Cited by 27Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Preliminary validation study of the Spanish version of the satisfaction with life scale in persons with multiple sclerosis

Lucas-Carrasco, Ramona, Sastre-Garriga, Jaume, Galán, Ingrid, Den Oudsten, Brenda L., Power, Michael J.·2014·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess Life Satisfaction, using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and to analyze its psychometric properties in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). METHOD: Persons with MS (n = 84) recruited at the MS Centre of Catalonia (Spain) completed a battery of subjective assessments including the SWLS, the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument and disability module (WHOQOL-BREF, WHOQOL-DIS) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D); sociodemographic and disability status data were also gathered. Psychometric properties of the SWLS were investigated using standard psychometric methods. RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was 0.84. A factor analysis using a principal components method showed a one factor structure accounting for 62.6% of the variance. Statistically significant correlations were confirmed between SWLS with WHOQOL-BREF, WHOQOL-DIS and HADS-D. SWLS scores were significantly different between a priori defined groups: probable depressed versus nondepressed and participants perceiving a mild versus severe impact of disability on their lives. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the psychometrics properties of the SWLS in persons with MS. It might be a valuable tool to use in appraising persons with MS through the continuum of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The Spanish version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) is a reliable and valid instrument in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The SWLS is able to discriminate between participants with low or high scores on depressive symptoms or disability impact on life. SWLS might be useful through the continuum of care in persons with MS, including Rehabilitation Services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2013.825650

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucas-Carrasco, R., Sastre-Garriga, J., Galán, I., Den Oudsten, B. L., & Power, M. J.
Affiliations
Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (ES)
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1001-1005
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2055419792
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Satisfaction with Life Scale, multiple sclerosis, life satisfaction, psychometric validation, Spanish translation, scale reliability, scale validity, depression, quality of life, WHOQOL-BREF, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review