Cited by 79Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education

Open access
Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K., Schuwirth, Lambert W. T., Braat, Didi D. M., Teunissen, Pim W., Scheele, Fedde·2013·Medical Teacher

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent changes in postgraduate medical training curricula usually encompass a shift towards more formative assessment, or assessment for learning. However, though theoretically well suited to postgraduate training, evidence is emerging that engaging in formative assessment in daily clinical practice is complex. AIM: We aimed to explore trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of what factors determine active engagement in formative assessment. METHODS: Focus group study with postgraduate trainees and supervisors in obstetrics and gynaecology. RESULTS: Three higher order themes emerged: individual perspectives on feedback, supportiveness of the learning environment and the credibility of feedback and/or feedback giver. CONCLUSION: Engaging in formative assessment with a genuine impact on learning is complex and quite a challenge to both trainees and supervisors. Individual perspectives on feedback, a supportive learning environment and credibility of feedback are all important in this process. Every one of these should be taken into account when the utility of formative assessment in postgraduate medical training is evaluated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2012.756576

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Segers M, Dochy F, Cascallar E. 2003. Students' perceptions about new modes of assessment in higher education: A review. In: Gijselaers WH, Wilkerson LA, Boshuizen HPA, editors. Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. The Netherlands: Springer. pp 331-347.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dijksterhuis, M. G. K., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Braat, D. D. M., Teunissen, P. W., & Scheele, F.
Affiliations
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • University of Medical Centre Nijmegen
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2013-04-22
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
e1396-402
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2093342083
Cited by
79
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
assessment for learning, formative assessment, graduate medical education, trainee perceptions, supervisor perceptions, feedback, learning environment, obstetrics and gynecology education
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Environment, Faculty, Medical, Feedback, Goals, Humans, Internship and Residency, Learning, Perception, Program Evaluation, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review