The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education
Abstract
In physical education, the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) pedagogical strategy has attracted significant attention from theoreticians and educators for allowing the development of game education through a tactic-to-skill approach involving the use of modified games. However, some have proposed that as an educational framework, it lacks adequate theoretical grounding from a motor learning perspective to empirically augment its perceived effectiveness. The authors examine the literature base providing the theoretical underpinning for TGfU and explore the potential of a nonlinear pedagogical framework, based on dynamical systems theory, as a suitable explanation for TGfU’s effectiveness in physical education. Nonlinear pedagogy involves manipulating key task constraints on learners to facilitate the emergence of functional movement patterns and decision-making behaviors. The authors explain how interpreting motor learning processes from a nonlinear pedagogical framework can underpin the educational principles of TGfU and provide a theoretical rationale for guiding the implementation of learning progressions in physical education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Task simplification maintains relevant information-movement couplings and constraint interactions while blocking degrees of freedom to meet the athlete's skill level.
“This approach of using “scaled-down versions of tasks [that] are created in practice and performed by learners” (Chow et al., 2007, p. 270) aims at maintaining relevant information-movement couplings and constraint interactions, while blocking degrees of freedom in order to meet the athlete's skill level (Davids et al., 2008; Correia et al., 2019).”
From Skill Training Periodization in “Specialist” Sports Coaching—An Introduction of the “PoST” Framework for Skill Development (2019) · cites this paper as Chow et al., 2007
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935 · see citing works
“Constraints on the development of coordination,”
Newell, K. M. (1986) · Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196276 · Cited by 829 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These ideas on augmented feedback have received some support from work by Wulf and Shea (2002), who observed that an external focus that directed performers’ attention toward the movement effects, rather than to other external sources of information, yielded better learning and performance of a…”
ResultGoverning coordination: behavioural principles and neural correlates
Carson, R. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1726-8 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.33.1.146 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: a clarification
Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationOtte, F. W., Millar, S.-K., & Klatt, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2019.00061 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
DelCastillo-Andrés, Ó., Toronjo-Hornillo, L., & Toronjo-Urquiza, L. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16214078 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Australian Institute of Sport
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (PT)
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-278
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W1741291520
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
- Faculty of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research
- Keywords
- Teaching Games for Understanding, nonlinear pedagogy, dynamical systems theory, motor learning, game education, modified games, task constraints, learning progression, physical education pedagogy, decision-making in sport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review