Cited by 198Reading and Literacy DevelopmentTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Assessment and Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher Study Group: Impact of the Professional Development Model on Reading Instruction and Student Outcomes in First Grade Classrooms

Open access

Abstract

Randomized field trials were used to examine the impact of the Teacher Study Group (TSG), a professional development model, on first grade teachers’ reading comprehension and vocabulary instruction, their knowledge of these areas, and the comprehension and vocabulary achievement of their students. The multisite study was conducted in three large urban school districts from three states. A total of 81 first grade teachers and their 468 students from 19 Reading First schools formed the analytic sample in the study. Classroom observations of teaching practice showed significant improvements in TSG schools. TSG teachers also significantly outperformed control teachers on the teacher knowledge measure of vocabulary instruction. Confirmatory analysis of student outcomes indicated marginally significant effects in oral vocabulary.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0002831209361208

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Adams M. J., 2000, Open court reading
  2. Bereiter C., 2002, Open court reading
  3. Calkins L. M., 2003, Launching the writing workshop
  4. Carlisle J., 2002, Improving reading comprehension: Research-based principles and practices
  5. Elmore R. F., 2002, Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: Report on the imperative for professional development in education
  6. Gersten R., 2007, Educational interventions for struggling readers, 381
  7. Gersten R., 1992, Higher cognitive functioning for all students, 201
  8. Goldenberg C., 1991, Educational Leadership, 49, 69
  9. Guskey T. R., 1997, Journal of Staff Development, 18, 36
  10. Haager D., 2008, The California reading first year 6 evaluation report
  11. Harcourt School Publishers, 2005, Harcourt Trophies
  12. Holland H., 2005, American Educational Research Association: Research Points, 3, 1
  13. Kennedy M. M., 1991, Follow through: Program and policy issues, 57
  14. Lieberman A., 1992, Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 673
  15. Lortie D., 1975, Schoolteacher: A sociological study
  16. McLaughlin M. W., 1994, Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change, 31
  17. Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory
  18. Pressley M., 2002, Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching
  19. Pressley M., 1998, Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching, 192
  20. Raphael T. E., 1986, Reading Teacher, 39, 516
  21. Saunders B., 2001, Reconceptualizing literacy in the new age of pluralism and multiculturalism, 289
  22. Showers B., 1987, Educational Leadership, 45, 77
  23. Taylor B., Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association
  24. Thompson S. C., 2004, Research in Middle Level Education Online, 28, 1
  25. 10.3102/01623737017003355 · DOI
  26. Wright Group, 1996, Sunshine reading program

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Jayanthi, M., Kim, J. S., & Santoro, L. E.
Affiliations
  • Instructional Research Group (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2010-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
694-739
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W2171017027
Cited by
198
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
teacher study groups, professional development, first grade teachers, reading comprehension instruction, vocabulary teaching, teacher knowledge, academic performance, oral vocabulary, Reading First, urban schools, teaching practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review