Cited by 110Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsStudent Assessment and Feedback

What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research

Driessen, Erik, Scheele, Fedde·2013·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Workplace-based assessment is more commonly given a lukewarm than a warm welcome by its prospective users. In this article, we summarise the workplace-based assessment literature as well as our own experiences with workplace-based assessment to derive lessons that can facilitate acceptance of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate specialty training. We propose to shift the emphasis in workplace-based assessment from assessment of trainee performance to the learning of trainees. Workplace-based assessment should focus on supporting supervisors in taking entrustment decisions by complementing their "gut feeling" with information from assessments and focus less on assessment and testability. One of the most stubborn problems with workplace-based assessment is the absence of observation of trainees and the lack of feedback based on observations. Non-standardised observations are used to organise feedback. To make these assessments meaningful for learning, it is essential that they are not perceived as summative by their users, that they provide narrative feedback for the learner and that there is a form of facilitation that helps to integrate the feedback in trainees' self-assessments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2013.798403

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grades have the potential to demotivate or to reduce effort.

    “Because of the potential for grades to demotivate or to reduce effort, it has been suggested that it might be wisest to avoid giving grades except when formally assessing the learner (in infrequent ‘high stakes’ assessments) [58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driessen, E., & Scheele, F.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital (NL)
Corresponding author
Driessen, Erik
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2013-05-23
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
569-574
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2170153256
Cited by
110
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
workplace-based assessment, graduate medical education, specialist training, entrustment decisions, trainee learning, clinical supervision, narrative feedback, summative assessment, self-assessment
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Humans, Internship and Residency, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review