Cited by 30Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryExtracellular vesicles in disease

Development of an in vitro tumor spheroid culture model amenable to high-throughput testing of potential anticancer nanotherapeutics

Solomon, Melani A., Lemera, Jenkins, D’Souza, Gerard G. M.·2016·Journal of Liposome Research

Abstract

CONTEXT: Three-dimensional tumor spheroid cultures are a better representative of in vivo solid tumors than monolayer cultures and should be used for testing potential nanotherapeutics in vitro. OBJECTIVE: To develop techniques to test the disposition and efficacy of nanocarrier formulations in spheroids in a cost-effective manner amenable to high-throughput testing. METHODS: Spheroids were obtained using a modified liquid overlay technique in a 96-well plate. Several nanocarrier formulations were prepared and tested in the spheroid model. The disposition of the formulations in the spheroids was determined by confocal microscopy while the effect of the drug-loaded formulations was assessed in terms of the cell viability, loss of membrane integrity, induction of caspases and inhibition of growth of the spheroids. RESULTS: The surface charge of the formulations influenced the accumulation of the nanocarrier and drug in the spheroid, with the cationic formulation accumulating to the greatest extent. Also, the smallest particle size formulation, micelles, penetrated to the greatest extent in the spheroid. The iRGD tumor-penetrating peptide co-administered with unmodified liposomes exhibited both high accumulation and penetration. The effect studies revealed that the formulations that penetrated or accumulated to the highest extent in the spheroid exhibited better antitumor activity compared to the other formulations. CONCLUSION: The 96-well plate format spheroid model developed in the study can be used toward the rational selection of nanocarrier therapeutics prior to their testing in in vivo models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08982104.2015.1105820

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solomon, M. A., Lemera, J., & D’Souza, G. G. M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
D’Souza, Gerard G. M.
Venue
Journal of Liposome Research
Published
2016-01-18
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
246-260
ISSN
  • 0898-2104 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2394
OpenAlex
W2335836427
Cited by
30
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Liposome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Harvard NeuroDiscovery Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
tumor spheroids, 3D tumor models, nanocarrier formulation, high-throughput screening, surface charge, particle size, micelles, liposomes, iRGD peptide, tumor-penetrating peptide, drug accumulation, anticancer activity, membrane integrity
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Models, Biological, Spheroids, Cellular, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Nanomedicine, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review