Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats

Tiwari, Dhermendra K, Jin, Takashi, Behari, J.·2011·Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods

Abstract

This study aims to suggest the limits of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) uses for medicinal purpose and was performed to explore the effect of various doses of silver nanoparticle in rats. Four different doses of AgNP (4, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) were injected intravenously. For safety evaluation of injected AgNP, body weight, organ coefficient, whole blood count, and biochemistry panel assay for liver function enzyme (AST, ALT, ALP, and GGTP), comet assay, ROS, and histological parameter were performed; 10-12 week old animals were randomly divided into groups of six individuals each for control, and doses of 40, 20, 10, and 4 mg/kg AgNP injected. Significant changes were observed (p < 0.01) in hematological parameters (WBC count, platelets counts, haemoglobin, and RBC count) in the 40 and 20 mg/kg groups. The changes were non-significant in the other groups (4 and 10 mg/kg group). In the 40 mg/kg group, a significant increase was also found in liver function enzymes like ALT and AST (p < 0.01), ALP (p < 0.01), GGTP (p < 0.01), and bilirubin (p < 0.01). ROS in blood serum increased in the high dose group. Tail migration in single cell gel electrophoresis in the 40, 20, 10, 4 mg/kg, and control groups was 34.9, 29.5, 17.8, 5.8, and 0.0 µm, respectively, which indicated damage in the DNA strand in the high dose group. EDXRF showed a ∼ 10-times increase in silver concentration in the 40 mg/kg group and TEM image also showed particle deposition in the 40 mg/kg group. This study indicates that the AgNP in doses (< 10 mg/kg) is safe for biomedical application and has no side-effects, but its high dose (> 20 mg/kg) is toxic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15376516.2010.529184

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Tiwari, D. K., Jin, T., & Behari, J.
Venue
Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods
Published
2010-11-16
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
13-24
ISSN
  • 1537-6516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6524
OpenAlex
W2153103173
Cited by
272
References
2
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/15376516.2010.529184
The paper
Tiwari, D. K., Jin, T., & Behari, J. (2011). Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. https://doi.org/10.3109/15376516.2010.529184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.