The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats
Abstract
This study aims to suggest the limits of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) uses for medicinal purpose and was performed to explore the effect of various doses of silver nanoparticle in rats. Four different doses of AgNP (4, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) were injected intravenously. For safety evaluation of injected AgNP, body weight, organ coefficient, whole blood count, and biochemistry panel assay for liver function enzyme (AST, ALT, ALP, and GGTP), comet assay, ROS, and histological parameter were performed; 10-12 week old animals were randomly divided into groups of six individuals each for control, and doses of 40, 20, 10, and 4 mg/kg AgNP injected. Significant changes were observed (p < 0.01) in hematological parameters (WBC count, platelets counts, haemoglobin, and RBC count) in the 40 and 20 mg/kg groups. The changes were non-significant in the other groups (4 and 10 mg/kg group). In the 40 mg/kg group, a significant increase was also found in liver function enzymes like ALT and AST (p < 0.01), ALP (p < 0.01), GGTP (p < 0.01), and bilirubin (p < 0.01). ROS in blood serum increased in the high dose group. Tail migration in single cell gel electrophoresis in the 40, 20, 10, 4 mg/kg, and control groups was 34.9, 29.5, 17.8, 5.8, and 0.0 µm, respectively, which indicated damage in the DNA strand in the high dose group. EDXRF showed a ∼ 10-times increase in silver concentration in the 40 mg/kg group and TEM image also showed particle deposition in the 40 mg/kg group. This study indicates that the AgNP in doses (< 10 mg/kg) is safe for biomedical application and has no side-effects, but its high dose (> 20 mg/kg) is toxic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices
Soppimath, K. S., Aminabhavi, T. M., Kulkarni, A. R., & Rudzinski, W. E. (2001) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(00)00339-4 · Cited by 3,549
Pandey, R., Zahoor, A., Sharma, S., & Khuller, G. K. (2003) · Tuberculosis · doi:10.1016/j.tube.2003.07.001 · Cited by 220
Cited by
Ferdous, Z., & Nemmar, A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072375 · Cited by 1,019
Reactive Oxygen Species-Related Nanoparticle Toxicity in the Biomedical Field
Yu, Z., Li, Q., Wang, J., Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, Q., & Li, P. (2020) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-020-03344-7 · Cited by 709
Lignin for Nano‐ and Microscaled Carrier Systems: Applications, Trends, and Challenges
Sipponen, M. H., Lange, H., Crestini, C., Henn, A., & Österberg, M. (2019) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201900480 · Cited by 284
Manufactured nanomaterials: categorization and approaches to hazard assessment
Gebel, T., Foth, H., Damm, G., Freyberger, A., Kramer, P.-J., Lilienblum, W., Röhl, C., Schupp, T., Weiss, C., Wollin, K.-M., et al. (2014) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-014-1383-7 · Cited by 137
Gaharwar, U. S., Meena, R., & Rajamani, P. (2019) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s223142 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiwari, D. K., Jin, T., & Behari, J.
- Venue
- Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11-16
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-24
- ISSN
- 1537-6516 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6524
- OpenAlex
- W2153103173
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/15376516.2010.529184
- The paper
- Tiwari, D. K., Jin, T., & Behari, J. (2011). Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. https://doi.org/10.3109/15376516.2010.529184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.