Cited by 4Schizophrenia research and treatmentTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Enhancement of Function of the Prefrontal Cortex to Improve Symptoms of Schizophrenia

Open access
Sarma Bardoloi, Prajjita·2020·Acta Scientific Neurology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31080/asne.2020.03.0183

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A case report suggests guanfacine may be especially helpful in young adults with schizophrenia and a childhood history of abuse, and can improve insight.

    “a case report by Bardoloi (2020) suggests that guanfacine may be especially helpful in young adults with schizophrenia and a childhood history of abuse, and that it can improve insight”

    From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Bardoloi (2020)

    The Clinical history says the patient had no history of emotional or physical abuse, contrary to the claimed childhood-abuse history. The Conclusion does report improved insight after guanfacine was added, but this case cannot support the claim about young adults with schizophrenia and a history of abuse. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lewis DA and Lieberman JA. "Catching up on schizophrenia: Natural history and neurobiology". Neuron 28.2 (2000): 325- 334.
  2. Wang M., et al. "α2A-adrenoceptors strengthen working memory networks by inhibiting cAMP-HCN channel signaling in prefrontal cortex". Cell 129.2 (2007): 397-410.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarma Bardoloi, P.
Venue
Acta Scientific Neurology
Published
2020-04-28
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
19-23
ISSN
2582-1121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021581771
Cited by
4
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Scientific Neurology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, schizophrenia, symptom improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review