Cited by 29Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Autonomic hypoactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the influence of methylphenidate

Conzelmann, Annette, Gerdes, Antje B. M., Mucha, Ronald F., Weyers, Peter, Lesch, Klaus-Peter, Bähne, Christina G., Fallgatter, Andreas J., Renner, Tobias J. +3 more·2014·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates an overall autonomic hypoactivity reflecting hypoarousal as important aetiological factor in ADHD at baseline during rest and in response towards stimuli. In addition, effects of methylphenidate (MPH) are examined. We further assessed whether this hypoarousal is a stable characteristic or ameliorated by arousing emotional stimuli. METHODS: Boys with ADHD were examined with (n = 35) or without MPH (n = 45) and compared with healthy boys (n = 22) regarding skin conductance level (SCL) during rest and skin conductance responses (SCRs) as well as valence and arousal ratings in response to positive, neutral, and negative pictures. RESULTS: ADHD children without MPH were characterized by reduced baseline SCL and overall reduced SCRs. ADHD children with MPH never differed from control children. All groups displayed normal valence and arousal ratings of the stimuli and enhanced SCRs to emotional in comparison to neutral pictures. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to unravel (1) a general autonomic hypoactivity in ADHD children at baseline and in response to low arousing neutral and highly arousing emotional stimuli, and (2) hints that MPH normalizes this hypoactivity. Results contribute to the understanding of ADHD aetiology and MPH functionality, and are consistent with the cognitive-energetic model of ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/15622975.2013.829584

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conzelmann et al. (2014), using EDA measures, found signs of hypo-sensitivity to social information in children and adolescents with ADHD when presented with a series of pictures of positive, negative or neutral valence.

    “Conzelmann et al. (2014), by using EDA measures, found signs of hypo-sensitivity to social information in children and adolescents with ADHD, when presented with a series of pictures of positive, negative or neutral valence.”
  • Within the ADHD group, children who were unmedicated showed significantly reduced pre-stimulus SCL and reduced post-stimulus SCRs, compared with controls and medicated ADHD children.

    “Within the ADHD group, children who were unmedicated showed significantly reduced pre-stimulus SCL and reduced post-stimulus SCRs, compared with controls and medicated ADHD children (see paragraphs 3.3 and 4.6 for a discussion of medication effects).”
  • Conzelmann et al. (2014) showed that unmedicated children with ADHD had reduced baseline SCL during a socio-emotional task and reduced SCRs in response to emotion-inducing pictures, while there was no significant difference between ADHD on-medication and controls.

    “Conzelmann et al. (2014), for example, showed that unmedicated children with ADHD had reduced baseline SCL during a socio-emotional task and reduced SCRs in response to emotion-inducing pictures, while there was no significant difference between ADHD on-medication and controls.”
  • In Conzelmann et al. (2014), children with ADHD under MPH were similar to TD, while unmedicated children with ADHD showed reduced baseline SCL during the socio-emotional task and SCRs in response to emotion-inducing pictures, compared to controls and ADHD + MPH.

    “Children with ADHD under MPH were similar to TD, while unmedicated children with ADHD showed reduced baseline SCL during the socio-emotional task and SCRs in response to emotion-inducing pictures, compared to controls and ADHD + MPH.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conzelmann, A., Gerdes, A. B. M., Mucha, R. F., Weyers, P., Lesch, K.-P., Bähne, C. G., Fallgatter, A. J., Renner, T. J., Warnke, A., Romanos, M., & Pauli, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Conzelmann, Annette
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Published
2013-09-09
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
56-65
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
OpenAlex
W2165504414
Cited by
29
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, skin conductance level, skin conductance response, hypoarousal, emotional stimuli, arousal, valence, boys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Arousal, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autonomic Nervous System, Child, Emotions, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review