Cited by 323Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Reward anticipation and outcomes in adult males with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Ströhle, Andreas, Stoy, Meline, Wrase, Jana, Schwarzer, Steffi, Schlagenhauf, Florian, Huss, Michael, Hein, Jakob, Nedderhut, Anke +7 more·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been suggested to involve deficits in reward processing. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare the neural responses to reward anticipation and outcomes in 10 adults with ADHD and 10 controls as they played a monetary incentive delay task. Adults with ADHD were unmedicated, and groups were matched for age, verbal IQ and smoking habits. Adults with ADHD showed decreased activation in the ventral striatum during the anticipation of gain, but increased activation of the orbitofrontal cortex in response to gain outcomes. Ventral striatal activation in adults with ADHD during gain anticipation was negatively correlated with self-rated symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity. These findings suggest that male adults with ADHD show neural signs of abnormal reward processing. Future studies will have to investigate whether these dysfunctional patterns might be normalized by treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.044

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amygdala hyperactivation has also been reported in ADHD during the processing of delayed rewards.

    “Amygdala hyperactivation has also been reported in ADHD during the processing of delayed rewards, perhaps consistent with the delay aversion found in some behavioral studies (38, 99-101).”
  • Some studies have found a stronger response to reward outcome either in striatum or in OFC in ADHD patients versus controls.

    “At the same time, some studies have found a stronger response to reward outcome either in striatum (Furukawa et al., 2014; von Rhein et al., 2015) or in the OFC (Strohle et al., 2008) in ADHD patients vs. controls.”

    From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Strohle et al., 2008

  • fMRI studies in ADHD have shown decreased ventral striatum activation during monetary-reward anticipation, atypical orbitofrontal activation during monetary-reward outcome, and decreased DCN and amygdala activation during delayed reward outcome.

    “These studies have shown decreased ventral striatum activation during monetary-reward anticipation [484-487], atypical orbitofrontal activation during monetary-reward outcome [487,488], and decreased DCN and amygdala activation during delayed reward outcome [485,489].”
  • Children with ADHD have reduced NAc activity when anticipating monetary rewards, seen particularly in drug-naive children, carriers of the DAT nine-repeat allele, and in response to seeking gains rather than avoiding losses.

    “Children with ADHD have reduced NAc activity when anticipating monetary rewards [18,486,487], which is seen particularly in drug-naive children [490], in carriers of the DAT nine-repeat allele [491], and in response to seeking gains rather than avoiding losses [492].”
  • This finding is consistent with fMRI data showing ventrostriatal hyporesponsiveness during immediate and delayed reward processing in adults with ADHD.

    “This finding is consistent with recent fMRI data showing ventrostriatal hyporesponsiveness during immediate and delayed reward processing in adults with ADHD (Plichta et al, 2009;Strohle et al, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ströhle, A., Stoy, M., Wrase, J., Schwarzer, S., Schlagenhauf, F., Huss, M., Hein, J., Nedderhut, A., Neumann, B., Gregor, A., Juckel, G., Knutson, B., Lehmkuhl, U., Bauer, M., & Heinz, A.
Affiliations
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Ströhle, Andreas
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
966-972
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130141507
Cited by
323
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reward processing, reward anticipation, reward outcome, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, monetary incentive delay task, hyperactivity, impulsivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Male, Motivation, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reward, Neostriatum, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review