004, But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research, 55
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation, 2003, Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 2006, The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom
- Vosniadou S, 2005, Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, 55
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.014 · DOI
- Walberg HJ, 2000, Effective educational practices
- 10.3102/0034654308320292 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063003249 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543073001089 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson SM, 2003, Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions
- Winship C, 2007, Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research
- Wu ML, 1997, ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software manual
- Zeichner KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 645
- Zumwalt KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,003
König, J. A., & Lee, J. (2015) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2014.991178 · Cited by 43
“For the majority of relevant studies, however, the classical paper-and-pencil assessment represents the dominating paradigm (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2008; König & Seifert, 2012; Tatto et al., 2012) not least because it enables an efficient and reliable way to measure…”
BackgroundKessels, U., & Taconis, R. (2012) · doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9230-9 · Cited by 43
“Research from psychology (Baldwin and Baldwin 1973; Bandura 1977; Gerrig and Zimbardo 2001) has shown that the behaviour of a modelling person is likely to be imitated if a) it is perceived that the behavior has reinforcing consequences for the modeling person, b) the model is perceived as being positive, popular and…”
BackgroundTeig, N., & Nilsen, T. (2022) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170 · Cited by 43
Blonder, R., Feldman-Maggor, Y., & Rap, S. (2024) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10180-2 · Cited by 68
“PCK emerged as a particularly valuable construct for science teachers due to its capability to characterize specialized teachers’ professional knowledge and skills and predict effective teaching (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill & Chin, 2018; Kirschner et al., 2016).”
Tengberg, M., Blikstad‐Balas, M., & Roe, A. (2022) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103698 · Cited by 57
Conceptualizing and exploring the quality of teaching using generic frameworks: A way forward
Panayiotou, A., Herbert, B., Sammons, P., & Kyriakides, L. E. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101028 · Cited by 49
Leuchter, M., Saalbach, H., Studhalter, U., & Tettenborn, A. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1805137 · Cited by 50
Todorova, M., Sunder, C., Steffensky, M., & Möller, K. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.016 · Cited by 56
“Research on teaching competence provides insights into teachers' professional knowledge as one of the most important cognitive dispositions that impacts teaching quality and student learning (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005).”
BackgroundPark, S., Suh, J., & Seo, K. (2017) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9578-y · Cited by 42
“This notion is grounded in empirical evidence that supports the positive relationship between teacher quality and student success in learning (Baumert et al. 2010; Calderhead 1996; Hill et al. 2005; Sanders 2000).”
BackgroundEkstam, U., Korhonen, J., Linnanmäki, K., & Pirjo Aunio, A. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.009 · Cited by 50
Qian, H., & Youngs, P. A. (2016) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-014-9297-0 · Cited by 42
“For example, teachers’ knowledge influences the mathematics achievement of their students (Baumert et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2005).”
BackgroundInvestigating the Knowledge Needed for Teaching Mathematics
Charalambous, C. (2016) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487116634168 · Cited by 42
“…approaches have been pursued, ranging from exploring associations of teacher knowledge to the quality of instruction and/or student learning (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Blunk, et al., 2008; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005; Kersting, Givvin, Thompson, Santagata, & Stigler, 2012; Shecthman,…”
Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching the Function Concept and Student Learning Outcomes
Hatısaru, V., & Erbaş, A. K. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9707-5 · Cited by 59
“Since these representations play an important role inmathematical understanding (Baumert et al., 2010). as part of SCK, teachers should be familiar with them and translate and form linkages among them (Even, 1993).”
BackgroundInfluentialTeacher-Based Scaffolding as a Teacher Professional Development Program in Indonesia.
Rahman, B., Abdurrahman, A., Kadaryanto, B., & Rusminto, N. E. (2015) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.4 · Cited by 42
“Therefore, there was a strong rationale for educational researchers and practitioners to formulate programs to assist teachers to improve their CK (Ball, et.al, 2008; Baumert et al., 2010; Houseal, et al., 2014; Duschl, et.al., 2007).”
BackgroundYeter, I. H., Yang, W., & Sturgess, J. B. (2024) · Future in Educational Research · doi:10.1002/fer3.59 · Cited by 55
Mathematics in mathematics education
Adler, J. (2017) · doi:10.17159/sajs.2017/a0201 · Cited by 41
Kuhn, C., Alonzo, A. C., & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2016) · Empirical research in vocational education and training · doi:10.1186/s40461-016-0031-2 · Cited by 41
“2012), which will affect instructional quality and, ultimately, student achievement (Baumert et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2005).”
BackgroundLohse-Bossenz, H., Kunina‐Habenicht, O., & Kunter, M. (2013) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0181-6 · Cited by 55
Self-citationZuo, S., Huang, Q., & Qi, C. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06700-3 · Cited by 41
“In conclusion, the accumulated body of evidence from diverse research endeavors affirms that cognitive activation strategies play a pivotal role in fostering positive outcomes in students’ mathematics achievement (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010 ; Jasmin et al., 2017 ; Keller et al., 2017 ).”
Copur-Gencturk, Y., Li, J.-X., Cohen, A. S., & Orrill, C. (2023) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104963 · Cited by 40
Which is more predictive: Domain‐ or task‐specific self‐efficacy in teaching and outcomes?
Lu, H., Chen, X., & Qi, C. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12554 · Cited by 43
Problem-Based Learning Strategies and Critical Thinking Skills Among Pre-Service Teachers
Benedicto, P. N., & Andrade, R. (2022) · International Journal of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics · doi:10.53378/352885 · Cited by 50
“The discovery of various solutions is part of pedagogical awareness of material, a significant indicator of students' academic achievements in mathematics (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHeikonen, L., Pietarinen, J., Toom, A., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2020) · Learning Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/23735082.2020.1725603 · Cited by 51
Do pupils from low-income families get low-quality teachers? Indirect evidence from English schools
Allen, R., & Sims, S. (2018) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1421152 · Cited by 40
“Since then a number of studies have replicated this finding using different datasets (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Charalambous, & Chin, 2015; Kane et al., 2008).”
ResultAn, S. A. (2017) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0821-9 · Cited by 40
“Their teachers’ pedagogical ability has been repeatedly identified as the essential factor for impacting students’ learning outcomes and motivational levels (Baumert et al. 2010; Hattie 2009).”
BackgroundKönig, J., & Klemenz, S. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-015-0623-9 · Cited by 36
Ngware, M. W., Ciera, J., Musyoka, P. K., & Oketch, M. (2015) · doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9594-2 · Cited by 40
“…for the related student, teacher, and school characteristics described in the literature as influencing student achievement (Akiba et al., 2007; Baumert et al., 2010; Carnoy et al., 2008; Georges et al., 2010; Gillies & Collins, 2008; Goldschmidt & Phelps, 2010; Hattie, 2009; Hungi & Thuku,…”
InfluentialMcElvany, N., Schroeder, S., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., Horz, H., & Ullrich, M. (2011) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0078-1 · Cited by 37
Self-citationThe effects of teacher mathematics knowledge and pedagogy on student achievement in rural Guatemala
Marshall, J. H., & Sorto, M. (2012) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-012-9276-6 · Cited by 40
“The studies by Hill et al. (2005) and Baumert et al. (2010) make a convincing case that the teacher’s mathematics knowledge matters; but there is still the need to identify the pedagogical mechanisms by which this knowledge is transferred to specific teaching moments.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNeubrand, M., Jordan, A., Krauss, S., Blum, W., & Löwen, K. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_7 · Cited by 40
Self-citationAssessing the Level of Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Moh'd, S. S., Uwamahoro, J., Joachim, N., & Orodho, J. (2021) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/10883 · Cited by 39
“Baumert et al. (2010) observed a positive relationship between teachers’ PCK and instructional quality.”
BackgroundSantagata, R., & Lee, J. (2019) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-019-09447-y · Cited by 39
Rieser, S., Naumann, A., Decristan, J., Fauth, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12121 · Cited by 39
“high level of cognitive activation also show higher achievement gains (Baumert et al., 2010; Fauth, Decristan, Rieser, Klieme, & Büttner, 2014b; Mashburn et al., 2008).”
BackgroundConceptual Framework and Methodology of This Report
Nilsen, T., Gustafsson, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016) · IEA research for education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8_1 · Cited by 63
“In other lines of research, teacher knowledge and skills, such as pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge, are measured directly (see Baumert et al. 2010), but this is not possible to implement in large-scale international studies, unless this is the aim of the study, as was the case…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHill, H. C., Blazar, D., & Lynch, K. (2015) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858415617703 · Cited by 64
“Related studies have found that teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010), content knowledge for teaching (Hill et al., 2005), knowledge of student errors and misconceptions (Sadler, Sonnert, Coyle, CookSmith, & Miller, 2013), high-fidelity enactment of standards-based…”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, X., Hansen, K. Y., Valcke, M., & Neve, J. D. (2024) · ZDM: Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s11858-024-01630-7 · Cited by 38
“Tailoring educational experiences to meet the diverse needs of students ensures equitable access to quality education (Baumert et al., 2010).”
Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Franke, U. (2024) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v12i1.1179 · Cited by 61
“TPACK is rooted in general frameworks, such as the one by Shulman (1986), who proposed three knowledge components for professional teaching (see also Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2005; Kunter et al., 2013 for empirical applications): a) content knowledge (CK) constitutes teachers’…”
BackgroundInfluentialKönig, J. A., Heine, S., Kramer, C., Weyers, J., Becker-Mrotzek, M., Großschedl, J., Hanisch, C., Hanke, P., Hennemann, T., Jost, J., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2023.2268702 · Cited by 38
“By contrast, study designs that link directly assessed teacher knowledge to processes of instructional quality and student achievement data potentially allow more substantial and precise correlations (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; Blömeke et al., 2022).”
InfluentialZaragoza, A., Seidel, T., & Santagata, R. (2023) · The Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2023.2182650 · Cited by 38
“…of knowledge about principles of teaching and learning (Hiebert et al., 2007; Santagata et al., 2018; Seidel & Stürmer, 2014), an aspect of general pedagogical knowledge (Hammerness et al., 2002; Voss et al., 2011) and pedagogical content knowledge (e.g. for mathematics, Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundClassroom management of pre-service and beginning teachers: From dispositions to performance
Junker, R., Gold, B., & Holodynski, M. (2021) · International Journal of Modern Education Studies · doi:10.51383/ijonmes.2021.137 · Cited by 45
“Although there are other important aspects of teaching quality, such as supportive climate or instructional support (Baumert et al., 2010; Hamre et al., 2013; Kunter & Voss, 2013; Lipowsky et al., 2009), classroom management is also a prerequisite for other quality indices (Emmer & Stough, 2001;…”
BackgroundFülöp, É. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2020.1869070 · Cited by 38
“In a study involving teachers with significantly different experience, the results of a teaching intervention are difficult to separate from teacher effects (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundReynolds, W. M., & Park, S. (2020) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21676 · Cited by 66
Conceptualizations of professional knowledge for teachers of mathematics
Neubrand, M. (2018) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0906-0 · Cited by 38
Self-citationLohse-Bossenz, H., Kunina‐Habenicht, O., Dicke, T., Leutner, D., & Kunter, M. (2015) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.01.001 · Cited by 40
Self-citationUsing Vignette Testing to Measure Student Science Teachers’ Professional Competencies
Brovelli, D., Bölsterli, K., Rehm, M., & Wilhelm, M. (2014) · doi:10.12691/education-2-7-20 · Cited by 38
“[1] also consider selfregulation (SR), beliefs and motivational orientations in their study on teacher competence for mathematics instruction.”
BackgroundWu, Y.-J., & Becker, M. (2023) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-022-01727-w · Cited by 44
“Ability grouping has been implemented in secondary schools worldwide, and uses students’ academic abilities to assign them to different learning environments (Baumert et al., 2010; Schofield, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialVideo Analysis As A Tool For Understanding Science Instruction
Fischer, H. E., & Neumann, K. (2012) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_6 · Cited by 50
Hidayat, R., Zainuddin, Z., & Mazlan, N. H. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104432 · Cited by 36
“This finding is consistent with previous research in this field (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultIntegrating a movement-based learning platform as core curriculum tool in kindergarten classrooms
Aloizou, V., Linardatou, S., Boloudakis, M., & Retalis, S. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13511 · Cited by 36
König, J. A., Hanke, P., Glutsch, N., Jäger-Biela, D. J., Pohl, T., Becker-Mrotzek, M., Schabmann, A., & Waschewski, T. (2022) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-022-09393-z · Cited by 36
“In the 1980s, Shulman (1987) developed a classification of professional teacher knowledge components, referred to by many empirical researchers when distinguishing between content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) (see, e.g., König et al., 2016; Baumert et al.…”
BackgroundFraming a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teachers
Weiland, T., Orrill, C., Nagar, G. G., Brown, R., & Burke, J. (2021) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0 · Cited by 36
Teacher Role Breadth and its Relationship to Student-Reported Teacher Support
Phillippo, K. L., & Stone, S. I. (2013) · The High School journal/The High school journal · doi:10.1353/hsj.2013.0016 · Cited by 37
“These characteristics include instructional approach (Baumert et al., 2010; Desimone & Long, 2010; Palardy & Rumberger, 2008; Rowan, Correnti, & Miller, 2002), teacher certification (including national board certification) (Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor, 2007; Goldhaber & Anthony, 2007), teacher experience (Clotfelter et…”
Senden, B., Nilsen, T., & Teig, N. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101274 · Cited by 53
Özdemir, N., Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Turan, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2023) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x231159092 · Cited by 59
“…Practices Scholars have long endeavored to delineate the nature and content of instructional practices that best predict student learning outcomes (Baumert et al., 2010; Darling-Hammond, 2000; Decristan et al., 2015; Hospel & Galand, 2016; Kane & Cantrell, 2010; Marzano et al., 2001; Rjosk et…”
BackgroundNeed for Cognition and its relation to academic achievement in different learning environments
Colling, J., Wollschläger, R., Keller, U., Preckel, F., & Fischbach, A. (2022) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102110 · Cited by 41
Voss, T., & Wittwer, J. (2020) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-020-00088-2 · Cited by 70
Self-citationNückles, M. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09567-5 · Cited by 47
Pinger, P., Rakoczy, K., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2017) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-017-9240-2 · Cited by 40
“Assessment tasks can be challenging, activate students’ prior knowledge and engage students in constructive learning processes and therefore make a contribution to cognitively activating instruction (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; 7 Klieme et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe Instructional Quality Assessment as a tool for reflecting on instructional practice
Boston, M. D., & Candela, A. G. (2018) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0916-6 · Cited by 51
“Often, implementing a mathematical task in ways that maintain the cognitive demands is one of the more difficult aspects of ambitious teaching (Baumert et al. 2010; Stigler and Hiebert 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialKönig, J. A., Tachtsoglou, S., Lammerding, S., Strauß, S., Nold, G., & Rohde, A. (2017) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12383 · Cited by 35
Steffensky, M., Gold, B., Holdynski, M., & Möller, K. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9627-4 · Cited by 41
Norwegian prospective teachers’ MKT when interpreting pupils’ productions on a fraction task
Jakobsen, A., Ribeiro, C., & Mellone, M. (2014) · NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education · doi:10.7146/nomad.v19i3-4.148652 · Cited by 35
“…(Rowland, Huckstep & Thwaites, 2005); Knowledge for teaching (Davis & Simmt, 2006); conceptualizations focusing on Pedagogical content knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010); Mathematical knowledge for teaching (Ball et al., 2008); and Mathematics teachers’ specialised knowledge (Carrillo, Climent,…”
Jacob, B., Frenzel, A., & Stephens, E. J. (2017) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0848-6 · Cited by 35
Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015) · Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik · doi:10.1007/s13138-014-0068-3 · Cited by 34
Lazarides, R., & Ittel, A. (2012) · Child Development Research · doi:10.1155/2012/813920 · Cited by 34
“Although the terminology used varies [36], the three basic dimensions are (1) classroom management, (2) supportive climate, and (3) cognitive activation.”
BackgroundFachdidaktisches Wissen von Lehrkräften und multiple Ziele im naturwissenschaftlichen Sachunterricht
Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., & Möller, K. (2012) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0258-z · Cited by 33
“Mit Baumert et al. (2010) und kunter und Voss (2011) ist anzunehmen, dass die hier berichteten effekte über die Inszenierung kognitiv aktivierender und konstruktiv unterstützender Lernumgebungen vermittelt werden.”
BackgroundInfluentialTeacher Knowledge Experiment: Conditions of the Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Heinze, A., Bernholt, A., Rink, R., & Kunter, M. (2017) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_8 · Cited by 34
Self-citationProfessional competence of mathematics teachers in dealing with tasks in lesson planning
Hammer, S., & Ufer, S. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104246 · Cited by 33
Using an extended ICAP-based coding guide as a framework for the analysis of classroom observations
Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M. J., Bodner, E., Stephenson, H., Jeffries, D., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104133 · Cited by 33
“Drawing on prior research such as that of De Corte, Verschaffel, and Masui (2004), Baumert et al. (2010), and Vosniadou, Ioannides, Dimitrakopoulou, and Papademetriou (2001), Dignath and Veenman (2021) describe environments as constructivist when teachers prompt students to associate new…”
BackgroundMethodHachfeld, A., & Lazarides, R. (2020) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-020-00501-5 · Cited by 45
Appova, A., & Taylor, C. (2019) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-017-9385-z · Cited by 33
Hilton, J., Larsen, R., Wiley, D., & Fischer, L. (2019) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2019.1573150 · Cited by 33
“(p. 239) Baumert et al. (2010) show that teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge influenced the cognitive level of tasks with significant impact on pupil attainment in mathematics – this is something that the present study does not account for.”
BackgroundInfluentialResearch Methods in Mathematics Teacher Education
Gellert, U., Hernández, R. B., & Chapman, O. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_11 · Cited by 35
Schulz, A. (2023) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7 · Cited by 32
“Assessment tasks can point to aspects of teacher content knowledge that need to be acquired as part of professional preparation (Ball et al., 2008; Baumert et al., 2010; Döhr-mann, Kaiser, & Blömeke, 2014; Phelps et al., 2020).”
Ernst, H. M., Wittwer, J., & Voss, T. (2023) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3860 · Cited by 45
Self-citationNickl, M., Huber, S. A., Sommerhoff, D., Codreanu, E., Ufer, S., & Seidel, T. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00351-9 · Cited by 64
“Professional knowledge has been shown to be highly predictive of instructional quality as well as student learning outcomes (Baumert et al., 2010; Kunter et al., 2011, 2013).”
BackgroundOut-of-Field Teaching in Science: An Overlooked Problem
Luft, J. A., Hanuscin, D. L., Hobbs, L., & Törner, G. (2020) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1046560x.2020.1814052 · Cited by 32
Doyle, A., Seery, N., Gumaelius, L., Canty, D., & Hartell, E. (2018) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1 · Cited by 32
“2017) and mathematics (Baumert et al. 2010) education to explore the relationship between PCK and practice.”
BackgroundTeachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics achievement of students in Peru
Cueto, S., León, J., Sorto, M. A., & Miranda, A. (2016) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-016-9735-2 · Cited by 53
“Baumert et al. (2010) found that ameasure ofPCKis a significant predictor of studentmathematics learninggains in Germansecondaryschools; furthermore, they found that empirically theycoulddifferentiate teachers’ knowledge of subject matter from PCK, with the latter having a stronger weight in predicting achievement. It…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHollenstein, L., & Brühwiler, C. (2024) · The Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2024.2328042 · Cited by 31
“…of teacher professional competences according to Blömeke et al. (2015) focusing on GPK. Teachers’ professional knowledge is considered to be an essential prerequisite for planning challenging, varied and motivating learning opportunities, as well as for student outcomes (Baumert et al., 2010).”
U.S. Every Student Succeeds Act: Negative Impacts on Teaching Out-of-Field
Overschelde, J. P. V., & Piatt, A. (2020) · Research in Educational Policy and Management · doi:10.46303/repam.02.01.1 · Cited by 31
“…certification in the subjects they are teaching (i.e., teaching out-of-field), they often lack the requisite pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and engage in lower quality instruction (Baumert et al., 2010; Hashweh, 1987; Hobbs, 2013; Ingersoll, 1999; Jones & Carter, 2007; Sanders et al., 1993).”
BackgroundLe, H. T. T., Nguyen, H. T. T., La, T. P., Le, T. T. T., Nguyen, N. T., Nguyen, T. P. T., & Tran, T. (2020) · International Journal of Education and Practice · doi:10.18488/journal.61.2020.82.221.232 · Cited by 31
“In the literature, many authors (such as Baumert et al. (2010); Akanni and Oduaran (2018); Bruffaerts et al. (2018); Chalapati et al. (2018); Keller et al. (2017); Mortenson (2006)) relate lecturers’ pedagogical competencies to students’ motivation for learning, claiming that this is the key to…”
BackgroundManipulatives in Mathematics Education
Bartolini, M., & Martignone, F. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_93 · Cited by 31
Demonty, I., Vlassis, J., & Fagnant, A. (2018) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-018-9820-9 · Cited by 31
“A number of authors have therefore pointed to the need to narrow down the scope of studies in order to analyse the situation in relation to more limited fields of mathematics (Baumert et al., 2010; Depaepe et al., 2015; Hill, Sleep, Lewis, & Ball, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe knowledge-based reasoning of physical education teachers
Reuker, S. (2017) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x15624245 · Cited by 31
“The distinction between pedagogical and subject-matter knowledge is in line with findings that confirm the distinguishability of these two types of knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010; Kleickmann et al., 2013; Krauss et al., 2008).”
ResultNixon, R. S., Campbell, B. K., & Luft, J. A. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1204482 · Cited by 31
“This support is important because SMK is the foundation for the development of PCK and thus influences their instruction (van Driel et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialGrasby, K., Coventry, W., Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., & Medland, S. (2016) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-016-9797-z · Cited by 31
“There is evidence that a teacher’s pedagogical math knowledge accounts for some of the variance in students’ mathematical achievement (Baumert et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2008).”
Lowrie, T., & Jorgensen, R. (2015) · Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/teamat/hrv008 · Cited by 31
TELPS: A method for analysing mathematics pre-service teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Prescott, A. E., Bausch, I., & Bruder, R. (2013) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.002 · Cited by 31
Beliefs and beyond: affect and the teaching and learning of mathematics
Roesken, B., Pepin, B., & Toerner, G. (2011) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0354-1 · Cited by 27
“Selected studies have investigated the role of teacher behavior in the mathematics classroom discussing teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and to a lesser extent teacher ‘instructional goals’ (e.g., Sowder, 2007; Philipp, 2007; Baumert et al., 2010; Roesken, 2011).”
Methlagl, M. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100137 · Cited by 31
Voss, T., Zachrich, L., Fauth, B., & Wittwer, J. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101614 · Cited by 42
Self-citationFostering Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Regarding Digital Media
Große-Heilmann, R., Riese, J., Burde, J., Schubatzky, T., & Weiler, D. (2022) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12070440 · Cited by 30
“[10,15–17].”
Kulgemeyer, C., Kempin, M., Weißbach, A., Borowski, A., Buschhüter, D., Enkrott, P., Reinhold, P., Riese, J., Schecker, H., Schröder, J., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.2006820 · Cited by 30
“However, there is no detailed understanding of how CK, PCK, and PK impact teachers’ actions in physics (Cauet et al., 2015; Kulgemeyer & Riese, 2018; Keller et al., 2016), even though promising results come from other disciplines like mathematics (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe association between cognitive activation and mathematics achievement: a multiple mediation model
Zhang, D., Wang, C., & Yang, Y. (2021) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2021.1917520 · Cited by 33
“Some studies also have found that cognitive activation strategies enhance mathematics achievement in academic assessments (Baumert et al., 2010; Lipowsky et al., 2009; Yi & Lee, 2017).”
BackgroundResultKearney, W. S., & Garfield, T. A. (2019) · RMLE Online · doi:10.1080/19404476.2019.1607138 · Cited by 45
“Naturally, teachers’ professional competence has a demonstrable effect on student ability to learn (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFischer, J., Praetorius, A., & Klieme, E. (2019) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-019-09295-7 · Cited by 43
Elementary teachers’ science subject matter knowledge across the teacher career cycle
Nixon, R. S., Smith, L., & Sudweeks, R. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21524 · Cited by 30
Leistungstests zur Messung der professionellen Kompetenz frühpädagogischer Fachkräfte
Blömeke, S., Jenßen, L., Dunekacke, S., Suhl, U., Grassmann, M., & Wedekind, H. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000159 · Cited by 30
Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching: a longitudinal study using two measures
Copur‐Gencturk, Y., & Lubienski, S. T. (2012) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9233-0 · Cited by 27
“More recently, Baumert et al. (2010) used a measure of German high school teachers’ pedagogical and common content knowledge, and they found both were significant predictors of the quality of instruction and student performance.”
MethodResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-180
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2141462352
- Cited by
- 2,100
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 165.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review