Cited by 52Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchSpinal Cord Injury Research

Is head trauma a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? An evidence based review

Armon, Carmel, Nelson, Lorene M.·2012·Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the epidemiological literature regarding the association between trauma to the head and ALS, in order to determine if trauma to the head is a risk factor for ALS. A Medline literature search was conducted for the period between 1980 and October 2010 using the search terms: ('head trauma' OR 'head injury') AND (ALS OR 'amyotrophic lateral sclerosis' OR MND OR 'motor neuron disease'). The references of primary articles and reviews were checked to assure completeness of the search. Articles with primary data and reference groups were reviewed. The American Academy of Neurology evidence based method for classification of evidence for inferring causality and assigning level of conclusion was used. Twelve of 14 articles published since 1980 met the inclusion criteria. One class II article and three class III articles showed an association between a single instance of head trauma and ALS that did not exceed what might be seen due to chance alone. Eight class IV evidence articles could not inform conclusions. We concluded that evidence based analysis of the epidemiologic literature does not permit concluding that a single instance of head trauma is a risk factor for, or causes, ALS (Level U conclusion).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17482968.2012.660954

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies with higher class of evidence (based on medical records rather than patients' recall) showed no excess of head trauma prior to symptom onset.

    “Furthermore, studies with higher class of evidence (based on medical records rather than patients’ recall) showed no excess of head trauma prior to symptom onset (Armon & Nelson, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armon, C., & Nelson, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Armon, Carmel
Venue
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
351-356
ISSN
  • 1471-180X (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-2968
OpenAlex
W1971748774
Cited by
52
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
head trauma, traumatic brain injury, risk factors, motor neuron disease, causality, classification of evidence
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Risk Factors, Causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review