Cited by 506Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and care

Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the impact of depression, fatigue and disability

Amato, M P, Ponziani, G, Rossi, F, Liedl, C L, Stefanile, C, Rossi, L·2001·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

This study deals with the assessment of quality of life and its main clinical and demographical determinants in a clinical series of 103 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (37 men; 66 women; mean age 44.89 years; mean disease duration 12.40 years; mean EDSS score 4.07). We used the MSQOL-54 inventory, a disease-specific instrument recently validated in an Italian population. Each patient underwent a complete clinical assessment, including that of disability status (Expanded Disability Status Scale), cognitive function (Mini Mental State Examination), depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale). In terms of Pearson's correlations, there was a moderate inverse relationship between disability level and the MSQOL-54 physical composite score, and a moderate to strong inverse correlation between depression or fatigue severity and both the physical and mental composite scores. In a stepwise linear regression analysis, depression, fatigue and disability level were confirmed to be significant and independent predictors of quality of life. Quality of life instruments can help to provide a broader measure of the disease impact and to develop a care program tailored to the patient's needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135245850100700511

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amato, M. P., Ponziani, G., Rossi, F., Liedl, C. L., Stefanile, C., & Rossi, L.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2001-10
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
340-344
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2076989760
Cited by
506
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, quality of life, depression, fatigue, disability, MSQOL-54, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, cognitive function, predictors of quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review